Supplier's note
...
Wait, so the user's instruction has conflicting parts. In the Structured Requirements section, they specify the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format provided, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. The user might have intended the Technical Specifications section to follow the example format (Feature, Specification, Benefit), while the Technical Parameters Table (as a separate section?) is different. But looking at the final format given, the user's example includes a Technical Specifications table with Benefit.
Hmm, perhaps the user made a mistake in the Structured Requirements. Since the example format is more concrete, I'll follow that. The Technical Specifications table in the example has three columns: Feature, Specification, Benefit. So I'll proceed with that structure, even though the Structured Requirements mention Application Scenario. Maybe that was a typo or misalignment. Alternatively, perhaps the Technical Parameters Table is part of the Technical Specifications. To avoid confusion, I'll follow the example format provided by the user for the Technical Specifications section.
So, moving forward, the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit. The Scenario Solution Paragraph is a separate section, which can explain the application scenarios.
Now, compiling the Technical Specifications:
Features from the product attributes and vision details:
- Material: Body made of durable plastic/composite (Vision Detail)
- Propeller Material: Sturdy plastic/metal (Vision Detail)
- Thrust: 40Lbs (Product Attributes)
- Length: 360mm (Product Attributes)
- Power Source: 12V Rechargeable Battery (Vision Detail)
- Mounting: Adjustable vertical pole (Vision Detail)
- Control Options: Manual/Remote (Vision Detail)
- Application: Offshore Waters (Product Attributes)
Specifications would be the specific values. Benefits are the advantages.
For example:
Feature | Specification | Benefit |
---|
Material | Durable plastic/composite body | Lightweight and corrosion-resistant |
Propeller Material | Sturdy plastic/metal | Efficient thrust with minimal resistance |
Thrust | 40Lbs | Sufficient propulsion for small boats/canoes |
Length | 360mm | Compact design for easy storage |
Power Source | 12V Rechargeable Battery | Environmentally friendly and cost-effective |
Mounting | Adjustable vertical pole | Optimizes positioning for various boats/water conditions |
Control Options | Manual/Remote | Easy speed/direction adjustments |
Application | Offshore Waters | Safe and reliable operation in open water |
Wait, but the Application is more of a feature than a specification. Maybe rephrase. Alternatively, Application Scenario can be part of the Benefit column. For example, the benefit of offshore application is suitability for those conditions.
Next, the Customization Guide. The user wants hints like "Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs." From the vision details, adjustable mounting pole height and control options. So:
"Adjust the mounting pole height to accommodate different boat sizes or water depths. Choose between manual or remote control for precise navigation tailored to your boating style."
Scenario Solution Paragraph: "The medium thrust capacity of 40Lbs ensures stable propulsion in calm lakes, while the adjustable mounting allows optimal positioning for navigating shallow waters. For offshore use, the corrosion-resistant materials protect against saltwater exposure, extending the motor's lifespan."
Choose Your Model table: Need three models (Base, Advanced, Pro) with parameters. Let's think of key attributes like Thrust, Battery Life, Control Type, Mounting Adjustability, and maybe Materials.
Assume the Base Model has 40Lbs thrust, standard battery, manual control, basic mounting. Advanced adds 15% more thrust (46Lbs?), extended battery, remote control, adjustable mounting. Pro has 60Lbs (+50% from base?), premium battery, remote with GPS, fully adjustable mounting and premium materials.
Wait, but the original product is 40Lbs. Maybe the base is 40Lbs, advanced is +15% (46), pro +30% (52). But the user's example shows "+15%" and "+30%". Let me structure accordingly.
Parameter | Base Model | Advanced Model | Pro Model |
---|
Thrust (Lbs) | 40 | +15% (46Lbs) | +30% (52Lbs) |
Battery Life | 4 hours | 5 hours (+25%) | 6 hours (+50%) |
Control Type | Manual | Remote | Remote + GPS |
Mounting Adjustability | Fixed positions | Adjustable height | Fully adjustable angle/height |
Materials | Durable plastic | Reinforced composite | Marine-grade aluminum |
Wait, but the original product's material is plastic/composite. So maybe the Pro uses better materials. The Battery Life could be a key parameter. The example uses percentages over baseline.
Managers Note: First paragraph on three breakthroughs. Let's pick:
- Adjustable mounting pole allows optimal positioning (Feature: Mounting)
- 12V rechargeable battery offers eco-friendly power (Power Source)
- Corrosion-resistant materials for offshore durability (Material)
Second paragraph guiding selection:
- Base: Casual users needing basic thrust and manual control.
- Advanced: Frequent users requiring remote control and longer battery.
- Pro: Professional offshore users needing high thrust and premium features.
Use "With X, you can Y" structure in the Technical Specifications benefits. For example, "With an adjustable mounting pole, you can optimize thrust direction for varying water conditions."
Comparative hints like "25% longer battery life than competitors" if applicable, but since the input doesn't mention competitors, maybe just "+25% over Base".
Putting it all together in markdown as per the format.
</think>