Supplier's note
...
Ah, so the Technical Specifications table in the format example has Feature, Specification, Benefit. But the structured requirements mention Technical Parameters Table with Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. There's a conflict here. The user might have made a mistake, but since the example format shows Benefit instead of Application Scenario, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit. To resolve this, I'll follow the example's format, using Feature, Specification, Benefit.
Now, proceeding with that in mind.
Technical Specifications Table:
Features from product attributes and vision details:
- Material: Steel (from product attributes)
- Type: Bushing (product attribute)
- Warranty: 6 months
- Modular Design (vision detail)
- Segmented Friction Material (vision detail)
- Reinforced Edges (vision detail)
- Spring Distribution (vision detail)
- Customizable Components (vision detail)
Each of these can be features. The specifications would be their details, and benefits explain why that's good.
For example:
Feature: Material Composition
Specification: High-grade steel
Benefit: Ensures durability under high pressure and temperature.
Feature: Modular Design
Specification: Interchangeable components
Benefit: Easy assembly/disassembly for maintenance.
Customization Guide: Adjustable friction material types and spring tension for specific torque requirements.
Get Inspiration: Highlight the product's ability to handle heavy-duty tasks, customization, and reliability.
Choose Your Model Table: Need to create three models. Let's think of parameters like Material, Load Capacity, Temperature Resistance, Customization Options, Warranty.
Base Model: Steel, standard load, up to 150°C, basic customization, 6 months warranty.
Advanced: Premium steel with coating, 20% higher load, 180°C, more customization options, 12 months.
Pro: Ceramic composite, 30% higher load, 200°C, full customization, 24 months.
Managers Note: First paragraph highlights modular design, segmented friction for heat, reinforced edges for vibration. Second paragraph guides users: For basic needs, Base; frequent use, Advanced; extreme conditions, Pro.
Also, ensure "With X, you can Y" sentences. For example, "With the modular design, you can easily replace components during maintenance."
Comparative hints like "20% lighter than traditional models" if applicable. Since the product is "Cheap Customized Small Manufacturing", maybe the Base is cost-effective, while Pro offers premium features.
I need to make sure all the product attributes and vision details are covered. The title mentions compatibility with specific tractor models (1054, 1354, etc.), so that should be in the product details.
Alright, putting it all together in the required markdown format now.
</think>