Why Are Executive Orders Allowed Understanding Presidential Power

In the United States, the president wields significant authority—not only through legislation signed into law but also through unilateral actions known as executive orders. These directives have shaped national policy on civil rights, immigration, military operations, and emergency response. Yet many Americans question: Why are executive orders even allowed? How can a single official issue binding instructions without congressional approval? The answer lies in the structure of the Constitution, historical precedent, and the practical demands of governance.

Executive orders are not mentioned by name in the U.S. Constitution, yet they remain a legal and functional tool of presidential leadership. Understanding their legitimacy requires examining constitutional interpretation, separation of powers, and real-world examples where presidents have used these tools to act decisively—sometimes controversially.

The Constitutional Basis of Executive Power

The foundation for executive orders rests primarily in Article II of the U.S. Constitution, which vests \"the executive Power\" in the President of the United States. Section 1 states clearly: “The executive Power shall be vested in a President.” While this clause does not explicitly mention executive orders, courts and legal scholars have long interpreted it as granting the president broad authority to manage the federal government and ensure that laws are faithfully executed.

Additionally, Section 3 of Article II requires the president to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” This provision has been central to justifying executive orders, especially those related to administrative oversight, enforcement priorities, or reorganization of federal agencies.

“The President’s power, if any, must stem either from an act of Congress or from the Constitution itself.” — Justice Robert H. Jackson, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952)

This landmark Supreme Court decision reinforced that while the president has inherent executive authority, it is not unlimited. Executive orders must align with statutory or constitutional powers and cannot override laws passed by Congress.

How Executive Orders Work: Function and Limits

An executive order is a directive issued by the president that manages operations of the federal government. It has the force of law but applies only to federal agencies and officials unless it exercises authority granted under existing statutes that affect private citizens.

For example, President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Executive Order 9066 authorized the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, citing military necessity. While legally issued at the time, it was later widely condemned and formally apologized for by Congress. This illustrates both the power and potential abuse of such orders.

Key characteristics of executive orders include:

• They do not require congressional approval.
• They can be challenged in court.
• They may be revoked or modified by future presidents.
• They cannot create new spending or taxation—only Congress holds the purse strings.
• They must operate within the boundaries of existing law and the Constitution.

Tip: Not all presidential directives are formal executive orders; some take the form of memoranda, proclamations, or national security directives, which carry similar weight but follow different procedures.

A Historical Timeline of Key Executive Orders

Executive orders have played pivotal roles throughout American history. Below is a timeline highlighting major uses and turning points:

1. 1863 – Emancipation Proclamation (Lincoln): Though technically a proclamation, it functioned like an executive order, freeing enslaved people in Confederate-held territory using wartime authority.
2. 1933 – Bank Holiday (FDR): Closed banks nationwide during the Great Depression to prevent collapse, restoring public confidence.
3. 1942 – Japanese Internment (FDR): EO 9066 led to forced relocation of over 100,000 Japanese Americans—a stark reminder of unchecked executive action.
4. 1948 – Desegregation of Armed Forces (Truman): EO 9981 ended racial segregation in the military, advancing civil rights despite political resistance.
5. 1957 – Little Rock Integration (Eisenhower): Sent federal troops to enforce school desegregation, asserting federal authority over state defiance.
6. 2012 – DACA (Obama): Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals protected eligible undocumented immigrants brought as children from deportation.
7. 2017 – Travel Ban (Trump): Restricted entry from several Muslim-majority countries; initially blocked by courts before being upheld in revised form.
8. 2021 – Climate Initiatives (Biden): Reversed numerous Trump-era environmental rollbacks via executive action.

This progression shows how presidents use executive orders to respond swiftly to crises, set policy direction, and fill legislative gaps—especially when Congress is gridlocked.

Checks and Balances: Can Executive Orders Be Stopped?

While powerful, executive orders are subject to multiple checks:

Check	Description
Judicial Review	Courts can invalidate orders that exceed constitutional or statutory authority. Example: The Supreme Court struck down Truman’s steel mill seizure in Youngstown (1952).
Congressional Override	Congress can pass legislation to countermand an order, though presidential veto remains a hurdle. It can also refuse funding for implementation.
Presidential Reversal	New administrations often rescind prior orders. Biden reversed dozens of Trump’s orders on Day One.
Public and Media Scrutiny	Political backlash can limit a president’s ability to enforce controversial directives.

No executive order is permanent. Their durability depends on legal soundness, political support, and whether future leaders choose to uphold them.

Mini Case Study: DACA and the Limits of Executive Authority

In 2012, President Obama created the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program via executive action after Congress failed to pass the DREAM Act. DACA provided temporary protection from deportation and work authorization for hundreds of thousands of undocumented youth.

While not granting legal status, it relied on prosecutorial discretion—an established principle allowing federal agencies to prioritize enforcement resources. However, opponents argued that bypassing Congress violated the separation of powers.

In 2021, a federal judge ruled DACA unlawful, though allowed current recipients to retain benefits. The case highlights a key tension: Even well-intentioned executive actions face legal challenges when perceived as overstepping legislative authority.

DACA remains in place pending appeal, demonstrating how courts serve as a critical check—but also how prolonged litigation creates uncertainty for affected individuals.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a president use an executive order to make new laws?

No. Executive orders cannot create new statutory laws. They can only direct how existing laws are implemented or exercised within the bounds of presidential authority.

Do executive orders need to be approved by anyone?

No formal approval is required, but they are published in the Federal Register and numbered sequentially. Major orders often undergo review by the Office of Management and Budget and the Department of Justice to ensure legality.

How many executive orders has a typical president issued?

The number varies widely. FDR issued over 3,700 due to the scale of New Deal programs and WWII. Modern presidents average between 30 and 100 per term. Biden issued 77 in his first year; Trump issued 137, one of the highest totals for a first-year modern president.

Actionable Checklist: Evaluating Executive Orders

To critically assess any executive order, consider the following steps:

1. Identify the legal basis: Does it cite constitutional authority or specific statutes?
2. Review its scope: Is it directing internal agency operations or changing rights/obligations for the public?
3. Check for consistency with existing law: Could it conflict with current legislation?
4. Monitor judicial response: Has it been challenged in court? What was the outcome?
5. Assess longevity: Is it likely to survive changes in administration or congressional action?

Tip: Follow the Federal Register (federalregister.gov) to read newly issued executive orders and track their implementation across agencies.

Conclusion: Power with Responsibility

Executive orders are allowed because the U.S. system recognizes that effective governance sometimes demands swift, decisive action—especially when Congress is unable or unwilling to act. Rooted in constitutional authority and refined through centuries of practice, they enable presidents to lead the executive branch, respond to emergencies, and shape national policy.

But with great power comes accountability. History shows that while executive orders can drive progress—from ending segregation to protecting vulnerable populations—they can also provoke controversy and legal challenge when seen as overreach.

Ultimately, the legitimacy of executive orders depends not just on legal grounding, but on transparency, necessity, and respect for democratic norms.

🚀 Stay informed. Understand the policies shaping your country. Share this article to help others grasp the balance of presidential power—and the safeguards that keep it in check.