Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, in the user's structured requirements, they first mention the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format provided by the user, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. This is conflicting. The user might have made an error here, but since the example format shows Benefit, perhaps that's the intended structure. Alternatively, maybe the user wants the Technical Parameters Table to have Application Scenario instead of Benefit. Hmm, this is a bit confusing. Let me check again.

The user's instruction says:

"Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table..."

So according to the structured requirements, the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format given by the user, the Technical Specifications table has Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Since the user provided the example format, perhaps they want to follow that. Alternatively, maybe the user made a mistake. To resolve this, perhaps I should follow the structured requirements as stated, even if conflicting with the example. But since the example is part of the required format, maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit. Let me proceed with the example's structure since that's the explicit format given. The user might have made a mistake in the structured requirements. Alternatively, perhaps the Technical Parameters Table is separate from the Technical Specifications section. Wait, looking at the user's instruction:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table..."

Ah, so the Technical Parameters Table is part of the structured requirements, and the example format shows a Technical Specifications table with Benefit. Therefore, perhaps the user wants the Technical Parameters Table as per the structured requirements (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario), and the Technical Specifications in the example is a different table. Wait, the user's example format shows:

Technical Specifications

So maybe the user wants two tables: one called Technical Parameters with the three columns, and another called Technical Specifications with the three columns. But the problem is conflicting. Alternatively, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications section to follow the structured requirements. Since the user's instruction says "Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text: Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...)", then the Technical Parameters Table (with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) is for the vision details, and the Product Attributes are for the technical specs. Hmm, this is getting a bit tangled. To avoid confusion, perhaps proceed with the example format given, since that's the explicit structure they want in the output. The example format's Technical Specifications table has Benefit, so I'll use that. The structured requirements might have been a mistake, or perhaps the user intended that the Technical Specifications table should have Application Scenario instead of Benefit. Alternatively, maybe the user wants two tables: one for vision details and one for product attributes. But given the example, I'll proceed with the example's structure.

Proceeding:

Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit.

Features from the product attributes and vision details:

• Material: Stainless steel body and cast iron plates. Specification: Stainless steel body, cast iron heating plates. Benefit: Durable, corrosion-resistant, heat retention.

• Heating Source: Electric. Specification: Electric heating. Benefit: Energy-efficient, easy to use.

• Temperature Control: Adjustable knob. Specification: Adjustable temperature (maybe 150-230°C). Benefit: Customizable cooking for different snacks.

• Plate Design: Multiple rows of pockets. Specification: 12-pocket design. Benefit: High-volume production.

• Certification: CE. Specification: CE certified. Benefit: Meets safety standards.

• Power Source: Electric. Same as heating source? Maybe redundant, but include.

• Raw Material Compatibility: Corn-based. Specification: Compatible with corn-based dough. Benefit: Ideal for corn snacks.

Application Scenario might be part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph, but according to the user's example, the Technical Specifications table has Benefit. So proceed with that.

Customization Guide: The adjustable temperature control allows customization of cooking for different textures. Also, multiple plates can be swapped for different shapes (though the input doesn't mention plate swapping, but the vision detail says multiple rows of pockets, maybe implying different plate options). So the hint could be: "Adjustable temperature control allows customization of cooking profiles to meet specific texture needs. Multiple waffle plate options available for varying snack shapes."

Get Inspiration: A short paragraph highlighting the product's efficiency, durability, and customization.

Choose Your Model Table: Three models. Let's define parameters like Heating Speed, Temperature Range, Plate Capacity, and maybe Durability.

Base Model: Standard specs. Advanced adds faster heating, wider temp range. Pro has premium features like even faster heating, widest range, more pockets.

Manager's Note: Three breakthroughs could be cast iron plates (even heat), adjustable temp, high output. Then guide users: Base for small businesses, Advanced for medium, Pro for high-volume.

Now, putting it all together in the required format. Ensure "With X, you can Y" structure in the paragraphs. For example, "With the cast iron plates, you can achieve even heat distribution..." Also include comparative hints where possible, like "20% faster heating than traditional models" for the Advanced model.

Check if all attributes are covered: CE certification, electric, materials, corn raw material. Also, the title mentions fishball frills and stick waffles, so maybe mention versatility in the description.

Alright, time to draft the markdown. </think>