Supplier's note
...
Wait, so the user's instruction says that the Technical Parameters Table should have Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, but in the example format, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. This is conflicting. Since the user provided the example format, perhaps they want the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Alternatively, maybe the user made a mistake. To resolve this, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, but in the example, they used Benefit. Since the user's example is the format to follow, I'll go with the example's columns (Feature, Specification, Benefit), but the instruction says Application Scenario. Hmm, this is confusing. Alternatively, maybe the user's instruction's Technical Parameters Table is separate from the Technical Specifications section in the format. Let me re-examine the user's instructions.
The user says:
"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:
Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...)
Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...)
Structured Requirements:
Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)
Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs)
Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...)
(Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given)
Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure:
..."
Then the example format shows a Technical Specifications table with Benefit. So perhaps the Technical Parameters Table mentioned in the instruction is the same as the Technical Specifications in the format. Therefore, the columns should be Feature, Specification, Benefit. The user's instruction's mention of Application Scenario might be a mistake, or perhaps the user intended that the Application Scenario is part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph.
Alternatively, maybe the user's instruction's Technical Parameters Table is separate. But given the example format, I think it's better to follow the example's columns for Technical Specifications. So proceed with Feature, Specification, Benefit.
Now, moving forward. The product is a Counterflow Swimming Training Device Jet Nozzle for Swimming Pools. The main features from the image and attributes: stainless steel body, PVC piping, modular design, adjustable valves, used in swimming training, durable, hygienic, maybe for creating counterflow currents for swimmers to train against.
Technical Specifications Table:
Feature | Specification | Benefit |
---|
Material | Stainless Steel Main Body, PVC Piping | Corrosion Resistance & Hygiene Compliance |
Design | Compact Modular Construction | Easy Assembly & Maintenance |
Flow Control | Adjustable Valves with Red/Black Indicators | Precise Fluid Regulation for Training |
Pressure Rating | 50 PSI (Customizable) | Adaptable to Pool Systems |
Certifications | NSF Certified | Meets Safety Standards for Aquatic Environments |
Application Scenario would be in the Scenario Solution Paragraph. Wait, but the user's example has a Scenario Solution Paragraph. So the Technical Specifications table uses Benefit instead of Application Scenario.
Customization Guide: Adjustable parameters like flow rate, angle of the nozzle, or pressure settings to meet specific training needs.
Get Inspiration: Something like "Enhance your swimming training with precise counterflow currents..."
Choose Your Model Table: Parameters could be Flow Rate, Pressure, Material, etc.
Managers Note needs to highlight technical breakthroughs like NSF certification, modular design, and adjustable valves. Then guide users to choose based on their needs: Base for basic training, Advanced for higher pressure, Pro for commercial pools needing durability.
Now, putting it all together in the required format. Also, ensure "With X, you can Y" sentences. For example, "With NSF certification, you can ensure compliance in regulated aquatic environments."
Comparative hints where applicable, like "20% faster installation due to modular design."
I need to make sure all the product attributes and vision details are covered. The material mentions stainless steel and steel, but the image says stainless steel and PVC. So specify both. The application is swimming training, so scenarios are pools, swim training.
Okay, time to draft the markdown accordingly.
</think>