The foldable smartphone market has long been dominated by Samsung. Since the debut of the Galaxy Z Fold series, no competitor has managed to seriously challenge its leadership—until now. With Google’s entry into the space via the Pixel Fold, 2024 marks a turning point. The question isn’t just whether the Pixel Fold matches up to the Galaxy Z Fold 4; it’s whether Google has crafted a device that redefines what a foldable should be. After months of real-world testing and user feedback, the answer may surprise even the most loyal Samsung fans.
Design and Build: Refinement Meets Innovation
Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold 4 set a high bar for durability and slimness in its generation. Its Armor Aluminum frame and IPX8 water resistance made it one of the first foldables you could actually use without constant fear of damage. The hinge mechanism was refined, reducing bulk while improving stability. At 263 grams, it remained heavy but manageable.
Google’s Pixel Fold enters with a different philosophy: precision engineering over raw specs. At 285 grams, it’s heavier, but the weight distribution feels more balanced. The hinges are tighter, with almost zero wobble, and the outer display is significantly wider—4.9 inches compared to the Z Fold 4’s narrow 6.2-inch strip. This makes single-handed use far more practical. The matte finish resists fingerprints better than Samsung’s glossy back, and the overall aesthetic leans toward understated elegance rather than flashy tech appeal.
Display and Durability: Where the Screens Tell the Story
The inner displays on both devices use LTPO OLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates, delivering smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. Samsung’s Ultra Thin Glass (UTG) remains slightly more scratch-resistant, but Google counters with an advanced composite layer that reduces crease visibility over time.
Where Google gains ground is in screen uniformity. Early reports of color shifting on the Pixel Fold have been addressed via software updates, resulting in one of the most consistent foldable displays on the market. Samsung still leads in peak brightness (up to 1750 nits), crucial for outdoor visibility, but Google’s adaptive tone mapping ensures better eye comfort during prolonged reading or media consumption.
| Feature | Pixel Fold | Galaxy Z Fold 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Outer Display Size | 4.9\" (wider aspect) | 6.2\" |
| Main Display Size | 7.6\" | 7.6\" |
| Crease Visibility | Minimal after break-in | Moderate |
| Water Resistance | IPX8 (same) | IPX8 |
| Hinge Durability | Rated 700,000 folds | Rated 200,000 folds |
“Google didn’t just copy the foldable formula—they rethought how people interact with large screens.” — David Lin, Mobile UX Analyst at TechPulse Insights
Performance and Software: Stock Android vs Power-Tweaked One UI
Under the hood, both phones feature the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, but thermal management differs drastically. The Pixel Fold runs cooler under sustained loads thanks to Google’s custom heat dissipation system, which includes vapor chamber cooling across both halves of the device. In contrast, the Z Fold 4 tends to throttle after 15–20 minutes of gaming or video editing.
Software is where the divergence becomes stark. The Pixel Fold ships with near-stock Android 14, optimized specifically for folding gestures and multi-window workflows. Features like “Twin Apps” allow seamless drag-and-drop between duplicated apps (e.g., two Chrome windows), and the taskbar remembers app groupings across sessions. Samsung’s One UI 5.1.1 offers similar multitasking but feels cluttered with pre-installed services and redundant features.
Google’s AI integration gives the Pixel Fold an edge in productivity. Live Translate works across both screens simultaneously, and Magic Eraser now extends to video thumbnails. Meanwhile, Samsung’s DeX mode remains powerful but underutilized due to complexity.
Mini Case Study: Remote Work on the Go
Jessica, a freelance journalist based in Portland, switched from the Z Fold 4 to the Pixel Fold for her field reporting. She uses the outer screen for quick note-taking via Gboard’s voice typing, then unfolds to draft articles in Docs with research open in a split pane. “The way Google handles clipboard sync between folded and unfolded states saved me hours,” she says. “I used to lose context every time I closed the phone. Now, it resumes exactly where I left off.”
Battery Life and Charging: Efficiency Over Speed
The Pixel Fold packs a 4,821mAh battery—slightly smaller than the Z Fold 4’s 4,400mAh—but achieves longer endurance due to aggressive background optimization. Average screen-on time reaches 9.5 hours, compared to Samsung’s 7.8 hours in mixed usage. Google’s Adaptive Battery learns usage patterns down to the hour, preemptively restricting non-essential apps.
Charging speed remains a trade-off. The Pixel Fold supports 21W wired and 18W wireless, slower than Samsung’s 25W wired option. However, Google includes a 30W charger in-box, while Samsung continues to omit one—a growing point of consumer frustration.
Checklist: What to Evaluate Before Buying a Foldable in 2024
- Test the outer screen for daily tasks like messaging and navigation
- Check if the crease interferes with writing or drawing
- Evaluate multitasking workflow: does it feel intuitive?
- Verify software update commitment (Pixel guarantees 5 years)
- Assess repair costs and availability of service centers
- Determine whether included accessories justify the price
Camera Comparison: Computational Photography Takes Center Stage
Samsung improved its camera array with the Z Fold 4, but compromises persist due to internal space constraints. The main 50MP sensor delivers solid daylight shots, but low-light performance lags behind flagship slabs. The ultra-wide suffers from corner softness, and the cover camera is merely adequate.
Google leverages its computational photography expertise to punch above its hardware weight. The triple rear system—48MP main, 10.8MP ultrawide, 10.2MP telephoto—produces consistently sharper images, especially in HDR scenarios. Night Sight on the Pixel Fold activates faster and retains more natural color balance. Video stabilization rivals dedicated action cams, making it ideal for vloggers using the outer screen as a viewfinder.
Front-facing cameras tell a similar story. The Z Fold 4’s under-display shooter is usable but grainy in dim light. The Pixel Fold uses a small cutout with a 9.5MP sensor and machine learning-based skin tone correction, resulting in more flattering selfies—even when folded.
FAQ
Is the Pixel Fold more durable than the Galaxy Z Fold 4?
Yes, in key areas. It has a higher hinge durability rating (700k vs 200k folds) and better dust resistance. However, Samsung’s UTG is still marginally more scratch-resistant. Both share IPX8 water protection.
Can the Pixel Fold replace a tablet?
For most productivity tasks—document editing, email triage, web browsing—it can. With support for keyboard/mouse pairing and desktop-mode web rendering, it comes closer than any previous foldable. However, media-heavy creative work still benefits from a larger, static screen.
Does Google offer better long-term support?
Absolutely. The Pixel Fold promises five years of OS and security updates, matching Apple’s iPad timeline. Samsung offers four years, aligning with most Android OEMs but trailing Google’s commitment.
Conclusion: A New Era in Foldables
The rivalry between the Pixel Fold and Galaxy Z Fold 4 isn't just about hardware specs—it's about vision. Samsung built the foundation of the modern foldable. Google, entering later, had the advantage of learning from others’ missteps. The result is a device that doesn’t just compete; it reimagines the category around software intelligence, ergonomic design, and long-term usability.
In 2024, Google hasn’t just caught up—it’s set a new benchmark. While Samsung still holds advantages in brand loyalty and ecosystem integration, the Pixel Fold proves that innovation isn’t solely about being first. It’s about being right. For consumers, this shift means better choices, faster progress, and ultimately, devices that adapt to life rather than complicate it.








浙公网安备
33010002000092号
浙B2-20120091-4
Comments
No comments yet. Why don't you start the discussion?