Supplier's note
...
Wait, the user's format example shows Technical Specifications with columns Feature, Specification, Benefit, but the structured requirements mention Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. There's a discrepancy here. Since the user provided the format example with Benefit, I should follow that. Maybe the structured requirements were a general guideline, but the format example takes precedence. Let me confirm:
The user says in the instruction:
"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:
Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...)
Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...)
Structured Requirements:
Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)"
Hmm, so maybe the Technical Specifications table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But the format example shows Benefit. This is conflicting. Since the user provided the format example with Benefit, perhaps they want that. Alternatively, maybe the structured requirements are part of the instructions. Since the user might have conflicting info, perhaps I should follow the format example given at the end, which uses Benefit. Alternatively, maybe the Technical Parameters Table is separate from the Technical Specifications. Wait, the user's instruction says:
"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:
Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...)
Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...)
Structured Requirements:
Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)
Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs)
Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...)
(Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given)
Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."
So the Technical Parameters Table is part of the structured requirements, which should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But the format example shows Technical Specifications with Benefit. This is conflicting. Since the user provided both, perhaps the Technical Specifications in the format example is the same as the Technical Parameters Table. Maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. Alternatively, maybe the user made a mistake. To resolve this, perhaps I should follow the structured requirements for the Technical Parameters Table (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario), but the format example shows Benefit. Since the user's final format example uses Benefit, perhaps they prefer that. Alternatively, maybe the user wants two tables? Not sure. Since the user's instruction says "Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text" and the structured requirements mention Technical Parameters Table with those columns, I'll proceed with that.
Alternatively, perhaps the user's format example is the correct structure. Let me check the exact instruction again:
The user says:
"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:
Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...)
Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...)
Structured Requirements:
Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)
Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs)
Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...)
(Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given)
Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure:
Parameter | Base Model | Advanced Model | Pro Model |
---|
[Key Attribute 1] | [Baseline Value] | [+15%] | [+30%]* |
[Key Attribute 2] | [Base Spec] | [Enhanced] | [Premium] |
Managers Note | | | |
(Write 2 short narrative paragraphs that: | | | |
- If applicable, explain three most significant technical breakthroughs using [Feature] attributes
- Guide users to optimal version selection based on [Applicable Crowd] data
Example: The Pro version's chemical resistance rating – triple the industry standard – enables safe handling of...[specific scenarios from table]. When paired with its...[material property], this creates...[user benefit]."
)
Requirements:
Use the "With X, you can Y" sentence structure (Example: With chemical-resistant viscose fabric, ensure durability in harsh environments)
[Only when reasonable and consistent] Include comparative hints (Example: 20% faster than traditional models)
FORMAT