Commercial Peanut Butter Cocoa Butter Maker Colloid Mill Tahini Grinder Cocoa Bean Grinder Mill Machine

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, the user's example format shows Technical Specifications with Benefit, but the structured requirements mention Technical Parameters Table with Application Scenario. This is conflicting. The user might have intended the Technical Specifications table to follow the example format (Feature, Specification, Benefit), while the Technical Parameters Table is a different table? Or maybe it's a mistake. Since the example format is provided, perhaps I should follow that, but the user's instruction says to use the structured requirements. Hmm, this is a bit confusing. Let me check again.

Looking at the user's instruction:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

The user's example format shows Technical Specifications with Benefit, but the structured requirements specify Technical Parameters Table with Application Scenario. Since the user provided the example format, perhaps the Technical Specifications in the example is the Technical Parameters Table. So perhaps the columns should be Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example, it's Feature, Specification, Benefit. Maybe the user made a mistake here. To resolve this, perhaps I should follow the structured requirements, which explicitly state the columns for Technical Parameters Table. So the Technical Specifications section in the example is actually the Technical Parameters Table with the three columns. Therefore, I need to make sure that the Technical Specifications table uses Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.

Alternatively, maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications to have Benefit, and the Technical Parameters Table is a different table. But since the example format includes Technical Specifications, perhaps the user wants that to be the Technical Parameters Table. This is a bit ambiguous, but I'll proceed with the structured requirements.

So, Technical Parameters Table (columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). Let's proceed accordingly.

Now, the product attributes include CE certification, so that's a feature with specification CE, and application scenario compliance with EU standards for commercial kitchens.

Vision details mention stainless steel, so material is stainless steel, specification maybe 304 grade, application scenario hygienic food processing.

Processing capacity from the functionality: maybe 100-200 kg/h, application scenario commercial production.

Adjustable gap settings for customization, specification adjustable between X and Y mm, application scenario varying texture needs.

Motor power, say 2HP, application scenario high-speed grinding.

Dimensions, maybe 80x60x120 cm, application scenario space-efficient setup.

Safety features like guards, application scenario user safety in commercial environments.

Now, for the Customization Guide: Adjustable gap parameters to customize texture for different nut butters and cocoa products.

Scenario Solution Paragraph: For example, medium gap setting suitable for smooth peanut butter, while a wider gap for chunky texture.

Choose Your Model table: Parameters like Processing Capacity, Motor Power, Automation Level. Base Model might have 100 kg/h, 2HP, manual controls. Advanced could be 115 kg/h, 2.5HP, semi-automatic. Pro 130 kg/h, 3HP, fully automatic. Comparing to industry benchmarks, maybe industry standard is 90 kg/h, so Base is +11%, etc.

Managers Note: Technical breakthroughs could be CE certification ensuring safety, stainless steel for hygiene, adjustable gap for versatility. Then guide users: Base for small businesses needing basic capacity, Advanced for medium with higher output, Pro for large-scale with automation.

Use "With X, you can Y" structure: "With CE certification, you can ensure compliance with EU standards for commercial kitchens." "With stainless steel construction, you can maintain hygiene in food processing."

Comparative hints: "30% faster processing than traditional models" if applicable, but need to check if the specs support that.

Putting it all together now. Need to structure the markdown as per the example format, but using the correct columns for the Technical Specifications table (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). Wait, the example format shows Benefit, but according to structured requirements, it should be Application Scenario. Let me confirm once more.

The user's instruction says:

"Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)"

Therefore, the Technical Specifications section should be the Technical Parameters Table with those three columns. So adjust accordingly.

Alright, proceeding with that. </think>