In the premium Android smartphone arena, two devices dominate the conversation when it comes to photography: the Google Pixel 8 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. Both are engineered to push mobile imaging boundaries, especially in challenging lighting conditions. But when night falls and ambient light dwindles, which device truly excels? This isn’t just about megapixels or sensor size—it’s about computational photography, image processing intelligence, and real-world usability. Let’s dissect how these flagship phones perform in low light, based on technical specs, real usage patterns, and nuanced photographic outcomes.
Sensor Technology and Hardware Foundations
The foundation of any great low-light photo begins with hardware. While software plays a massive role—especially in modern smartphones—the physical sensor and lens quality set the baseline for what’s possible.
The Pixel 8 Pro uses a 50MP main sensor (Sony IMX890) with an f/1.68 aperture and 1.2µm pixel size. It also features dual-pixel autofocus and optical image stabilization (OIS). On paper, this is solid but not class-leading in terms of raw hardware. However, Google has always prioritized software over sensor bloat, banking on its HDR+ and Night Sight algorithms to extract more detail from less light.
In contrast, the Galaxy S24 Ultra boasts a 200MP main sensor (ISOCELL HP2) with adaptive pixel binning—capable of combining pixels into larger 2.4µm units in low light. Its variable aperture (f/1.7–f/2.2) allows dynamic control depending on lighting conditions. Paired with advanced OIS and laser autofocus, Samsung aims to deliver both resolution and sensitivity.
While the S24 Ultra’s higher-resolution sensor offers more data capture potential, the Pixel counters with superior per-pixel optimization and consistent color science. The key differentiator, however, lies in how each brand processes that data after capture.
Computational Photography: Where Software Takes Over
Low-light performance today is less about photons captured and more about how those photons are interpreted. This is where Google’s legacy in machine learning and image processing shines.
Google’s Night Sight, now enhanced with Magic Editor and improved HDR+, analyzes multiple frames across varying exposures. The Pixel 8 Pro typically captures 15+ frames in dark environments, aligning and merging them using AI-powered noise reduction. The result is often natural shadow recovery, accurate white balance, and minimal chroma noise—even under streetlights or mixed indoor lighting.
Samsung’s Night Mode has evolved significantly. With the S24 Ultra, it leverages the new Galaxy Image Intelligence engine powered by on-device AI. It applies scene-aware enhancements, boosting brightness selectively while attempting to preserve textures. However, some users report a tendency toward over-sharpening and artificial-looking skies in very dark scenes.
“Google’s approach to low-light photography is rooted in realism. Samsung leans toward vibrancy and clarity, sometimes at the cost of authenticity.” — David Kim, Mobile Imaging Analyst at DXOMARK
In side-by-side tests conducted in urban nighttime settings—dimly lit alleys, indoor cafes, and moonlit parks—the Pixel consistently delivered more balanced exposures. Highlights were preserved without blowing out street signs, and shadows revealed usable detail without excessive grain. The S24 Ultra, while brighter in many cases, occasionally introduced halos around light sources and slightly cooler color tones that required post-processing correction.
Zoom and Telephoto Performance in Darkness
One area where the S24 Ultra holds a distinct advantage is zoom capability. It features a 5x periscope telephoto lens (50MP sensor, 3.4x optical zoom with tetraprism design) and supports up to 100x digital zoom. The Pixel 8 Pro offers a 5x telephoto lens as well, but with a 48MP sensor and less aggressive cropping algorithms.
| Feature | Pixel 8 Pro | Galaxy S24 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main Sensor | 50MP, f/1.68, 1.2µm | 200MP, f/1.7 (adaptive), 2.4µm (binned) |
| Night Mode Frame Capture | 15–20 frames | 10–15 frames |
| Telephoto Zoom (Optical) | 5x | 3x & 5x (dual telephoto) |
| Low-Light Video (4K) | Excellent dynamic range | Brighter output, mild noise |
| Processing Time (Night Shot) | ~3 seconds | ~4–5 seconds |
When shooting distant subjects at night—such as illuminated monuments or stage performers—the S24 Ultra’s dual telephoto system provides greater flexibility. At 5x optical zoom, it maintains sharpness better than the Pixel, thanks to dedicated hardware and AI super-resolution stacking. However, beyond 10x, image degradation accelerates quickly due to noise amplification.
The Pixel’s telephoto performs admirably within its limits. Its AI denoising works effectively even when digitally extending beyond 5x, though fine details like facial features or text on signs become softer compared to Samsung’s output.
Real-World Example: Concert Photography Test
A recent test was conducted at a rooftop jazz performance in downtown Austin. Ambient light came from string bulbs and stage spotlights, creating high-contrast pockets of brightness and deep shadows. Both phones were mounted on a mini tripod for stability.
The Pixel 8 Pro captured the saxophonist’s expression with remarkable fidelity. Skin tones remained warm and natural, and the background audience retained depth without turning into a black void. Noise was present but well-controlled, resembling film grain rather than digital speckling.
The S24 Ultra produced a brighter image overall, lifting shadow areas aggressively. While this made the photo “pop” initially, closer inspection revealed loss of texture in darker clothing and slight purple fringing near bright edges. The auto-HDR worked hard to balance exposure but clipped some highlight details in the overhead lights.
In this scenario, the Pixel’s restraint proved more artistically satisfying, while the S24 Ultra prioritized visibility over nuance.
Video Capabilities After Dark
Still photos aren’t the whole story. Many users now rely on smartphones for handheld video recording in evening conditions—whether vlogging, capturing family moments, or documenting travel.
The Pixel 8 Pro introduces Cinematic Blur and improved audio focusing in videos. Its 4K/60fps night recording uses temporal noise reduction across frames, resulting in smooth, cinematic footage with realistic motion blur. Audio separation helps isolate voices even in noisy environments.
The S24 Ultra counters with Super Steady mode and enhanced AI-based wind noise reduction. Its video tends to be brighter and more stabilized, making it ideal for action shots or walking recordings. However, the aggressive sharpening sometimes creates a “plastic” look on skin, particularly under sodium-vapor lighting.
In direct comparison, the Pixel delivers more cinematic, filmic results—ideal for content creators seeking authenticity. The S24 Ultra caters to users who want clear, bright, and stable clips suitable for social media uploads without editing.
Expert Verdict: Who Wins in Low Light?
After extensive testing across diverse environments—from candlelit dinners to moonlit beaches—the conclusion hinges on user priorities.
If you value **natural color reproduction**, **shadow detail**, and **consistent processing**, the Pixel 8 Pro emerges as the superior choice for low-light photography. Its decade-long refinement of HDR+ and Night Sight pays dividends in scenes where subtlety matters. Google’s commitment to minimizing artificial enhancement results in images that feel true to life.
If you prioritize **brightness**, **zoom versatility**, and **high-resolution capture**—even at the expense of some realism—the Galaxy S24 Ultra takes the lead. Its 200MP sensor and dual telephoto lenses offer unmatched flexibility, especially for hybrid shooting needs that span daylight and dusk.
“For most photographers, low light isn’t just about luminance—it’s about mood. The Pixel understands mood. The S24 Ultra understands specifications.” — Lena Torres, Editorial Photographer & Tech Reviewer
Checklist: Optimizing Your Phone for Low-Light Shots
- Enable Night Mode manually for maximum control
- Use a tripod or stabilize the phone against a surface
- Avoid digital zoom; crop later if needed
- Turn off flash to preserve natural ambiance
- Shoot in RAW format for greater post-processing flexibility
- Keep the lens clean—smudges worsen glare in dark scenes
- Let the shutter finish completely; don’t rush the process
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the Pixel 8 Pro have better night portraits than the S24 Ultra?
Yes, in most cases. The Pixel’s Portrait mode uses depth mapping combined with Night Sight, producing soft, flattering bokeh with accurate skin tones. The S24 Ultra sometimes struggles with edge detection in dim light, leading to halo effects around hair or glasses.
Can the Galaxy S24 Ultra shoot RAW in Night Mode?
Yes, the S24 Ultra supports HEIF and RAW capture in Night Mode via Pro Visual Editor. However, Google’s Pixel offers more intuitive RAW processing through its native Camera app and seamless integration with Google Photos editing tools.
Which phone processes low-light photos faster?
The Pixel 8 Pro typically finishes processing a Night Shot in about 3 seconds, while the S24 Ultra takes 4–5 seconds, depending on scene complexity. The difference is minor but noticeable during rapid-fire shooting.
Final Recommendation
Choosing between the Pixel 8 Pro and Galaxy S24 Ultra for low-light photography ultimately depends on your creative intent. The Pixel appeals to purists—those who appreciate tonal accuracy, organic textures, and minimal digital interference. It’s the tool of choice for storytellers, travelers, and anyone who values emotional resonance in their images.
The S24 Ultra suits power users who demand versatility—photographers who switch between macro, telephoto, and wide-angle shots throughout the day, including in twilight conditions. Its brightness boost and zoom capabilities make it formidable, even if the final output occasionally feels processed.
For dedicated low-light excellence, the Pixel 8 Pro earns the edge. But the S24 Ultra isn’t far behind—and for those already invested in the Samsung ecosystem, its all-around strength may outweigh marginal differences in nocturnal image quality.








浙公网安备
33010002000092号
浙B2-20120091-4
Comments
No comments yet. Why don't you start the discussion?