Automatic Manufacture of All Types of Plastic Pipes Black Flexible Corrugated Split Tubing Convoluted Wire Loom Open Conduit

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, the user's example format shows the Technical Specifications table with Benefit, but in the structured requirements, they mentioned Technical Parameters Table with Application Scenario. This is conflicting. Since the user provided both, perhaps the Technical Specifications table in the format is the same as the Technical Parameters Table, but with different columns. Maybe the user made an error, but since the example is part of the required format, I should follow the example's columns (Feature, Specification, Benefit) for the Technical Specifications section. The structured requirements mention Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, but the example uses Benefit. This is confusing.

Alternatively, perhaps the user intended that the Technical Specifications table should have the three columns from the structured requirements. To resolve this, I'll proceed with the structured requirements' columns (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) for the Technical Specifications section. Because the user explicitly stated that in the structured requirements, even if the example shows Benefit. Maybe the example was a mistake.

Alternatively, maybe the user wants two separate tables. But given the confusion, perhaps the best approach is to follow the example's format since it's the final instruction. Let me check the user's instruction again:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

The user's structured requirements specify the Technical Parameters Table with those three columns. The example format shows a Technical Specifications table with Benefit. Since the user's instruction is more specific, I'll follow the structured requirements. Therefore, the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.

Proceeding with that, let's outline the Technical Specifications table:

Features from the product attributes and vision details:

• Material: Plastic/Nylon (from Product Attributes)
• High Flexibility (Feature)
• Certification: UL, RoHS (from Product Attributes)
• Corrugated Design (from Vision Detail)
• Split Tubing (from Title)
• Open Conduit (from Title)
• Electrical Wire Protection (Application from Product Attributes)

So the table would look like:

Wait, but the application scenario should be the use case. For example, the high flexibility is used in scenarios where routing is needed. The certification applies to electrical systems needing compliance.

Next, the Customization Guide: Adjustable parameters like size, length, material. So the hint could be: "Adjustable length and material composition to meet specific durability or temperature requirements."

Scenario Solution Paragraph: "The corrugated design's medium thickness is suitable for automotive wiring, providing protection without adding bulk. The high flexibility allows it to be routed through tight engine compartments, ensuring ease of installation."

Choose Your Model table. The three versions (Base, Advanced, Pro). Key attributes could be flexibility, temperature range, chemical resistance, durability.

Assume the key attributes from the product's features. Let's say:

• Flexibility
• Temperature Resistance
• Chemical Resistance
• Durability

Base Model has standard specs. Advanced adds 15% more flexibility, higher temp. Pro adds 30% flexibility, even higher temp, and chemical resistance beyond industry.

Example table:

Managers Note:

First paragraph: Highlight three breakthroughs. Maybe corrugated design for flexibility, UL/RoHS certification for safety, and material blend for durability.

Second paragraph: Guide selection. Base for standard electrical use, Advanced for industrial with wider temps, Pro for harsh chemical environments.

Now, putting it all together in markdown, following the example's format but with the columns as per instructions. Wait, but the example's Technical Specifications table uses Benefit. Hmm, maybe I need to reconcile.

Alternatively, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have the three columns from the structured requirements (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). So proceed with that.

Final check: Use "With X, you can Y" structure where possible. For example, "With UL/RoHS certification, you can ensure compliance in regulated industries."

Comparative hints: "20% more flexible than traditional conduits" if applicable.

Alright, time to structure all this into the markdown format as per the user's example. </think>