Supplier's note
...
Ah, here in the format example, the Technical Specifications table has Benefit as the third column. But the structured requirements above said Application Scenario. There's a conflict here. The user might have conflicting instructions. Since the format example is the one to follow for the output, I should prioritize that. The user might have made a mistake in the structured requirements. So the Technical Specifications table should have Feature, Specification, Benefit.
Therefore, I'll proceed with the columns as per the example format: Feature, Specification, Benefit.
Now, moving on. Let me start drafting each section.
Product Details: Start with the title, mention CE compliance, materials, adjustability, and application in meat processing.
Technical Specifications Table:
Features could be:
- Material: Stainless Steel Frame & Belt
- Speed: Adjustable (0-1.2 m/s)
- Compliance: CE Certified
- Load Capacity: Up to 1000 kg/m²
- Automation: Manual/Programmable Controls
Specifications and Benefits accordingly.
Customization Guide: Mention adjustable speed and possibly belt length/width to suit production needs.
Get Inspiration: Highlight efficiency, hygiene, and adaptability in meat processing.
Choose Your Model Table: Three models with parameters like Speed Range, Load Capacity, Automation Level, and Compliance. Base might have lower specs, Pro higher.
Manager's Note: First paragraph on breakthroughs (CE, material, speed). Second on choosing based on needs (small vs large plants, automation required).
Also, ensure using "With X, you can Y" structure. For example, "With CE certification, you can ensure compliance..." and "With stainless steel construction, you can maintain hygiene..."
Comparative hints: Maybe in the Choose Your Model table, the Pro model has 50% higher speed than Base, etc.
Now, putting it all together in markdown as per the format.
</think>