When upgrading your PC storage, choosing between Samsung's flagship NVMe SSDs—specifically the 990 EVO and its predecessor, the 980—can be a tough decision. Both drives promise solid performance, reliability, and compatibility with modern systems, but the question remains: does the newer 990 EVO deliver enough of an improvement to justify the cost over the still-competent 980? For gamers and everyday users alike, the answer depends on workload sensitivity, budget constraints, and long-term usage goals.
The 990 EVO isn't just another incremental update—it introduces architectural refinements, better power efficiency, and enhanced sequential speeds. But real-world benefits don’t always align with spec-sheet superiority. This article breaks down every critical aspect—from raw benchmarks to thermal behavior and longevity—to help you decide whether stepping up from the 980 to the 990 EVO makes sense for your setup.
Performance Benchmarks: Real-World Gains in Speed and Responsiveness
Samsung claims the 990 EVO offers up to 7,450 MB/s read and 6,900 MB/s write speeds, compared to the 980’s 3,500 MB/s read and 3,000 MB/s write. That’s more than double in some cases, but only under ideal conditions using PCIe Gen4 x4 interfaces. The jump sounds impressive, but how much of it translates into actual user experience?
In synthetic benchmarks like CrystalDiskMark and AS SSD, the 990 EVO consistently outperforms the 980 by a wide margin. However, when moving large game files (e.g., installing a 100GB title like *Cyberpunk 2077*), the practical difference is often less dramatic. The 980 completes such transfers in about 1 minute 30 seconds over a Gen3 interface, while the 990 EVO cuts that down to around 50 seconds on a compatible Gen4 motherboard.
For boot times and application launches, both drives feel snappy. Windows 11 boots in under 8 seconds on either, and Adobe Photoshop opens nearly instantaneously. The noticeable gap emerges during sustained workloads—video editing, loading massive datasets, or multitasking with multiple high-res applications open simultaneously.
Differences in Architecture and Efficiency
The 990 EVO uses Samsung’s next-generation Phoenix controller and updated V-NAND technology, allowing for improved power efficiency and reduced heat output under load. It consumes approximately 30% less energy during idle states and maintains cooler temperatures during extended writes—a key advantage for compact builds or laptops where thermal headroom is limited.
In contrast, the 980 relies on the older Elpis controller and lacks some of the dynamic frequency scaling features found in the 990 EVO. While this doesn’t impact day-to-day usability significantly, it can lead to throttling in small-form-factor PCs without adequate airflow.
Another subtle but meaningful improvement is in random read/write performance. The 990 EVO achieves up to 1,400K IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) for reads, compared to the 980’s 680K. This matters most when dealing with thousands of small files—such as loading game assets in open-world titles or navigating complex project directories in creative software.
“Modern games are becoming increasingly dependent on fast random access rather than pure throughput. A drive like the 990 EVO gives developers more headroom to stream textures seamlessly.” — David Lin, Senior Systems Engineer at a leading game optimization firm
Comparison Table: Key Specifications Side-by-Side
| Feature | Samsung 990 EVO | Samsung 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe Gen4 x4 | PCIe Gen3 x4 |
| Sequential Read | Up to 7,450 MB/s | Up to 3,500 MB/s |
| Sequential Write | Up to 6,900 MB/s | Up to 3,000 MB/s |
| Random Read (IOPS) | Up to 1,400K | Up to 680K |
| Random Write (IOPS) | Up to 1,500K | Up to 800K |
| Controller | Phoenix | Elpis |
| NAND Type | 9th Gen V-NAND | 6th Gen V-NAND |
| Endurance (TBW)* | 600 TBW (1TB model) | 600 TBW (1TB model) |
| Power Consumption | Lower active/idle draw | Higher under load |
*TBW = Total Bytes Written over lifespan
Real-World Use Case: Gaming and Daily Productivity
Consider Alex, a mid-tier PC gamer who also works remotely in graphic design. His current rig runs an AMD Ryzen 5 5600X with a B550 motherboard and a Samsung 980 1TB SSD. He upgraded to the 990 EVO primarily to reduce level-load stuttering in *Elden Ring* and improve responsiveness when switching between Photoshop, Chrome, and Discord.
After installation, he noticed faster map transitions in games with dense asset streaming, especially in ray-traced modes where texture demands spike. In daily use, system wake-from-sleep was quicker, and exporting layered PSD files to external storage showed a ~15% time reduction. However, general web browsing and media playback remained indistinguishable.
The biggest win came during OS updates and major software installations. Windows Feature Updates applied 40% faster, and Steam library reinstallation after a clean OS wipe took half the time thanks to the 990 EVO’s superior sustained write speeds.
For casual users who mainly browse, stream, and play lighter indie titles, the 980 remains more than sufficient. But for those pushing their systems with AAA gaming, content creation, or heavy multitasking, the 990 EVO delivers tangible quality-of-life improvements.
Is the Upgrade Worth It? A Practical Checklist
Before deciding whether to upgrade from the 980 to the 990 EVO, evaluate your specific situation using this checklist:
- ✅ Do you have a PCIe Gen4-compatible motherboard and CPU?
- ✅ Are you frequently transferring large files (games, videos, datasets)?
- ✅ Do you experience lag when loading complex games or multitasking?
- ✅ Is your current SSD nearing capacity or showing signs of slowdown?
- ❌ Are you on a tight budget and satisfied with current performance?
- ❌ Does your system bottleneck elsewhere (e.g., slow GPU or insufficient RAM)?
If most of your answers are “yes” to the positives and “no” to the negatives, the 990 EVO is a justified upgrade. Otherwise, the 980 continues to offer excellent value, particularly if purchased at a discount.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use the 990 EVO in a PCIe Gen3 slot?
Yes, the 990 EVO is backward compatible with PCIe Gen3. However, you’ll only achieve speeds comparable to high-end Gen3 drives (~3,500 MB/s), negating much of its advantage. To fully benefit, ensure your platform supports PCIe Gen4.
Does the 990 EVO come with better software support?
Both drives are supported by Samsung Magician software, which provides firmware updates, health monitoring, and performance optimization. The 990 EVO includes enhanced thermal alerts and adaptive boosting features within the latest version of the tool, giving slightly better oversight.
Is there a significant difference in lifespan?
No. Both the 990 EVO and 980 (1TB models) are rated for 600 TBW of total writes. With typical consumer usage, either drive should last 5–7 years or longer. The 990 EVO’s improved efficiency may reduce wear over time, but not enough to meaningfully extend longevity under normal conditions.
Final Verdict: When to Upgrade and When to Wait
The Samsung 990 EVO represents a meaningful step forward in NVMe SSD technology, particularly for users with modern platforms capable of leveraging PCIe Gen4 bandwidth. Its superior random performance, lower latency, and better thermals make it ideal for gamers seeking smoother asset streaming and professionals handling intensive workflows.
However, if you’re already using a 980 on a Gen3 system, the real-world gains may not justify the upgrade cost unless you're building or upgrading your entire platform anyway. The 980 remains a reliable, fast option for everyday computing and mainstream gaming.
Ultimately, the decision hinges on your ecosystem readiness and performance expectations. For new builds or recent-gen systems, the 990 EVO is the smarter long-term investment. For existing setups, hold off unless you’re hitting clear storage or speed bottlenecks.








浙公网安备
33010002000092号
浙B2-20120091-4
Comments
No comments yet. Why don't you start the discussion?