Automatic Double Color Chocolate Filled Cookies Ice Box Cookies Making Machine for Sale

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Ah, so in the structured requirements, the Technical Parameters Table is supposed to have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format provided by the user, they have Feature, Specification, Benefit. There's a conflict here. Since the user's example shows Benefit, but the structured requirement says Application Scenario, perhaps I should follow the structured requirement's columns. But the example might be a mistake. Alternatively, maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have those three columns as per the structured requirement. Let me check the user's instruction again.

The user says:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)"

So the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. Hmm, perhaps the user made a mistake in the example, but the structured requirement is clear. So I should follow the structured requirement's columns. But the example might have been a different case. Alternatively, maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications to be the same as the Technical Parameters Table. Maybe the example is for a different product. Since the user's instruction says to follow the structured requirements, I'll proceed with the columns as per the structured requirement: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.

Wait, but the example's Technical Specifications table has Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Maybe the user mixed up the terms. Let me think again. The user's instruction says:

"Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)"

Therefore, the table should have those three columns. So I need to adjust accordingly. For example:

Feature: Material, Specification: Stainless Steel, Application Scenario: Commercial bakeries requiring hygienic and durable equipment.

But in the example, they have Benefit. Maybe the user intended Application Scenario to be the benefit or the use case. Let me proceed as per the instruction.

Now, moving on. The Technical Parameters Table will have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.

Features would be Material, Voltage, Certification, Automation, Conveyor Belt System, Customization Options.

Specifications are the given attributes plus the image details. For example, Material: Stainless Steel, Voltage: 220V, Certification: EPR France Packing, Automation: Digital Control Panel with precise settings, Conveyor Belt: Continuous production, Customization: Adjustable parameters via control panel.

Application Scenario for each feature: For Material, it's commercial environments needing durability and hygiene. Voltage: For regions using 220V. Certification: For EU markets. Automation: For consistent production. Conveyor Belt: High-volume production. Customization: For varied recipes.

Customization Guide: Adjustable parameters like temperature (range?), conveyor speed, filling thickness, and cookie size. These can be adjusted to meet specific product needs.

Get Inspiration: Maybe start with "Elevate your cookie production with our..." and mention the key features.

Choose Your Model Table: The key attributes could be Production Capacity (kg/h), Temperature Control Precision (±°C), Filling Accuracy (g), and maybe Customization Options. The Base Model might have lower specs, Advanced adds 15% capacity, Pro 30%. Or similar. Comparative hints like 20% faster than industry benchmarks.

Managers Note: Three technical breakthroughs could be the dual-color filling capability, precise temperature control, and stainless steel construction. Then guide users: small bakeries might choose Base, medium Advanced, large Pro.

Now, putting it all together in the required format, ensuring the "With X, you can Y" structure and comparative hints where applicable. Also, check that all product attributes are included and image details are reflected.

Wait, the product attributes include certification:EPR_France_Packing. So that's EPR certification in France, which is important for European compliance. Need to mention that in the specifications.

Also, the voltage is 220V, so regions using that voltage would be applicable.

Material is steel and stainless steel. The image says stainless steel is the main material, so maybe the primary material is stainless steel, with some steel components? Or perhaps the product is made of stainless steel. The input says material:steel,stainless steel, so both are used. Need to clarify that in the specifications.

Alright, time to structure the markdown accordingly. </think>