Google Pixel 8a Vs Samsung Galaxy A54 Camera Comparison In Low Light

When it comes to smartphone photography, few scenarios test a device’s capabilities as rigorously as low-light environments. Whether you're capturing a candlelit dinner, cityscapes after sunset, or a quiet moment under dim indoor lighting, the quality of your photos depends heavily on sensor performance, software tuning, and computational photography. Two mid-range contenders—Google’s Pixel 8a and Samsung’s Galaxy A54—both promise strong camera experiences, but how do they truly stack up when the lights go down?

This detailed comparison examines their low-light camera performance across multiple dimensions: hardware specs, image processing, dynamic range, noise control, autofocus behavior, and real-world usability. If you're deciding between these two phones based on photo quality in darker conditions, this guide delivers the insights you need.

Hardware Foundations: Sensors and Optics

google pixel 8a vs samsung galaxy a54 camera comparison in low light

The starting point for any camera system is its physical components. While both phones rely heavily on software enhancements, the underlying hardware sets the baseline for what’s possible in challenging lighting.

The Google Pixel 8a features a 64MP main sensor (Sony IMX787) with an f/1.9 aperture and optical image stabilization (OIS). It uses pixel binning to produce 16MP output by combining four pixels into one, improving light capture. The sensor size is approximately 1/1.31\", which is relatively large for this price tier, allowing more photons to reach the sensor in dark scenes.

The Samsung Galaxy A54, meanwhile, uses a 50MP main sensor (Samsung ISOCELL GN5) with an f/1.8 aperture and OIS. It outputs 12.5MP images via 4-to-1 pixel binning and has a sensor size of about 1/1.56\". While still competent, it's physically smaller than the Pixel’s sensor, meaning each pixel gathers slightly less light under identical conditions.

On paper, the Pixel 8a holds a modest hardware advantage due to its larger sensor and deeper pixel wells. However, hardware alone doesn’t determine final image quality—especially in low light, where software becomes the decisive factor.

Feature Google Pixel 8a Samsung Galaxy A54
Main Sensor Resolution 64MP 50MP
Effective Output 16MP (4-in-1 binning) 12.5MP (4-in-1 binning)
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.8
Sensor Size ~1/1.31\" ~1/1.56\"
OIS Support Yes Yes
Night Mode Default Yes, aggressive triggering Manual toggle required
Tip: In very dim settings, stabilize your phone against a surface or use a mini tripod. Even with OIS, longer exposures benefit from reduced hand movement.

Software Processing: The Real Game-Changer

In low light, software does far more than just tweak brightness—it reconstructs entire scenes using multi-frame processing, noise reduction algorithms, and AI-driven enhancements. This is where Google has historically excelled, and the Pixel 8a continues that legacy.

Google’s Tensor G3 chip powers advanced machine learning models that run directly on-device during photo capture. Its Night Sight mode combines up to nine frames over several seconds, aligning them intelligently to reduce blur while maximizing detail retention. More importantly, it applies tone mapping and color correction tailored specifically to human perception—preserving natural skin tones and avoiding oversaturation even in near-darkness.

The Galaxy A54 relies on Samsung’s Exynos 1380 processor and its own Multi Frame Noise Reduction (MFNR) technology. While capable, it tends to apply heavier noise suppression, sometimes at the cost of texture and fine detail. Colors can appear warmer and more saturated out of the box, which may look appealing initially but often drifts from realism. Additionally, Night Mode must be manually activated; otherwise, the phone defaults to standard HDR processing, which struggles significantly in darker environments.

“Computational photography isn’t about capturing more light—it’s about reconstructing intent. Google understands context better than most.” — Lena Petrova, Mobile Imaging Analyst at DXOMARK

One notable difference lies in shadow recovery. The Pixel 8a consistently lifts shadows without introducing banding or chroma noise, maintaining smooth gradients in dark fabrics, walls, or outdoor foliage. The A54, while brighter in some cases, often reveals grainy textures in blacks and produces halos around high-contrast edges due to aggressive sharpening.

Real-World Performance Scenarios

To evaluate these differences beyond lab conditions, consider three common low-light situations:

Dining Room Lighting (Warm Artificial Light)

In a typical home dining setup with 2700K bulbs and ambient table lamps, the Pixel 8a renders food and faces accurately, preserving subtle highlights and warm undertones without blowing out candles or overhead fixtures. The A54 tends to overexpose close subjects and shift whites toward yellow, requiring manual adjustment via Pro mode.

Street Photography at Dusk

Under mixed urban lighting—LED streetlights, neon signs, car headlights—the Pixel maintains balanced exposure across moving vehicles and static backgrounds. Dynamic range remains wide, preventing sky clipping. The A54 captures decent contrast but compresses highlights faster, losing detail in bright areas like illuminated storefronts.

Indoor Low-Light Without Flash

In a dimly lit bedroom (~10 lux), both phones switch to Night Mode automatically (Pixel) or upon user selection (A54). The Pixel produces usable results within 2–3 seconds, showing clear facial features and fabric patterns. The A54 requires a 4–5 second exposure and yields softer details, particularly in corners where lens falloff combines with noise suppression.

Mini Case Study: Concert Venue Snapshot

Rahul attended a small live music event in a basement venue lit only by colored stage LEDs. Using both devices side-by-side, he found that the Pixel 8a captured performers’ silhouettes with visible facial contours and accurate red/blue hues. The A54 rendered similar compositions but introduced purple fringing along guitar edges and muted green tones into black clothing. Rahul noted the Pixel felt more “reliable” because it worked instantly, whereas the A54 needed trial-and-error with exposure compensation.

Autofocus and Stabilization Behavior

In low light, autofocus systems struggle due to reduced contrast. Both phones use hybrid phase-detection and contrast-detect methods, but their implementation differs.

The Pixel 8a leverages its dedicated CNN (Convolutional Neural Network) model trained on millions of low-light images to predict subject distance and focus priority. This allows it to lock onto eyes and faces faster—even in sub-50 lux conditions. Combined with OIS, it minimizes motion blur during extended exposures.

The A54 uses conventional AF algorithms that hunt more visibly in darkness, especially when subjects move slightly. While OIS helps, the lack of predictive focusing means users often experience shutter lag or misfires unless they tap to focus first. In video mode, this gap widens: the Pixel maintains steady focus tracking during walks at night, while the A54 frequently refocuses abruptly, creating distracting jumps in footage.

Step-by-Step Guide: Getting the Best Low-Light Photos

  1. Enable Night Mode manually if not automatic – On the A54, ensure Night Mode is toggled before shooting.
  2. Use a stable surface or brace your arms – Rest elbows on a table or wall to minimize shake during long exposures.
  3. Avoid digital zoom in dark scenes – Neither phone handles cropped zoom well at night; stick to 1x for maximum clarity.
  4. Tap to focus and expose – Prioritize your subject by tapping their face or a central point on screen.
  5. Wait for processing to finish – Don’t move the phone immediately after capture; both devices continue optimizing for 2–4 seconds.
Tip: For consistent results, disable AI beautification modes on the A54—they can soften already-noisy images further.

Image Consistency and Post-Capture Flexibility

Beyond initial output, how well do these photos hold up after editing? RAW support offers a window into true sensor performance.

The Pixel 8a saves full-resolution HEIF and optional DNG (RAW) files, giving photographers room to recover shadows, adjust white balance, and reduce noise non-destructively. Thanks to cleaner base images, edits remain artifact-free even with significant adjustments.

The A54 does not support RAW capture in its stock camera app, limiting professional workflows. JPEGs are heavily processed, making highlight recovery nearly impossible and increasing posterization risks when lifting shadows.

Additionally, the Pixel integrates seamlessly with Google Photos, enabling AI-powered enhancements like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur—tools that can salvage poorly lit shots after the fact. Samsung offers similar tools in Gallery, but they’re less refined and often require cloud uploads.

Checklist: Choosing Based on Your Needs

  • ✅ Choose the Pixel 8a if:
    • You prioritize natural-looking night photos with minimal effort
    • You shoot in varied lighting and want reliable auto-mode performance
    • You value RAW capture and post-processing flexibility
    • You record videos in low light and need stable autofocus
  • ✅ Choose the Galaxy A54 if:
    • You prefer bolder, more vibrant colors straight out of camera
    • You already use Samsung ecosystem services (SmartThings, DeX)
    • You want longer official software support (up to 4 Android upgrades)
    • You need expandable storage via microSD

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the Pixel 8a always use Night Mode in dark settings?

Yes, the Pixel 8a automatically engages Night Mode whenever ambient light drops below a certain threshold. You can see the timer (usually 1–3 seconds) on-screen, and it adjusts dynamically based on scene brightness and motion.

Can the Galaxy A54 compete with flagship cameras at night?

It performs respectably for its class but falls short of premium devices like the S23 or iPhone 15 in extreme low light. Its strength lies in daytime versatility rather than nocturnal excellence.

Is there a noticeable difference in front-camera night performance?

Yes. The Pixel 8a’s 13MP selfie camera benefits from Face Unblur and Night Sight, producing sharper, better-exposed portraits in dim rooms. The A54’s 32MP front shooter captures more resolution but suffers from smudging and excessive smoothing when light is scarce.

Final Verdict: Who Wins After Dark?

While both phones deliver solid overall experiences, the **Google Pixel 8a emerges as the superior choice for low-light photography**. Its combination of a larger sensor, intelligent software processing, and seamless Night Mode integration ensures consistently excellent results with minimal user input. It excels where it matters most: retaining detail, managing noise, and delivering natural color reproduction in environments that challenge most mid-range sensors.

The Samsung Galaxy A54 isn’t without merit—it offers excellent battery life, a brighter display, and broader software update promises. But when the sun goes down, it demands more from the user: manual mode switching, careful framing, and acceptance of softer outputs. For casual photographers and social media sharers who value convenience and authenticity, the Pixel 8a simply works better, more often.

“The best camera is the one that gets out of your way. Google builds phones for moments, not menus.” — David Kim, Tech Editor at Wired

Take Action Today

If low-light photography is a priority, don’t settle for marketing claims—test these capabilities yourself. Visit a café after sunset, walk through a park at twilight, or take portrait shots indoors without turning on every light. Compare the results side by side. You’ll quickly see why computational intelligence, backed by purpose-built hardware, makes the Pixel 8a the standout performer when visibility fades.

💬 Have you tested either phone in low light? Share your experience, sample descriptions, or tips in the comments—your insights could help others make a more informed decision!

Article Rating

★ 5.0 (47 reviews)
Lucas White

Lucas White

Technology evolves faster than ever, and I’m here to make sense of it. I review emerging consumer electronics, explore user-centric innovation, and analyze how smart devices transform daily life. My expertise lies in bridging tech advancements with practical usability—helping readers choose devices that truly enhance their routines.