Supplier's note
...
Ah, okay, so the user's example format shows Technical Specifications with Benefit, but the structured requirements mention Technical Parameters Table with Application Scenario. This is conflicting. Since the user provided the example format, perhaps the Technical Specifications table should have Benefit instead of Application Scenario, and the Technical Parameters Table is another table. Wait, the user's instruction says:
"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:
Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...)
Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...)
Structured Requirements:
Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)
Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs)
Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...)
(Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given)
Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure:
..."
So the user wants two tables: the Technical Parameters Table (Feature, Spec, Application) and the Technical Specifications (maybe another table?), but in the example format, they have Technical Specifications with Benefit. Maybe the user made a mistake, but I should follow the example format since that's the final structure they want. The example shows Technical Specifications with Benefit, so perhaps that's the correct approach, and the structured requirements' Technical Parameters Table is part of that. Alternatively, maybe the Technical Specifications in the example is the same as the Technical Parameters Table. To avoid confusion, I'll proceed with the example's structure but ensure that the columns are as per the user's instructions. Wait, the user's example's Technical Specifications table has three columns: Feature, Specification, Benefit. The structured requirements say Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. This is conflicting. Since the user provided the example format, perhaps they want the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Maybe the structured requirements were a mistake, or perhaps the user intended the Technical Parameters Table to be part of the Technical Specifications. To resolve this, I'll follow the example format provided, as that's the final structure they want. So the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit. The Application Scenario can be part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph instead.
Alright, moving forward with that. Let me outline each section:
Product Details: A brief overview using the title and attributes. Mention PVC, metal frame, customizable size, safety features like non-slip surface, lifeguard chair, etc. Highlight durability and suitability for outdoor use.
Technical Specifications Table: Features like Material (PVC with UV resistance), Frame (Metal), Non-slip surface, Customizable size, Safety accessories (lifeguard chair, trash can, umbrella), etc. Specifications would be the details, and benefits like durability, safety, ease of installation, etc.
Customization Guide: Adjustable parameters like size, material thickness, color options. Mention that these can be tailored for specific needs like commercial vs residential.
Get Inspiration: Talk about how the pool can be used in different settings, emphasizing safety and customization.
Choose Your Model Table: Compare Base, Advanced, Pro models. Key attributes could be UV resistance, frame strength, included accessories, ease of setup, capacity. Base might have standard PVC and basic frame, Advanced has reinforced metal and more accessories, Pro has premium UV protection, commercial-grade frame, all accessories included.
Managers Note: First paragraph on technical breakthroughs like UV-resistant PVC, non-slip surface, customizable size. Second paragraph guiding users: Base for home use, Advanced for frequent use, Pro for commercial.
Now, ensuring "With X, you can Y" structure. For example, "With UV-resistant PVC material, you can ensure long-lasting durability in sunny climates."
Comparative hints where applicable. Maybe the Pro model's UV resistance is 50% higher than industry standard, or something like that.
Need to make sure all product attributes are covered: material (plastic/PVC), shape rectangle, frame style, above ground, application swim/swimming pool. Also, the vision details mention the non-slip surface, safety features, and the synthetic material's durability.
Also, the product attributes mention "accessories:pool" which might mean the pool comes with some accessories, so include those in the specs.
Alright, putting it all into markdown as per the example format.
</think>