Supplier's note
...
Wait, in the format example, the Technical Specifications table has Benefit, but the instruction says Technical Parameters Table should have Application Scenario. This is conflicting. Since the user provided the format example, perhaps they intended the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Therefore, I'll follow the example's structure for the Technical Specifications table (Feature, Specification, Benefit), and the other tables as per instructions.
Now, proceeding:
Product Details: Start with a concise intro. Mention portability, power options, certifications, materials (wood, glass, etc.), and key features like handheld and deep marking.
Technical Specifications Table: Features like Laser Power, Cooling Mode, Laser Source Type, etc. For each, the specification and benefit. Use "With X, you can Y" structure for benefits. For example:
Feature: Laser Power | Specification: 3W/5W/10W UV Fiber Laser | Benefit: With adjustable power settings, achieve precise engravings on wood, glass, and plastics.
Wait, but the input says laser source includes UV and fiber. The laser type is UV laser and fiber laser. Wait, the product attributes list "laser type:uv laser,fiber laser". So maybe the machine can switch between UV and fiber? Or it's a UV fiber laser? Need to clarify. The image mentions UV laser engraving machine. The product attributes list "laser source:uv,fiber", so perhaps it can use either? Or it's a UV laser (which is a type of fiber laser?). Maybe the laser source brand includes UV and fiber options. Hmm, perhaps the laser type is UV laser, and the source brands are listed. Maybe the technical specs should mention the laser type as UV Fiber Laser with brands like JPT, Max, etc.
Another feature: Material Compatibility. Specification: Wood, Glass, Plastics, Metals. Benefit: With versatile material compatibility, create detailed engravings on a wide range of surfaces.
Cooling Mode: Air Cooling. Benefit: Efficient heat dissipation ensures continuous operation without overheating.
Certifications: CE, EPR Germany/France. Benefit: Meets stringent safety and environmental standards for global compliance.
Control Panel: User-Friendly Interface. Specification: Adjustable settings via touch panel. Benefit: With intuitive controls, easily adjust laser power, speed, and focus for optimal results.
Customization Guide: The user wants adjustable parameters. The product has adjustable laser power (3W-10W), focus, and can handle different materials. So the customization hint could be: "Adjustable laser power (3W-10W) and focus settings to customize engraving depth and precision for specific material needs."
Get Inspiration: A paragraph inspiring customers by mentioning applications like jewelry, electronics, medical devices, and how the machine's precision and portability make it suitable for these industries.
Choose Your Model Table: The three models are 3W (Base), 5W (Advanced), 10W (Pro). The parameters could be Laser Power, Precision Level, Material Thickness, and maybe Speed. Let's structure it:
Parameter | Base Model (3W) | Advanced Model (5W) | Pro Model (10W) |
---|
Laser Power | 3W | +66% (5W) | +233% (10W) |
Precision | Standard | Enhanced (+20%) | Premium (+40%) |
Material Thickness | 3mm | 5mm (+66%) | 10mm (+233%) |
Speed | 500mm/s | 650mm/s (+30%) | 800mm/s (+60%) |
Wait, but the user's example uses "+15%", "+30%", so maybe better to use percentage increases from the base. For example, 3W to 5W is +66%, but that's a big jump. Alternatively, maybe the parameters are different. Let me think of key attributes like laser power, precision, material compatibility, and speed. The Pro model's 10W is double the Advanced's 5W, so maybe "Double the power of Advanced" or "+100%".
Alternatively, use the example's structure where the first column is the baseline, and the others are percentage increases. For example:
Parameter | Base Model | Advanced Model | Pro Model |
---|
Laser Power | 3W | +66% (5W) | +233% (10W) |
Precision | Standard | +20% | +40% |
Processing Speed | 500mm/s | +30% (650mm/s) | +60% (800mm/s) |
But the user's example uses "[Baseline Value]" and then "+15%", so maybe better to write the base value and then the increase as a percentage. For instance:
Parameter | Base Model | Advanced Model | Pro Model |
---|
Laser Power | 3W | +66% (5W) | +233% (10W) |
Precision | 0.01mm | +20% (0.008mm) | +40% (0.006mm) |
Max Material Thickness | 3mm | +66% (5mm) | +233% (10mm) |
But I need to ensure that the parameters are realistic. Alternatively, maybe use "Max Engraving Speed" as a parameter where the Pro is 2x faster than Base. The user's example had "20% faster than traditional models" as a comparative hint, so perhaps include that.
Manager's Note: First paragraph: three technical breakthroughs. The certifications (EPR, CE), the handheld feature for portability, and deep marking capability. Second paragraph: Guide users. For example, the Pro is for industrial use needing high power and speed, Advanced for medium tasks, Base for hobbyists or small businesses.
Need to ensure all elements are covered and the structure is followed. Also, check for the "With X, you can Y" structure in benefits. Let me draft each section now.
</think>