Industry Standard Radiator | General passenger vehicles, daily driving | Copper/brass core, thermal efficiency 85% (ASTM C518), weight 12kg, corrosion resistance ASTM B117 500hrs | Cost-effective, widely compatible with OEM systems | Heavier, lower cooling efficiency for high-performance applications |
Our Base Model | Performance vehicles (e.g., MB100/MB140) | Aluminum core + plastic tanks (ISO 529), thermal efficiency 92% (▲8% over Industry), weight 9kg (▲3kg lighter) | Lightweight, superior cooling for performance engines, durable construction | Higher cost than OEM, requires some customization for installation |
Our Advanced Model | Professional racing, extreme conditions | Aluminum + copper fins, thermal efficiency 95% (▲3% over Base), weight 8kg (▲1kg lighter), pressure resistance 350kPa (▲100kPa) | Optimal cooling for high-stress racing, ultra-lightweight, withstands extreme pressure | Most expensive, specialized installation required for optimal performance |
Aluminum Radiator | High-performance applications | Pure aluminum core, thermal efficiency 90%, weight 10kg (ISO 529) | Excellent heat dissipation, lightweight compared to copper/brass | Prone to corrosion without protective coatings, costlier than plastic variants |
Plastic Radiator | Budget vehicles, low-intensity use | Plastic core, thermal efficiency 75%, weight 11kg (ISO 529) | Low cost, corrosion-resistant, easy to manufacture | Poor cooling capacity, heavier than aluminum, unsuitable for high-performance |
Composite Radiator | Hybrid vehicles, moderate performance | Aluminum-plastic hybrid, thermal efficiency 88%, weight 10.5kg (ISO 529) | Balanced performance/cost ratio, moderate durability | Compromised cooling efficiency compared to pure aluminum, limited in extreme use |