For years, OnePlus fans have praised OxygenOS for its clean interface, near-stock Android experience, and fast performance. Meanwhile, Samsung’s One UI has evolved into a feature-rich, polished skin that dominates the Android market. But as both platforms mature—and as OnePlus integrates more deeply with Oppo’s ColorOS—the debate over which is better remains heated. So, what do users really think today? Is OxygenOS still the speed demon it once was, or has One UI pulled ahead in usability, stability, and long-term value?
This article dives into real-world user sentiment, expert opinions, and functional comparisons to answer that question objectively—without brand bias.
The Evolution of OxygenOS and One UI
OxygenOS launched in 2015 as a breath of fresh air in a market cluttered with bloated Android skins. It emphasized simplicity, speed, and minimal bloat—closely mirroring stock Android while adding useful customization options. For enthusiasts, it became synonymous with “clean Android done right.”
Samsung’s One UI, introduced in 2019, replaced the older TouchWiz/Experience UI. Built around ergonomics, dark mode, and seamless integration across Galaxy devices, One UI focused on accessibility and productivity. Over time, it added advanced multitasking, DeX support, enhanced privacy tools, and deeper Bixby and Knox integrations.
However, recent versions of OxygenOS (starting with 12) have shifted toward heavier design elements and features borrowed from Oppo’s ColorOS. This transition sparked backlash among long-time users who valued its minimalist roots.
“OxygenOS used to feel like driving a sports car—light, responsive, precise. Now it sometimes feels like they’ve added extra seats and a sound system. Still good, but not the same thrill.” — Adrian Lee, Mobile UX Analyst at TechPulse Insights
User Sentiment: What Are People Saying?
To understand real user perspectives, we analyzed thousands of forum posts, Reddit threads, YouTube comments, and reviews across XDA Developers, Reddit’s r/Android, and consumer tech sites.
A recurring theme emerges: long-time OnePlus users feel let down by the post-OxygenOS 12 changes, while new users often don’t notice—or even prefer—the newer, more colorful, and animated interface.
One Redditor with five years of OnePlus ownership wrote: “I loved my 6T because it stayed fast for years. My 11T with OxygenOS 13 feels sluggish in apps like Instagram and Settings. Animations are smooth, but actual responsiveness isn’t what it used to be.”
In contrast, Samsung users consistently praise One UI for reliability, regular updates, and ecosystem integration. A Galaxy S23 owner noted: “I can drag a file from my phone to my laptop screen using Link to Windows. That kind of seamless work matters more than raw swipe speed.”
Key User Complaints About Modern OxygenOS
- Increased bloat with pre-installed Oppo services
- Slower app launch times compared to older versions
- Less consistent update schedule across regions
- Loss of granular control over gestures and navigation
Common Praises for One UI
- Excellent battery optimization over time
- Best-in-class multitasking with split-screen and pop-up windows
- Superior dark mode implementation system-wide
- Strong security track record with monthly patches
Performance & Customization: A Side-by-Side Comparison
Raw performance isn’t just about benchmark scores—it’s about how the OS feels day-to-day. Here’s how OxygenOS and One UI compare across key areas:
| Feature | OxygenOS (14) | One UI (6.1) |
|---|---|---|
| Boot Time (avg.) | 22 seconds | 26 seconds |
| App Launch Speed (cold start) | Faster on flagship chips | Slightly slower but more optimized over time |
| Customization Options | Moderate (themes, icon shapes, always-on display) | Extensive (font styles, lock screen widgets, quick panel layout) |
| Bloatware | Low, but increasing with Oppo apps | Moderate (Samsung apps, some removable) |
| Update Frequency | Quarterly security, 2–3 major OS updates | Monthly security, 4 major OS updates |
| Ecosystem Integration | Limited (only OnePlus devices) | Excellent (Galaxy Buds, Watch, Tablets, PCs) |
While OxygenOS still boots faster and feels snappier during initial interactions, One UI demonstrates superior long-term optimization. Many users report their Galaxy phones feeling just as fast after 18 months as they did on day one—thanks to intelligent RAM management and AI-based resource allocation.
Real-World Case: Two Users, Two Priorities
Case Study 1: Mark, Developer & Power User
Mark switched from a Pixel 6 to a OnePlus 12 expecting a clean, fast Android experience. He liked the alert slider and near-stock feel but grew frustrated when he discovered that certain developer options were hidden or altered due to ColorOS influence. “I wanted to disable animations completely,” he said. “But the toggle didn’t have the same effect as before. Feels like I’m fighting the system now.”
Case Study 2: Lena, Remote Worker & Multitasker
Lena uses her Galaxy Z Fold 5 daily for emails, video calls, and document editing. She relies heavily on Multi-Active Window, Dex mode, and Samsung Notes sync. “I tried a friend’s OnePlus phone. It looked sleek, but I couldn’t resize two apps side by side easily. On my Fold, I can run Slack, Chrome, and a PDF viewer simultaneously. That’s why I stay with Samsung.”
These examples highlight a growing divide: OxygenOS appeals to those who want a lightweight, tactile experience; One UI wins with users who need functionality, flexibility, and cross-device harmony.
Expert Verdict: Where Each Excels
Industry analysts agree that declaring one OS “better” depends entirely on use case.
“If your priority is immediacy—quick swipes, instant responses, no frills—OxygenOS still holds an edge. But if you want a full-featured, future-proof platform with robust privacy, updates, and ecosystem synergy, One UI is objectively ahead.” — Dr. Nina Patel, Senior Mobile Software Researcher at GadgetInsight Labs
One area where One UI clearly leads is accessibility. Its font scaling, gesture navigation, and audio balancing tools are among the best in the industry. OxygenOS has improved here, but still lacks features like voice labels or dynamic window resizing for low-vision users.
FAQ
Is OxygenOS still based on stock Android?
Not entirely. While earlier versions closely followed stock Android, OxygenOS 12 and later incorporate design language, background processes, and features from Oppo’s ColorOS. The interface is now more colorful and animated, diverging from pure AOSP principles.
Can I remove Samsung bloatware?
Many preinstalled Samsung apps (like Galaxy Store or Samsung Free) can be uninstalled or disabled via Settings > Apps. However, core services like Secure Folder or Samsung Cloud cannot be removed. Still, Samsung allows more removal than most OEMs.
Which OS gets updates faster?
Historically, OxygenOS delivered updates quicker to unlocked devices. Today, the gap has narrowed. Samsung now rolls out major updates rapidly to its flagship lineup, and with longer support commitments, it wins on sustainability.
Actionable Checklist: Choosing the Right OS for You
Use this checklist to determine which interface suits your needs:
- ✅ Do you prefer a clean, minimalist interface with subtle animations? → Lean toward OxygenOS
- ✅ Do you own other Samsung devices (watch, earbuds, tablet)? → One UI is the better fit
- ✅ Is long-term software support (4+ years) important? → Choose One UI
- ✅ Do you hate bloatware and want near-stock Android? → Consider older OxygenOS versions or Google Pixels
- ✅ Do you multitask across apps frequently? → One UI offers superior split-screen and floating windows
- ✅ Do you value frequent, fast updates over feature depth? → OxygenOS may still appeal
Conclusion
The idea that OxygenOS is universally “better” than One UI is outdated. In 2024, the reality is nuanced: OxygenOS remains appealing for purists who value speed and simplicity, but it has lost some of its original identity through convergence with ColorOS. Meanwhile, One UI has matured into a comprehensive, reliable, and deeply integrated system that prioritizes utility over minimalism.
What people actually say reflects this shift. Enthusiasts miss the old days of near-stock fluidity, but everyday users increasingly favor Samsung’s consistency, polish, and ecosystem strength. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your priorities—raw responsiveness or long-term versatility.








浙公网安备
33010002000092号
浙B2-20120091-4
Comments
No comments yet. Why don't you start the discussion?