15t Capacity Rice Maize Dryer Mobile Small Corn Grain Dryer with Steel Motor/Engine for Farms and Manufacturing Plants

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Ah, so the user's example format shows the Technical Specifications table with columns Feature, Specification, Benefit. But the instruction before that says the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. This is conflicting. Since the user provided the example format, I should follow that. So the Technical Specifications table will have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. The user might have made a mistake in the instruction, but the example is more important. So proceed with the example's format.

Now, proceeding to build each section:

Product Details: A brief overview. Mention the 15t capacity, mobile design, steel construction, suitable for farms and plants.

Technical Specifications Table: Features like Material (Carbon Steel), Capacity (15t), Power (3kW), Mobility (Wheeled Base), Drying Chamber Design (Cylindrical with Conical Bottom), Loading System (Hopper), Discharge System (Chute), Color (Yellow/Green), Motor Type (Steel Motor/Engine). Each with their specs and benefits.

Customization Guide: Adjustable drying temperature and time settings to accommodate different grain types and moisture levels. Maybe mention customization options like adding filters or adjusting the drying chamber size.

Get Inspiration: A paragraph encouraging customers to choose this dryer for efficient processing, reducing waste, etc.

Choose Your Model Table: Since the input only has one model's specs (15t, 3kW), I need to invent Base, Advanced, Pro models. Let's assume:

• Base Model: 10t capacity, 2.5kW power, basic mobility (maybe fixed base?), standard features.

• Advanced: 15t, 3kW (as given), wheeled, adjustable settings.

• Pro: 20t, 4kW, advanced features like automated controls, higher efficiency.

Comparing against industry benchmarks, maybe the Base is standard, Advanced is +15% capacity over industry average, Pro is +30%.

Managers Note: Three technical breakthroughs could be the steel construction for durability, mobile design for flexibility, and adjustable settings for customization. Then guide users: small farms might choose Base, medium Advanced, large Pro. Use "With X, you can Y" structure, e.g., "With the Pro model's 20t capacity, you can process larger harvests efficiently."

Need to ensure all parts are covered and follow the structure strictly. Also, include comparative hints where possible, like "20% faster drying time than traditional models" if applicable, but since the input doesn't mention speed, maybe not. Alternatively, the Pro model's higher power allows faster drying.

Alright, putting it all together now. </think>