Building Materials Additive Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose HPMC in Wall Putty

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, in the user's example format, the Technical Specifications table has three columns: Feature, Specification, Benefit. But in the structured requirements above that, the user says Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. There's a conflict here. Which one should I follow?

Looking at the user's instruction, the first part says to create a Technical Parameters Table with those three columns, but the example format shows a Technical Specifications table with Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Since the example format is given as the required output structure, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have Feature, Specification, Benefit, and the Technical Parameters Table (from structured requirements) might be a different part. Wait, maybe I misread. Let me check again.

The user's instruction says:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the user wants a Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format provided, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. This is conflicting. Since the user's structured requirements explicitly mention the columns for the Technical Parameters Table, perhaps the example format's Technical Specifications is a different table. Wait, the user might have made a mistake in the example. Alternatively, perhaps the Technical Specifications in the example is the same as the Technical Parameters Table. To resolve this, I'll follow the structured requirements: the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. However, in the example format, the Technical Specifications table has Benefit. Maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications to be the same as the Technical Parameters Table. Alternatively, perhaps the user wants two separate tables. But given the confusion, perhaps I should proceed with the structured requirements' columns. Let me check the user's exact instruction again.

The user says:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

Therefore, the Technical Parameters Table must have the three columns as specified. However, in the example format provided by the user, the Technical Specifications table has three columns: Feature, Specification, Benefit. This is conflicting. Since the user's structured requirements explicitly mention the columns for the Technical Parameters Table, I should follow that. But the example format's Technical Specifications might be a different table. Alternatively, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications to be the same as the Technical Parameters Table but with a different name. To resolve this, perhaps the user made a mistake, and the example's Technical Specifications is the same as the Technical Parameters Table. Therefore, I'll proceed with the columns as per the structured requirements: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.

Wait, but the example's Technical Specifications table has Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Hmm. Alternatively, maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications to have those three columns, but the structured requirements mention Technical Parameters Table. Maybe the user wants two tables: one Technical Specifications and another Technical Parameters. But that's unclear. Since the user's example format includes a Technical Specifications table with Benefit, perhaps they want that, and the structured requirements' mention of Technical Parameters Table is part of the same. Maybe the user made a mistake in the structured requirements. To avoid confusion, perhaps I should follow the example format's structure, which is the required output format. The example's Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. So I'll go with that, even though the structured requirements mention Application Scenario. Maybe it's a typo. Alternatively, perhaps the user intended the Technical Parameters Table to be part of the Technical Specifications. To resolve, I'll proceed with the example's structure since that's the required output format.

So, the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit. The Scenario Solution Paragraph is a separate section, which is the "Get Inspiration" part.

Now, moving to the product attributes:

Title: Building Materials Additive Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose HPMC in Wall Putty

Category: Adhesives & Sealants

Product Attributes: application: paint, construction; feature: high viscosity; material: cotton; odor: high; solvent: water; type: binder.

Vision details: The image shows a white powder in an orange, semi-transparent dish with glossy finish. The material is durable and transparent, glossy finish for easy cleaning, semi-transparent for visibility, curved shape to prevent spillage, customizable material and design, versatile for various industries.

Wait, but the product itself is the HPMC additive. The vision details describe the container, but the product's attributes are about the HPMC. So the material (cotton) refers to the HPMC's source, perhaps? HPMC is derived from cellulose, which comes from cotton. So the material here is cotton-based.

The Technical Specifications table should include features like Material (cotton-based), Viscosity (high), Solvent (water-based), Odor (high), Application (paint, construction), Type (binder). Each with their specifications and benefits.

For example:

Feature: Material | Specification: Cotton-based | Benefit: Sustainable and biodegradable source.

Feature: Viscosity | Specification: High | Benefit: Enhances adhesion and film-forming properties.

Feature: Solvent | Specification: Water-based | Benefit: Eco-friendly and easy to clean up.

Feature: Odor | Specification: High | Benefit: May require ventilation during application.

Wait, but high odor could be a downside. Maybe the benefit is that it's easily detectable, but perhaps the user wants to frame it positively. Alternatively, maybe it's a drawback, so the benefit might be that it's a natural byproduct, but the customization guide can suggest reducing odor.

Application Scenario would be part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph or the Technical Parameters Table. Since the user's structured requirements mention Application Scenario as a column in the Technical Parameters Table, but in the example format, it's not there. Hmm, this is conflicting again. Since the example format's Technical Specifications table uses Benefit, perhaps the user intended that. I'll proceed with the example's structure.

Next, the Choose Your Model table. The key attributes would be viscosity, odor, and maybe application versatility. The base model has standard specs, advanced has higher viscosity, pro has even higher and lower odor. For example:

Parameter | Base Model | Advanced Model | Pro Model Viscosity | 1000 cps | +15% (1150 cps) | +30% (1300 cps) Odor | High | Moderate | Low Application Versatility | Paint | Paint & Light Construction | All Construction Uses

Managers Note needs two paragraphs. The first highlights three technical breakthroughs: high viscosity, water-based solvent, cotton material. The second guides users: Pro model for low odor in indoor work, Advanced for higher viscosity in heavy-duty, Base for standard needs.

Now, putting it all together in markdown as per the example format. Ensure "With X, you can Y" structure in descriptions. For example, "With high viscosity, you can achieve uniform coating distribution..." Also, include comparative hints where possible, like "20% faster drying time than traditional additives".

Wait, the product's attributes don't mention drying time, so maybe not. Alternatively, the solvent being water-based can be compared to solvent-based alternatives as eco-friendly.

Also, the vision details mention the container's features, but since the product is the HPMC, maybe the glossy finish and durability of the container is part of the packaging, but the user's input doesn't mention that. The product attributes don't include packaging details, so perhaps focus on the HPMC's specs.

Customization Guide: Adjustable viscosity levels to meet specific coating needs, odor reduction for sensitive environments, and solvent compatibility adjustments.

Scenario Solution Paragraph (Get Inspiration): "Ideal for construction and paint applications, our HPMC additive ensures durable, smooth finishes. Its high viscosity maintains structural integrity in wall putty, while water-based formulation simplifies cleanup. The cotton-derived material offers eco-conscious benefits for sustainable building projects."

Managers Note: First paragraph highlights high viscosity enabling thicker coatings, water-based reducing environmental impact, and cotton source for biodegradability. Second paragraph guides users to Pro for low odor in indoor work, Advanced for heavy-duty, Base for standard applications.

I think that covers all sections. Now, structure it in markdown as per the example. </think>