Luxury Rigid Boxes | High-end gift packaging (jewelry, shoes) | Thick cardboard (300 GSM ▲15% denser than industry standard), gold foil stamping (ASTM B467 compliant) | Premium aesthetics, durability, customizable designs (e.g., embossing) | Higher cost, heavier weight (▲20% bulkier than eco-friendly options) |
Eco-Friendly Packaging | Sustainable retail/gifting | 100% recycled cardboard (ISO 14024), biodegradable sponge liners (▲30% more durable than plastic) | Meets sustainability goals, lightweight (▲25% lighter than rigid boxes) | Limited design flexibility, less glossy finish compared to UV-coated options |
Custom Printed Boxes | Brand-specific products (promotions) | Pantone color accuracy (ΔE ≤2 ▲50% better than industry average), UV coating (ASTM D523) | High brand visibility, precise color matching, tactile finishes (e.g., matte/gloss lamination) | Longer production time, higher cost for small batches |
Standard Cardboard Boxes | General gift packaging (low-budget) | Standard cardboard (200 GSM), basic 4C printing | Cost-effective, widely available, lightweight (▲40% lighter than luxury variants) | Minimal customization, less durable (▲50% lower tear resistance vs. rigid boxes) |
Recyclable Packaging | Eco-conscious retail brands | Recyclable materials (EN 13430), lightweight design (▲20% less weight than non-recyclable) | Reduces environmental impact, meets regulatory standards | Less premium appearance, limited to basic shapes and colors |
Premium Gift Packaging | Luxury items (watches, high-end goods) | Silk-screen printing with embossing (ISO 12647 ▲40% finer detail), velvet lining | Ultra-luxurious feel, tactile luxury (e.g., soft-touch finishes) | Most expensive option, longer lead times due to complex manufacturing |