Radiography X Ray Machine Analog Overview: Key Features, Specifications, and Industrial Applications Explained

Types of Analog X-ray Machines

Analog radiography equipment may not be as advanced as digital imaging systems, but it remains a reliable and cost-effective solution in various medical and industrial environments. Despite the rise of digital technology, analog X-ray machines continue to play a vital role in diagnostic imaging, especially in regions with limited resources or specific operational needs.

These systems use photographic film to capture images, requiring chemical processing for development. While slower than digital methods, they offer proven image quality and durability when properly maintained. Below is a detailed breakdown of the most common types of analog X-ray machines and their specialized applications.

General-Purpose Analog X-ray Machines

Designed for routine diagnostic imaging, these are the most widely used analog systems in healthcare settings.

Advantages
  • Versatile for multiple imaging needs (chest, bones, abdomen)
  • Simple operation and maintenance
  • Cost-effective for high-volume clinics
  • Compatible with standard darkroom processing
Limitations
  • Film processing delays diagnosis
  • Limited image enhancement options
  • Requires storage space for physical films

Best for: Hospitals, outpatient clinics, general radiology departments

Fluoroscopic X-ray Machines

These systems provide real-time moving images, allowing clinicians to observe dynamic processes inside the body.

Advantages
  • Enables live imaging of internal motion (e.g., digestion, blood flow)
  • Essential for guided procedures (barium studies, catheter placement)
  • Some models support video recording for documentation
  • High temporal resolution for motion tracking
Limitations
  • Higher radiation exposure over time
  • Requires skilled operators for safe use
  • Bulkier setup with additional monitoring equipment

Best for: Gastrointestinal studies, interventional radiology, surgical guidance

Mobile & Orthopedic Analog X-ray Machines

Specially engineered for intraoperative and orthopedic imaging, often mounted near surgical tables.

Advantages
  • Real-time imaging during surgeries
  • Improves precision in fracture alignment and implant placement
  • Reduces need for post-op repeat imaging
  • Compact design fits into operating rooms
Limitations
  • Limited mobility compared to portable units
  • Higher maintenance due to frequent use
  • Requires radiation shielding in OR

Best for: Orthopedic surgery, trauma centers, intraoperative imaging

Dental Analog X-ray Machines

Compact, low-dose systems tailored for oral and maxillofacial imaging.

Advantages
  • Small footprint ideal for dental offices
  • Produces high-resolution images of teeth and jawbones
  • Supports both periapical and panoramic imaging
  • Lower radiation dose compared to general systems
Limitations
  • Very limited to dental applications only
  • Film processing adds time to diagnosis
  • Less ergonomic than digital sensors

Best for: Dental clinics, oral surgery, orthodontic planning

Portable Analog X-ray Machines

Lightweight, mobile units designed for bedside or field imaging where fixed systems aren't feasible.

Advantages
  • Highly mobile for emergency and ICU use
  • Enables imaging of immobile patients
  • Battery-powered options available
  • Delivers diagnostic-quality images despite size
Limitations
  • Lower power output than fixed units
  • Film processing still required
  • Limited positioning flexibility

Best for: Emergency rooms, intensive care units, rural clinics, disaster response

High-Energy Analog X-ray Machines

Industrial-grade systems designed for imaging dense materials or thick anatomical structures.

Advantages
  • Penetrates high-density materials (metal, concrete, thick tissue)
  • Used in non-destructive testing (NDT) and research
  • High kVp and mA settings for deep imaging
  • Durable construction for harsh environments
Limitations
  • Extremely high radiation output requires strict safety protocols
  • Not suitable for routine medical diagnostics
  • Expensive to operate and maintain

Best for: Industrial inspection, aerospace, nuclear medicine, research laboratories

Type Primary Use Mobility Radiation Output Ideal Environment
General-Purpose Routine diagnostics (bones, chest) Fixed Medium Hospitals, clinics
Fluoroscopic Real-time imaging (GI tract) Semi-mobile High (with prolonged use) Radiology suites, ORs
Mobile & Orthopedic Surgical imaging Fixed/Mounted Medium-High Operating rooms
Dental Oral imaging Fixed/Compact Low Dental offices
Portable Bedside imaging Highly Mobile Low-Medium ICUs, emergency settings
High-Energy Industrial/research imaging Fixed/Specialized Very High Factories, labs

Expert Tip: When using analog X-ray systems, proper film storage and chemical processing are crucial for image quality. Always maintain consistent developer temperatures and follow expiration dates to avoid degraded results.

Core Functions of Analog vs. Digital X-Ray Machines

The primary function of an analog x-ray machine is to generate x-rays and expose physical film to produce a diagnostic image. In contrast, a digital x-ray system captures and processes images electronically using digital detectors, enabling immediate viewing, enhanced image manipulation, and seamless integration with PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication Systems). Despite technological differences, both systems serve essential roles in medical imaging and share several foundational functions.

Key Functional Components of X-Ray Machines

X-Ray Generation

Both analog and digital x-ray machines generate x-rays using an x-ray tube, where high voltage accelerates electrons from the cathode to the anode, producing x-ray photons upon impact. The operator controls key parameters—such as kilovoltage peak (kVp), milliamperage (mA), and exposure time—to tailor the x-ray beam to the specific anatomical region and patient condition (e.g., higher kVp for chest imaging, lower for extremities).

In analog systems, precise manual calibration is critical due to the lack of post-exposure correction. Digital systems offer greater flexibility, often compensating for minor exposure errors through software enhancement.

Image Capture

Analog machines rely on radiographic film combined with intensifying screens inside a cassette. When exposed to x-rays, the screens fluoresce, exposing the film and creating a latent image that must be chemically developed. This process results in a fixed, physical image on hard copy film.

Digital systems use either computed radiography (CR) with photostimulable phosphor plates or direct digital radiography (DR) with flat-panel detectors to capture images electronically. These methods allow for immediate preview, dynamic range adjustment, and elimination of chemical processing.

Image Processing

In analog radiography, image processing occurs chemically in a darkroom using developer and fixer solutions. The quality of the final image depends heavily on processing time, temperature, and chemical freshness. Inconsistent processing can lead to underdeveloped, overdeveloped, or fogged images, reducing diagnostic accuracy.

Digital systems process images algorithmically, allowing for contrast adjustment, edge enhancement, noise reduction, and zoom capabilities. This digital workflow enhances diagnostic precision and supports remote consultation and long-term archival without degradation.

Manual Adjustments and Operator Control

Analog x-ray machines require skilled technicians to manually set exposure parameters based on patient size, anatomy, and clinical indication. There is no real-time feedback, so proper technique selection is crucial to avoid retakes, which increase radiation exposure.

While many digital systems offer automated exposure control (AEC) and preset protocols, manual adjustments are still valuable for complex cases. However, digital systems provide immediate image preview, enabling quick corrections without additional patient exposure in most cases.

Function Analog System Digital System
X-Ray Generation Manual control of kVp, mA, time; no exposure feedback Precise control with AEC options; real-time exposure indicators
Image Capture Film + intensifying screens; chemical development required CR plates or DR detectors; instant electronic capture
Image Processing Wet chemical processing; limited post-capture correction Digital enhancement (contrast, brightness, zoom); DICOM compatibility
Workflow Efficiency Slower due to film development and physical storage Faster imaging cycle; integration with EHR and PACS

Summary of Functional Differences

  • Diagnostic Flexibility: Digital systems offer superior post-processing capabilities, enabling radiologists to extract more information from a single exposure.
  • Radiation Efficiency: Digital detectors are generally more sensitive, allowing for lower patient doses while maintaining image quality.
  • Operational Skill: Analog systems demand higher technical expertise due to the absence of error correction, making proper training essential.
  • Cost and Maintenance: Analog machines have lower upfront costs but incur ongoing expenses for film, chemicals, and storage. Digital systems have higher initial investment but reduce long-term operational costs.
  • Environmental Impact: Digital radiography eliminates the need for hazardous chemical developers and fixers, making it more environmentally sustainable.
  • Important: While digital x-ray technology offers numerous advantages, understanding analog systems remains valuable for facilities in resource-limited settings or for historical context in radiologic education. Proper training in both modalities ensures adaptability and a deeper comprehension of radiographic principles such as exposure latitude, contrast, and spatial resolution.

    Material & Durability of Analog X-Ray Machines

    An analog x-ray machine is composed of a variety of materials, each selected for its functional role in imaging, structural integrity, and radiation safety. The durability of these machines depends heavily on the quality and resilience of their core components, especially the x-ray tube, which operates under extreme thermal and electrical stress. Key materials such as steel, lead, glass, and specialized plastics are used throughout the system to ensure stability, safety, and performance. However, prolonged use, heat exposure, and radiation can degrade these materials over time, impacting both image quality and operational reliability.

    Machine Frame

    Constructed primarily from high-tensile steel, the frame provides a rigid and stable foundation for the entire x-ray system. This structural integrity is essential for precise alignment of imaging components and patient positioning.

    • Resists mechanical stress and vibration during operation
    • Prevents misalignment of critical imaging components
    • Often coated with anti-corrosive finishes to extend lifespan in clinical environments

    Durability note: Steel frames typically outlast other machine components when properly maintained.

    X-Ray Tubes

    The heart of the analog x-ray system, the glass-enclosed x-ray tube, generates radiation by accelerating electrons across a vacuum. These tubes are engineered for high thermal resistance but degrade over time due to filament wear and glass fatigue.

    • Internal tungsten filaments thin with repeated heating cycles
    • Glass envelopes may develop micro-cracks or clouding from thermal stress
    • Reduced tube efficiency leads to longer exposure times and lower image contrast

    Critical insight: Tube lifespan averages 5–7 years under moderate use; heavy clinical loads can reduce this significantly.

    Film Cassettes

    These essential imaging accessories use durable plastic or metal frames to securely hold radiographic film during exposure. Their design ensures consistent film positioning and protection from light and physical damage.

    • Plastic variants offer lightweight handling and resistance to corrosion
    • Metal casings provide enhanced durability in high-traffic departments
    • Internal intensifying screens degrade over time, reducing image brightness

    Best practice: Regular inspection for warping or light leaks helps maintain diagnostic image quality.

    Lead Shields & Filters

    Lead is used extensively in shielding and filtration to absorb stray radiation and protect both patients and operators. Its high density makes it ideal for radiation attenuation.

    • Lead aprons, collimators, and internal barriers maintain effectiveness for decades
    • Physical damage (cracks, creases) compromises protective integrity
    • Modern lead composites offer lighter weight with equivalent shielding

    Safety reminder: Annual inspection of lead components is recommended to ensure continued radiation safety.

    Control Panel Components

    Analog control panels feature metal knobs, plastic dials, and electromechanical switches designed for tactile feedback and long-term usability in clinical settings.

    • Metal components resist wear from frequent adjustment
    • Plastic parts may become brittle over time due to UV and chemical exposure
    • Switches and potentiometers can develop contact resistance, affecting exposure accuracy

    Maintenance tip: Clean with non-abrasive disinfectants to prevent surface degradation.

    Cables & Connectors

    These components transmit high-voltage power and control signals across the machine. Insulated with rubber and plastic, they are vulnerable to environmental and mechanical stress.

    • Rubber insulation hardens and cracks with age and radiation exposure
    • Frayed or damaged cables pose electrical hazards and signal interference
    • Connectors may loosen or corrode, leading to intermittent faults

    Proactive step: Replace cables every 5–7 years or sooner if signs of wear appear.

    Professional Insight: While analog x-ray machines are robust, their performance degrades gradually. A preventive maintenance schedule—including tube output testing, cable inspection, and lead integrity checks—can extend service life and ensure consistent diagnostic quality. Consider upgrading to digital systems for improved longevity and image consistency, especially in high-volume settings.

    Component Primary Material Durability Factors Lifespan (Typical)
    Machine Frame Steel High structural integrity, corrosion-resistant coating 10+ years
    X-Ray Tube Glass, Tungsten, Copper Thermal cycling, filament wear, vacuum integrity 5–7 years
    Film Cassettes Plastic/Metal + Screens Physical impact, screen phosphor degradation 7–10 years
    Lead Shields Lead or Lead Composite Cracking, creasing, oxidation 10–15+ years
    Control Panel Plastic, Metal, Rubber Switch wear, UV degradation, cleaning chemicals 8–12 years
    Cables & Connectors Rubber, Plastic, Copper Flexing, radiation exposure, oxidation 5–7 years

    Additional Durability Considerations

    • Environmental Exposure: Humidity, cleaning agents, and temperature fluctuations accelerate material degradation.
    • Usage Frequency: Machines in emergency departments or busy clinics experience faster wear than those in low-volume offices.
    • Heat Dissipation: Poor ventilation around the tube housing increases thermal stress and shortens component life.
    • Service History: Regular calibration and part replacement significantly extend operational lifespan.
    • Obsolescence: Availability of replacement parts for analog systems is decreasing, making long-term maintenance challenging.

    How to Choose Analog X-ray Machines: A Comprehensive Buyer’s Guide

    Selecting the right analog X-ray machine is a critical decision for medical facilities aiming to maintain reliable diagnostic imaging capabilities. While digital systems dominate modern radiology, analog X-ray machines remain in use due to their durability, lower initial investment, and compatibility with existing workflows in certain clinical settings. This guide outlines the key factors to consider when choosing an analog X-ray system, helping healthcare providers make informed decisions that align with their operational needs, budget, and patient care goals.

    Important Note: Analog X-ray technology relies on film-based imaging and chemical processing. Ensure compliance with radiation safety regulations and proper disposal protocols for hazardous materials such as developer and fixer chemicals.

    1. Purpose and Application

    The primary use case for your X-ray machine should be the foundation of your selection process. Different clinical environments demand different capabilities:

    • Fluoroscopic Systems: Ideal for real-time imaging applications such as gastrointestinal studies, angiography, or orthopedic procedures requiring live visualization. These machines offer continuous X-ray exposure and are typically used in specialized departments.
    • General Radiography Units: Best suited for standard diagnostic imaging in clinics, emergency rooms, and small hospitals. These systems are designed for capturing still images of bones, chest, and other anatomical structures using film cassettes.
    • Specialty Applications: Some analog units are optimized for dental, veterinary, or portable field use. Always match the machine's design to your intended patient population and imaging volume.

    Understanding your facility’s workflow, patient load, and diagnostic requirements will significantly narrow down suitable models and prevent over- or under-investment.

    2. Mobility and Size Considerations

    Space constraints and operational flexibility play a major role in equipment selection:

    • Fixed Installations: Stationary analog units are common in dedicated radiology rooms. They offer stability and consistent alignment but require permanent space allocation and structural reinforcement for floor mounting.
    • Portable Models: Mobile X-ray machines are essential for bedside imaging in hospitals or remote clinics. These units are compact, often on wheels, and can be transported between rooms or facilities. Ensure the model fits through standard doorways and operates efficiently on battery power when needed.
    • Compact Designs: For small clinics or space-limited environments, compact analog systems provide full functionality without requiring large rooms. Evaluate ceiling height, tube-to-table distance, and swing radius when installing.

    Measure your available space and assess transportation logistics before finalizing your purchase.

    3. Image Quality and Technical Performance

    While analog systems do not offer the dynamic range or post-processing capabilities of digital radiography, they can still produce high-quality diagnostic images when properly configured:

    • Resolution and Detail: Analog film typically provides excellent spatial resolution, making it effective for detecting fine bone fractures or subtle pathologies.
    • Adjustable Parameters: Look for machines with manual or semi-automatic control over exposure time, kilovoltage (kVp), and milliampere-seconds (mAs). These settings allow technologists to tailor the radiation dose and image contrast to patient size and anatomy.
    • Consistency: A reliable generator and consistent X-ray tube output are crucial for minimizing retakes and ensuring diagnostic accuracy.

    Regular calibration and quality control checks are essential to maintain optimal image quality over time.

    4. Availability of Accessories and Consumables

    Unlike digital systems, analog X-ray machines depend on physical consumables that must be continuously replenished:

    • Film and Cassettes: Confirm the availability of compatible film sizes (e.g., 14x17", 10x12") and ensure cassettes with functional intensifying screens are in good condition.
    • Processing Chemicals: Developer, fixer, and replenisher solutions are required for film development. Verify that these chemicals are still manufactured and accessible from reliable suppliers.
    • Spare Parts: Older or discontinued models may face challenges with replacement components such as tubes, timers, or control panels. Choose a model with ongoing manufacturer or third-party support.

    Before purchasing, contact suppliers to confirm long-term availability of critical consumables and service parts to avoid future operational disruptions.

    5. Budget and Total Cost of Ownership

    While analog X-ray machines often have a lower upfront cost than digital systems, the total cost of ownership should be carefully evaluated:

    • Initial Investment: Includes the machine, installation, room shielding, and safety certifications.
    • Ongoing Expenses: Factor in monthly or annual costs such as film, chemicals, maintenance contracts, calibration services, and staff training.
    • Service and Repairs: Analog units may require more frequent servicing due to mechanical wear. Ensure access to qualified technicians familiar with older technology.
    • Environmental Compliance: Proper disposal of chemical waste and expired films may incur additional fees depending on local regulations.

    Although analog systems generally have lower running costs than early digital models, they are less efficient in terms of labor and material usage. Consider this when planning long-term sustainability.

    Selection Criteria Key Questions to Ask Recommended Actions Potential Risks
    Purpose & Use Case Will you need real-time imaging or standard radiographs? Choose fluoroscopy for dynamic studies; general-purpose for static imaging Incorrect machine type leads to inefficiency or missed diagnoses
    Mobility Needs Do you need bedside imaging or fixed-room installation? Select portable units for mobility; fixed systems for high-volume clinics Poor fit in workspace or inability to transport when needed
    Image Consistency Are exposure controls adjustable and reliable? Test machine with varying settings and review sample images Inconsistent exposure leads to retakes and increased radiation dose
    Supply Chain Are films, chemicals, and parts readily available? Verify supplier inventory and lead times before purchase Operational halt due to unavailable consumables
    Total Cost What are the 5-year operating costs? Calculate film, chemical, service, and disposal expenses annually Unexpected costs strain budget and reduce ROI

    Expert Tip: If you're considering an analog system due to budget constraints, explore refurbished or gently used units from reputable dealers. Many come with warranties and service support, offering a cost-effective middle ground between new analog and full digital conversion.

    Additional Considerations

    • Staff Training: Ensure radiologic technologists are proficient in analog techniques, including proper film handling, exposure calculation, and darkroom procedures.
    • Radiation Safety: Maintain up-to-date shielding, use lead aprons, and follow ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principles to minimize exposure.
    • Future-Proofing: Consider whether your facility may transition to digital radiography in the next 5–10 years. Some analog rooms can be upgraded with CR (Computed Radiography) readers for a hybrid approach.
    • Regulatory Compliance: Verify that the machine meets FDA, CE, or local health authority standards for medical devices.

    Choosing an analog X-ray machine requires careful evaluation of clinical needs, logistical constraints, and long-term operational costs. While these systems are increasingly rare in advanced healthcare settings, they remain viable options for resource-limited environments or specialized applications. By focusing on purpose, quality, support, and sustainability, you can select a reliable analog X-ray solution that delivers consistent diagnostic value for years to come.

    Frequently Asked Questions About Analog X-ray Machines

    Q1: What is the benefit of having Analog X-ray machines when there are Digital ones?

    Despite the rapid advancement of digital imaging technology, analog X-ray machines continue to serve a valuable role in medical and industrial settings due to several key advantages:

    • Cost-Effectiveness: Analog systems are significantly more affordable to purchase and maintain, making them ideal for small clinics, rural healthcare centers, or facilities with limited budgets.
    • Simplicity of Operation: Their design closely mirrors traditional film-based photography, requiring minimal technical training. This makes them accessible to technicians in regions with limited access to advanced training programs.
    • High Image Clarity for Specific Uses: For bone imaging and basic radiography, analog machines often produce exceptionally sharp and detailed images, especially when high-quality films and proper exposure techniques are used.
    • Lower Infrastructure Demands: Unlike digital systems, they don’t require computers, specialized software, network integration, or digital storage solutions—reducing both complexity and long-term IT costs.

    While digital X-rays offer benefits like faster processing and image enhancement, many institutions still rely on analog systems as a reliable, low-maintenance alternative that delivers consistent diagnostic results for routine procedures.

    Q2: Are Analog X-ray machines still usable in emergencies?

    Yes, analog X-ray machines—particularly portable models—remain highly effective in emergency and field scenarios. Their continued relevance stems from several practical advantages:

    • Portability and Durability: Many analog units are compact, lightweight, and built with robust mechanical components, allowing them to be easily transported to emergency rooms, accident sites, or mobile clinics.
    • Quick Deployment: With fewer electronic components and no dependency on digital interfaces or power-intensive systems, analog machines can be set up and operated rapidly during time-sensitive situations.
    • Reliability in Challenging Environments: In areas with unstable power supplies or harsh conditions (e.g., disaster zones or remote locations), analog systems often perform more reliably than their digital counterparts.
    • Proven Track Record: Decades of use in critical care settings have demonstrated their effectiveness for immediate fracture assessment, chest imaging, and trauma evaluation.

    Although portable digital X-rays are increasingly common, analog machines remain a trusted backup or primary tool in many emergency medical services due to their simplicity and dependability.

    Q3: Do analog machines expose patients to more or less radiation than digital X-ray systems?

    Radiation exposure is not inherently determined by whether a system is analog or digital—it depends more on machine calibration, technique, and operator practices. However, there are important distinctions to consider:

    • Efficiency Differences: Digital detectors are generally more sensitive to X-rays, meaning they can produce high-quality images with lower radiation doses compared to traditional film-based analog systems.
    • Modern Analog Upgrades: Some newer analog machines incorporate dose-reduction technologies such as automatic exposure control, improved collimation, and high-efficiency grids, helping minimize patient exposure.
    • Operator Influence: Proper technique—such as accurate positioning, correct kVp/mAs settings, and tight beam collimation—plays a crucial role in reducing unnecessary radiation regardless of system type.
    • Repeat Exposure Risk: Analog systems may require retakes if film processing is flawed or exposure is incorrect, potentially increasing overall radiation exposure—a risk largely mitigated in digital systems with instant preview capabilities.

    To ensure safety, all facilities using analog X-ray equipment should adhere to ALARA principles (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) and conduct regular equipment inspections and staff training.

    Q4: How does the image quality of modern analog X-ray machines compare to those from their heyday?

    Image quality in analog X-ray technology has significantly improved since its early days, thanks to advancements in both hardware and processing techniques:

    • Historical Challenges: Early analog systems often suffered from inconsistent image quality due to under- or over-exposure, poor film development, and inadequate shielding, leading to blurred or low-contrast images.
    • Modern Improvements: Today’s analog machines use higher-resolution films, better X-ray tubes, advanced intensifying screens, and automated film processors that deliver sharper, more consistent images with enhanced contrast and detail.
    • Consistency and Reliability: With standardized protocols and quality control measures, modern analog systems produce diagnostically reliable images—particularly for skeletal imaging, dental radiography, and chest X-rays.
    • Limitations: While image clarity has improved, analog systems still lack the post-processing capabilities (e.g., zoom, contrast adjustment, digital enhancement) available in digital radiography.

    When properly maintained and operated, contemporary analog X-ray machines can rival the diagnostic accuracy of digital systems for many routine applications, especially where fine bony detail is essential.

    Q5: Is there any significance of Analog X-ray machines in industrial applications?

    Yes, analog X-ray technology plays a critical role in various industrial sectors, particularly in non-destructive testing (NDT) and quality assurance processes:

    • Weld Inspection: Analog X-rays are widely used to detect cracks, porosity, inclusions, and other flaws in welded joints, especially in pipelines, pressure vessels, and structural steel.
    • Material Integrity Testing: Industries such as aerospace, automotive, and construction rely on analog radiography to assess internal defects in castings, forgings, and composite materials without damaging the component.
    • High-Energy Applications: Certain industrial analog systems operate at very high voltages (up to several MeV), enabling penetration of thick metal sections where digital detectors may not be suitable or cost-effective.
    • Regulatory Compliance: In sectors like oil and gas and aviation, analog radiographic films are often accepted as legal documentation for inspection records due to their permanence, traceability, and resistance to digital tampering.
    • Field Use: Mobile analog units are frequently deployed on construction sites, offshore platforms, and remote locations where ruggedness and independence from complex digital infrastructure are essential.

    Despite the rise of digital radiography, analog X-ray remains a trusted, standardized method in industrial NDT, valued for its proven reliability, regulatory acceptance, and ability to deliver high-resolution images for safety-critical inspections.

    Article Rating

    ★ 5.0 (40 reviews)
    Jordan Ellis

    Jordan Ellis

    Curiosity fuels everything I do. I write across industries—exploring innovation, design, and strategy that connect seemingly different worlds. My goal is to help professionals and creators discover insights that inspire growth, simplify complexity, and celebrate progress wherever it happens.