| Single-Faced Plastic Pallets (User’s Product) | Logistics, Storage, Transportation | Steel-reinforced plastic (EN 840), Dynamic Load 2.0t (▲1.5t industry avg), Static Load 2.0t (EN 12048) | Lightweight (15kg ▲20% lighter than wood), Recyclable (ISO 14021) | Lower stacking capacity vs double-faced (▲1.2m height limit) |
| Double-Faced Plastic Pallets | Heavy industrial storage, warehouses | Double-reinforced structure (EN 13414), Dynamic Load 3.0t (▲1.5t over single-faced), Static Load 4.0t | Higher stacking capacity (▲2.5m), Durable (ASTM D638) | Heavier (▲30% weight vs single-faced), Costlier (▲€50/unit) |
| Wooden Pallets | General cargo, short-term use | Treated wood (EN 335), Dynamic Load 1.2t (▲0.8t avg), Static Load 1.5t | Cost-effective (▲30% cheaper than plastic), Customizable | Prone to rot (▲50% shorter lifespan), Not eco-friendly (non-recyclable) |
| Metal Pallets (Steel) | Heavy machinery, corrosive environments | Steel construction (EN 13414), Dynamic Load 4.0t (▲2.0t over plastic), Static Load 5.0t | Extremely durable (ASTM A36), Corrosion-resistant (ISO 12944) | Heavy (▲50kg vs plastic), High cost (▲2× plastic) |
| Euro Pallets | Standardized European logistics | Dimensions 80×120cm (EN 13414), Dynamic Load 2.0t, Static Load 2.5t | Widely accepted (▲90% EU usage), Automated system compatibility | Limited customization (no color options), Higher cost (▲€20/unit) |
| Composite Pallets | High-end logistics requiring strength/lightweight | Hybrid plastic-wood design (ASTM D790), Dynamic Load 2.5t (▲1.3t over wood), Static Load 3.0t | Balanced cost (▲15% cheaper than metal), Recyclable (ISO 14020) | Mixed material recycling challenges (▲50% recovery rate), Less durable (▲10% lifespan vs plastic) |