Supplier's note
...
Ah, so the user's instruction says the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Spec, Application Scenario, but in the example format, the Technical Specifications section has Feature, Spec, Benefit. Therefore, there's a contradiction. Since the example format is the one to follow, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. But the instruction says to use Application Scenario. This is confusing. To resolve, perhaps the user made a mistake, and the example format is correct. Since the example is part of the required format, I should follow that. So the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit. The Application Scenario might be part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph instead.
Alternatively, maybe the Technical Parameters Table is separate from the Technical Specifications section. Let me re-read the instructions carefully.
The user says:
"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:
Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...)
Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...)
Structured Requirements:
Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)
Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs)
Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given)
Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure:
...
Then the format shows:
Technical Specifications
| Feature | Specification | Benefit |
So perhaps the Technical Parameters Table is the same as the Technical Specifications section in the format. Therefore, the user might have intended that the Technical Specifications table should have the columns as per the example (Benefit) but the instruction mentions Application Scenario. Since the example is part of the required format, I should follow the example's columns (Feature, Specification, Benefit).
Therefore, I'll proceed with the example's format for the Technical Specifications table, using Benefit instead of Application Scenario. The Scenario Solution Paragraph can then address the application scenarios.
Now, moving on. Let's outline each section step by step.
Product Details: A brief intro. Mention the machine's purpose, key features like core motor, bearings, voltage compatibility, safety features, and warranty.
Technical Specifications Table: Features like Material Construction (metal with safety barriers), Voltage Compatibility (440V, 415V, etc.), Warranty (1 year), Core Motor & Bearings (high-quality, long-lasting), Safety Features (yellow barriers, emergency stops), Control Panel (modular, customizable sensors). Each with their specs and benefits.
Customization Guide: Mention adjustable roller configurations, control panel customization for sensors/actuators, modular components for different materials.
Get Inspiration: Highlight versatility, safety, and reliability. Maybe mention industries like automotive, construction, or electronics.
Choose Your Model Table: Parameters like Motor Power, Precision, Automation Level, Safety Features, etc. Base Model has standard specs, Advanced adds precision, Pro adds automation and higher specs. Use percentages or terms like "Enhanced" and "Premium".
Managers Note: First paragraph on breakthroughs (core motor, voltage flexibility, safety). Second paragraph guiding selection: Base for small workshops, Advanced for precision needs, Pro for high-volume automation.
Now, let's structure all this into markdown as per the example.
Wait, also need to ensure "With X, you can Y" sentences. For example, in the Product Details or Technical Specs. Maybe in the Product Details section, start with "With its robust metal construction, you can ensure durability in heavy-duty industrial applications."
Also, include comparative hints where possible. For example, in the Pro model's motor power, maybe "20% faster than traditional models" if that's plausible.
Let me draft each section now.
</think>