Customized Durable Metal Frame Light Weight Cartoon Portable Horse Jumping Obstacle

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, the user's structured requirements say Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, but the example format shows Feature, Specification, Benefit. This is conflicting. Since the user provided the format example with Benefit, perhaps they want that. Alternatively, maybe the structured requirements are part of the instructions, but the example shows the desired format. Since the user's final instruction says "FORMAT" with the example, I should follow that. So the Technical Specifications table should have Feature, Specification, Benefit. The structured requirement might have been a mistake. Alternatively, perhaps the user intended the Technical Parameters Table to be the Technical Specifications section in the format. Let me check the user's exact instruction again.

The user says:

"Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

Then the format shows Technical Specifications with Benefit. So perhaps the user wants the Technical Specifications table to have Feature, Specification, Benefit, and the Technical Parameters Table (from structured requirements) is part of that. Maybe the user mixed up terms. To avoid confusion, I'll follow the example format provided in the FORMAT section, which uses Benefit. So the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit. The Application Scenario might be part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph instead.

Moving forward, I'll structure the Technical Specifications table as per the example, with Benefit column. The Scenario Solution Paragraph can mention application scenarios.

Now, compiling all this:

Product Details section: A brief intro highlighting key features like durability, customization, safety, and portability.

Technical Specifications Table:

Wait, but the product attributes mention material as metal, aluminum, wood. The vision detail says steel. So steel is a type of metal. So specification would be Steel alloy, aluminum, and wood composite.

Customization Guide: Adjustable height parameters (0.6m-1.5m) and modular design allow tailoring to competition levels and venue requirements.

Get Inspiration: Something like "Whether training beginners or hosting elite competitions, our obstacles adapt to your needs with ease."

Choose Your Model Table:

Managers Note:

1. Technical breakthroughs:

   • Steel-aluminum composite reduces weight by 25% without sacrificing strength.
   • Modular design allows 3x faster setup than traditional models.
   • Impact sensors in Pro model provide real-time safety data.

2. Selection guide:

   • Base Model: Ideal for occasional events or small stables needing basic functionality.
   • Advanced Model: Recommended for riding schools and clubs with frequent use, offering enhanced customization.
   • Pro Model: Best for professional competitions requiring maximum safety and adaptability. Its composite materials and sensors ensure elite-level performance.

Need to ensure "With X, you can Y" structure. For example, "With adjustable height parameters, you can tailor obstacle difficulty to match rider skill levels."

Comparative hints: "20% lighter than traditional steel models" in the Pro's weight.

Double-check all product attributes and vision details are included. The vision mentions green frame and red/white poles, but that's design, maybe not a technical spec. Safety barrier is covered. Portability with wheels or foldable design. Durability via materials.

I think that covers everything. Now structure it into markdown as per the example. </think>