For centuries, mariners have referred to ships as “she,” a practice deeply woven into the fabric of seafaring culture. Whether in poetry, logbooks, or casual conversation, vessels—regardless of name or function—are often personified as female. This linguistic tradition persists today, even as modern fleets grow more diverse and inclusive. But where did this custom originate? Is it rooted in grammar, emotion, or something deeper in human psychology? Understanding why ships are called \"she\" requires a journey through language, history, and the soul of seafaring itself.
The Linguistic Roots of Gendered Ships
In many languages, nouns carry grammatical gender—masculine, feminine, or neuter—even when they refer to inanimate objects. English has largely shed grammatical gender, but remnants remain, especially in specialized contexts like ship naming. In Romance languages such as Spanish, French, and Italian, the word for “ship” is grammatically feminine: *la nave*, *le navire*, *la barca*. This linguistic pattern likely influenced early English sailors, who adopted the feminine pronoun by association.
Old English also had gendered nouns, and while the language evolved away from this system, poetic and ceremonial uses preserved certain conventions. The sea itself was often referred to as feminine—\"Mother Sea\" or \"Lady Ocean\"—and ships, as protectors and providers across its surface, were naturally aligned with that imagery. Naming a ship felt less like assigning an object and more like welcoming a companion, one deserving of respect and affection.
A Historical Journey: When Did Ships Become “She”?
Evidence of ships being referred to as female dates back to ancient civilizations. Egyptian hieroglyphs depict deities blessing vessels using feminine epithets. Greek and Roman literature often portrayed ships as extensions of goddesses or nymphs, guiding heroes across treacherous waters. In Norse sagas, longships were given names evoking fertility, protection, and grace—qualities traditionally associated with femininity in those cultures.
By the Age of Sail (15th–19th centuries), the practice was firmly established in European navies. British Royal Navy records consistently used “she” when referring to warships. Logbooks, commissioning documents, and crew testimonials all reflect this convention. One 18th-century captain wrote: “We treated our ship as a lady—fed her well with ballast, dressed her sails with pride, and never let her face danger unprepared.”
This wasn’t mere whimsy. For sailors spending months at sea, the ship was their entire world—home, shelter, and lifeline. Personifying her as a woman helped foster loyalty, morale, and a sense of duty. She wasn’t just wood and canvas; she was a living presence demanding care and courage.
Symbols and Superstitions: The Emotional Bond
The relationship between sailor and ship transcended utility. On long voyages, crews developed deep emotional attachments. A well-handled vessel could mean survival; a neglected one, disaster. Many believed that treating the ship with respect—keeping her clean, honoring her name, speaking kindly—would bring good fortune. Conversely, disrespecting the ship, such as swearing aboard or renaming her without ceremony, was thought to invite storms or misfortune.
Bow figures, or figureheads, reinforced this bond. Carved into the prow of most large ships from the 1600s onward, these sculptures were almost always female—goddesses, queens, mermaids, or allegorical figures like Victory or Liberty. They weren’t just decoration; they were spiritual guardians, watching over the crew and embodying the ship’s identity. To see “her face” emerging from the fog was a powerful moment—a sign that the ship was leading them home.
“She was more than timber and iron. She breathed with the wind, wept in the rain, and carried us like a mother bears her children.” — Captain Elias Merton, 1832 logbook entry
Modern Perspectives and Evolving Language
In recent decades, the tradition of calling ships “she” has faced scrutiny. As more women enter maritime professions—from deckhands to admirals—the gendered language can feel outdated or exclusionary. Some argue that referring to machines as female reinforces stereotypes or diminishes the role of real women at sea.
Naval institutions have responded differently. The U.S. Navy officially permits either “she” or “it” when referring to ships, leaving the choice to individual preference. The Royal Navy still widely uses “she” in formal communications, citing tradition. Meanwhile, commercial shipping lines often adopt neutral language in technical documentation, though crews may still use “she” informally.
Despite shifts in usage, the emotional core of the tradition endures. Even today, sailors speak of “bringing her into port” or “she handled beautifully in heavy seas.” The pronoun carries warmth, respect, and a sense of partnership—not gender per se, but humanity.
Do’s and Don’ts of Maritime Tradition
| Do’s | Don’ts |
|---|---|
| Use “she” respectfully, acknowledging tradition and emotional significance | Assume all mariners prefer gendered language |
| Honor a ship’s name and history during ceremonies | Mock or dismiss others’ attachment to traditional terms |
| Recognize the symbolic nature of personification | Use gendered terms to undermine female crew members |
| Educate newcomers about the cultural context behind “she” | Enforce the tradition rigidly in diverse or professional settings |
Real Example: The USS Constitution and the Living Legacy
No example better illustrates the enduring power of this tradition than the USS Constitution, launched in 1797 and still a commissioned vessel in the U.S. Navy. Affectionately known as “Old Ironsides,” she is routinely referred to as “she” in official tours and naval publications. Crew members assigned to her maintenance speak of “taking care of her” with evident pride.
During a 2012 public voyage, a young midshipman was asked why they still call the ship “she.” He replied, “Because she’s not just a museum piece. She sailed in wars, survived hurricanes, and brought sailors home. You don’t call that ‘it.’ You call her ‘she’ because she earned it.” This sentiment echoes across generations—proof that the tradition lives not in grammar, but in memory and meaning.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it incorrect to call a ship “it” instead of “she”?
No. While “she” remains common in traditional and informal contexts, “it” is grammatically correct and increasingly accepted, especially in technical or inclusive environments. The choice often depends on tone, audience, and personal or institutional preference.
Do all cultures refer to ships as female?
No. While many Western and Mediterranean cultures do, others vary. In Russian, which retains strong grammatical gender, ships (*корабль*) are masculine. Japanese typically uses neutral terms. The practice is culturally specific, not universal.
Why are some ships named after men if they’re called “she”?
Ship names often honor historical figures, leaders, or places—many of whom are male. The name doesn’t conflict with the use of “she” as a pronoun, which reflects personification rather than literal identity. For example, HMS Nelson honors Admiral Nelson but is still referred to as “she” in service records.
Conclusion: Honoring Tradition While Moving Forward
The tradition of calling ships “she” is more than a quirk of language—it’s a testament to humanity’s need to connect with the tools that carry us across unknown waters. Rooted in linguistics, shaped by history, and sustained by emotion, this custom reflects how we赋予 meaning to objects that safeguard our lives.
As the maritime world evolves, so too will its language. But whether we say “she” or “it,” the respect remains. The waves don’t care about pronouns; they respond to skill, preparation, and care. And perhaps that’s the true lesson: behind every ship, there’s a crew that treats her—or it—not as a machine, but as a partner in the endless dance between humans and the sea.
浙公网安备
33010002000092号
浙B2-20120091-4
Comments
No comments yet. Why don't you start the discussion?