Shark Flexstyle Vs Dyson Airwrap Is The Dyson Really Worth The Price Difference

When it comes to at-home hairstyling tools, two names dominate the conversation: Dyson and Shark. The Dyson Airwrap revolutionized the market when it launched in 2018 with its Coanda airflow technology and premium design. Now, Shark has entered the ring with its FlexStyle system—offering similar functionality at a fraction of the cost. But does the lower price mean compromised performance? Or can Shark’s offering genuinely rival Dyson’s cult-favorite tool?

This comparison dives deep into both devices—not just on specs, but on real usability, styling results, durability, and long-term value—to answer one pressing question: Is the Dyson Airwrap truly worth nearly double the price of the Shark FlexStyle?

Technology and Core Functionality

The fundamental appeal of both tools lies in their ability to dry, curl, smooth, and volumize hair using air instead of direct heat contact. This reduces damage compared to traditional tongs or flat irons.

The Dyson Airwrap uses patented Coanda effect technology, where high-speed air flows along a surface to attract and wrap hair around the barrel without clamps. It includes multiple attachments: two 1.2” and 1.6” round brushes, soft and firm smoothing brushes, and curling barrels for left and right directions.

The Shark FlexStyle, while not branded with a proprietary term like “Coanda,” operates on a similar principle: directional airflow guides hair around the barrel. It comes with three key attachments—a 1” volumizing round brush, a 1.25” smoothing brush, and dual-direction curlers (1.25” diameter). Both systems use digital motors and claim controlled heat output to minimize damage.

“Tools that leverage airflow over direct heat represent a major shift in home styling. They’re not just about convenience—they reduce thermal stress significantly.” — Dr. Lisa Chen, Trichologist & Hair Health Researcher

While Dyson’s engineering feels more refined—with smoother airflow transitions and quieter operation—Shark delivers surprisingly consistent results given its simpler motor design. In side-by-side tests, both tools effectively styled medium-length, wavy hair in under 30 minutes.

Performance Comparison: Real-World Styling Results

To assess true performance, we evaluated both tools across several hair types and desired styles:

• Fine, straight hair: Dyson produced longer-lasting volume, especially at the roots. Shark created lift but required light hairspray to maintain hold through the day.
• Thick, wavy hair: Both tools smoothed frizz well, though Dyson’s firm smoothing brush offered tighter control. Shark needed slower pass speeds to achieve comparable sleekness.
• Curls (Type 2A–2B): Dyson excelled at enhancing natural waves with defined separation. Shark tended to loosen curls slightly more than intended, requiring manual redefinition post-styling.
• Short bobs or layers: Shark’s smaller round brush edge gave better access to shorter sections. Dyson’s larger brush struggled near the nape without additional tools.

Tip: For best results with either device, start with damp (not wet) hair towel-dried or lightly patted with a microfiber cloth. Overly wet hair reduces airflow efficiency.

Heat Control and Safety Features

Both models feature intelligent heat regulation. The Dyson Airwrap samples air temperature 40 times per second, adjusting output to prevent extreme spikes. Shark uses a dual-sensor system that monitors inlet and outlet temperatures, which is impressive for its price point.

Dyson maintains a maximum of 150°C (302°F), while Shark caps at 170°C (338°F)—slightly higher, but still within safe limits for most hair types when used correctly. However, users with fine or chemically treated hair may prefer Dyson’s gentler peak temperature.

Detailed Feature Comparison Table

Feature	Dyson Airwrap Complete Long	Shark FlexStyle Styling System
Price (MSRP)	$599.99	$299.99
Motor Type	Digital Motor V9	DualForce Digital Motor
Noise Level	~75 dB (quieter)	~85 dB (noticeably louder)
Battery/Power	Corded only	Corded only
Attachments Included	6 (curlers L/R, round brushes, smoothing brushes)	3 (round brush, smoothing brush, dual curler)
Max Temperature	150°C	170°C
Weight	1.8 lbs	1.6 lbs
Warranty	2 years	2 years

User Experience and Daily Practicality

One area where Shark gains an edge is ergonomics. At 1.6 pounds, the FlexStyle feels lighter and more balanced during extended use. Its swivel cord also prevents tangling—an often-overlooked detail that improves maneuverability.

Dyson’s build quality remains superior: matte finish resists fingerprints, buttons click with precision, and the magnetic attachment system snaps securely into place. Shark’s plastic housing feels sturdier than expected but shows visible scuff marks after repeated use.

Storage is another differentiator. Dyson includes a sleek dock for charging and organizing attachments. Shark provides a basic stand, but no integrated storage—users must rely on drawers or cases.

Mini Case Study: A Working Professional’s Morning Routine

Sarah, a 34-year-old marketing director with shoulder-length, color-treated hair, tested both tools over four weeks. She typically has 25 minutes in the morning to style her hair before video calls.

With the Dyson, she achieved salon-like blowouts consistently, with volume lasting until evening. The learning curve was steep initially—figuring out tension and speed took about five sessions. Once mastered, her routine stabilized at 22 minutes.

Switching to Shark, she noticed the noise made her partner complain from the next room. However, the lighter weight reduced wrist fatigue. Her style held well but began flattening by midday unless she reapplied mousse. Total time: 25–28 minutes.

Verdict: “I’d choose Dyson for weekends or events, but Shark gets the weekday nod because it’s easier on my joints and doesn’t break the bank.”

Value Proposition: Is the Price Difference Justified?

At $300 less, the Shark FlexStyle clearly wins on upfront cost. But value isn’t just about price—it’s performance, longevity, and user satisfaction over time.

Dyson’s reputation for durability supports its premium pricing. Many users report functional Airwraps after five years. Shark has yet to prove long-term reliability, though early reviews suggest solid construction.

Consider this: If you style your hair daily and prioritize flawless results, Dyson’s consistency, quieter operation, and advanced attachments justify the investment. But if you style 2–3 times per week and want good results without overspending, Shark delivers 80% of the performance at half the price.

Checklist: Choosing Between Shark FlexStyle and Dyson Airwrap

1. ✅ Assess your styling frequency: Daily use leans toward Dyson; occasional use favors Shark.
2. ✅ Evaluate your hair type: Thick, curly, or hard-to-tame hair benefits more from Dyson’s power and attachments.
3. ✅ Consider noise sensitivity: Shark is noticeably louder—important if sharing space.
4. ✅ Test handling comfort: Lighter weight (Shark) may matter if you have hand or wrist strain.
5. ✅ Check for deals: Dyson rarely discounts, but Shark frequently drops to $229 during sales.
6. ✅ Think long-term: Dyson holds resale value better if you plan to upgrade later.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use the Shark FlexStyle on very short hair?

Yes. The 1” round brush works well on short layers and bobs. While Dyson lacks a small round brush option in most kits, Shark includes one standard, making it more versatile for shorter styles.

Does the Dyson Airwrap work on thick, coarse hair?

Absolutely. Its higher-powered motor and firm smoothing brush are designed for dense textures. Users with thick hair consistently report better frizz control and faster drying times with Dyson versus other tools.

Are replacement parts expensive for either brand?

Shark replacement attachments average $25–$35 each. Dyson replacements range from $50–$70. Third-party alternatives exist for both, but quality varies. Original accessories are recommended for optimal safety and function.

Final Verdict: Making the Right Choice for You

The Dyson Airwrap is not objectively “better” than the Shark FlexStyle in every scenario—it’s better suited for specific needs. If you demand elite performance, whisper-quiet operation, and have the budget, Dyson earns its status. It’s a luxury appliance for hair care, much like a high-end espresso machine versus a reliable drip brewer.

But Shark FlexStyle proves that innovation doesn’t have to come at a luxury price. For most people, it delivers professional-quality results with thoughtful design touches. It’s particularly compelling for beginners, those with shorter hair, or anyone unwilling to spend close to $600 on a single styling tool.

In the end, the decision hinges on how much you value refinement over practicality. The Dyson is worth the price difference if you’ll use it heavily and appreciate engineering excellence. But if you want capable performance without financial strain, the Shark FlexStyle offers exceptional value—and might just be the smarter everyday choice.

🚀 Ready to make your decision? Try renting both tools through beauty subscription services before buying, or check return policies to test them risk-free. Your perfect styling match is out there—now you’ve got the insights to find it.