Disposable Underwear | Travel, medical needs, sensitive skin | Disposable (ASTM D6400 compostable) ▲ Base: 285 GSM (ISO 3801) ▲ Advanced: 320 GSM (▲) Softness: 4.8/5 (ISO 12945 tactile test) ▲ Advanced: 5/5 (▲) Breathability: 120 g/m²/h (ASTM D6701) ▲ Advanced: 150 g/m²/h (▲) Seamless (EN ISO 20647) Plus sizes up to 6XL (EN 13402) | Convenient, hygienic, eco-friendly if composted, style versatility (brief/boxer briefs) Cost-effective for single-use scenarios | Single-use limitation, potential environmental impact if not composted, less durable than reusable options |
Reusable Cotton Underwear | Daily wear, eco-conscious, gym | Reusable (ASTM D3512, 100 washes) Cotton fabric (EN 13402) Breathability: 180 g/m²/h (ASTM D6701) Mid-rise (EN ISO 63) | Durable, cost-effective long-term, eco-friendly if organic cotton | Requires washing, initial higher cost, less absorbent for sensitive needs |
Athletic Performance Underwear | High-intensity workouts, sports | Moisture-wicking (>90% evaporation, AATCC 195) Compression fit (EN ISO 13635 Level 2) Quick-drying (<30min, AATCC TM 118) | Enhances performance, sweat management, muscle support | Stiff fabric post-wash, less breathable, higher price point |
Medical/Incontinence Underwear | Incontinence, post-surgery recovery | 500ml absorbency (EN 12748) Leak-proof seams (ASTM F1867) Soft against skin (ISO 10273 irritation test) | High absorbency, secure fit, medical-grade comfort | Bulky design, less stylish, higher cost |
Luxury/Lingerie Underwear | Formal occasions, gifts | Silk blend (19 microns) Embroidery (ASTM D4850) Seamless (EN ISO 20647) Softness: 5/5 (ISO 12945) | Premium comfort, stylish design, luxurious feel | Fragile fabric, expensive, less practical for daily use |
Eco-Friendly Underwear | Environmentally conscious daily wear | Organic cotton (GOTS certified) Recycled polyester (Global Recycled Standard) Biodegradable packaging (OK Compost) | Sustainable materials, reduces environmental impact, stylish options | Limited color choices, higher cost, less durability than synthetic blends |