Material Composition | High-stress engine parts, lightweight applications | - Industry Standard: Steel (500 MPa tensile strength, ASTM E8/E9) - Our Base: Iron (420 MPa) - Our Advanced: Aluminum Alloy (280 MPa) | - Our Advanced: 280g/unit (▲44% lighter than steel) - Our Base: Cost-effective durability | - Industry Standard: Heavy, prone to corrosion - Our Advanced: Lower tensile strength (▼44% vs steel) |
Weight | Racing, reduced engine inertia | - Industry Standard: 500g/unit (steel) - Our Base: 450g/unit (▲10% lighter) - Our Advanced: 280g/unit (▲44% lighter) | - Our Advanced: Reduces rotational inertia by 44% - Our Base: Moderate weight savings | - Industry Standard: Increases engine load - Our Advanced: Higher cost due to aluminum alloy |
Corrosion Resistance | Coastal/marine environments | - Industry Standard: Steel (ASTM B117 200hr salt spray) - Our Base: Iron (ASTM B117 100hr) - Our Advanced: Aluminum (ASTM B117 500hr) | - Our Advanced: 2.5× longer corrosion resistance (▲150% vs steel) | - Our Base: Requires coating for rust prevention - Industry Standard: Needs frequent maintenance |
Noise Level | Urban commuting | - Industry Standard: 55 dBA (steel) - Our Base: 50 dBA (▲9% quieter) - Our Advanced: 45 dBA (▲18% quieter) | - Our Advanced: Quieter than a refrigerator hum (43 dBA) - Our Base: Reduced engine noise interference | - Industry Standard: Audible at close range (e.g., passenger discomfort) |
Cost Efficiency | Budget-friendly upgrades | - Industry Standard: $20/unit - Our Base: $15/unit (▲25% cheaper) - Our Advanced: $30/unit | - Our Base: Economical for moderate budgets - Industry Standard: Widely available | - Our Advanced: 50% higher cost - Industry Standard: Lower durability vs aluminum |
Thermal Conductivity | High-performance engines | - Industry Standard: 50 W/m·K (steel) - Our Base: 80 W/m·K (▲60%) - Our Advanced: 200 W/m·K (▲300%) | - Our Advanced: 4× better heat dissipation - Our Base: Improved cooling efficiency | - Industry Standard: Poor heat transfer (risk of overheating) |