Serpentine Belts | Automotive engines (Cummins diesel), industrial machinery | - Material: High-Density Rubber (ASTM D2000) ▲ - Ridges for Load Distribution (ISO 4308) - Noise Level: 43 dBA (quieter than refrigerator hum) - Service Life: 50,000+ hours (ISO 13400) | ▲ Efficiency: Reduces slippage by 40% (vs V-belts) Durability: 50% longer lifespan than industry standard (▲) Compatibility: Direct fit for Cummins ISZ13 engines | Requires precise installation tools Cost 30% higher than V-belts (▲ vs Industry Standard: $15/unit) |
V-Belts | Industrial machinery, agricultural equipment | - Material: Standard Rubber (ASTM D2000) - Cross-Section: Trapezoidal (ISO 4184) - Load Capacity: 15,000 N (EN 13400) | Cost-Effective: 50% cheaper than serpentine belts Widely Available: Compatible with legacy systems | Prone to slippage under 20% overload (▲) Shorter lifespan: 20,000 hours (Industry Standard) |
Timing Belts | Automotive camshaft systems, precision machinery | - Material: High-Tensile Polyurethane (ISO 3310) - Tooth Profile: Precision-machined (ISO 5294) - Tensile Strength: 120 MPa (ASTM D412) | Precision: ±0.01mm alignment accuracy Low Maintenance: No lubrication required | Fragile under misalignment (▲) Cost 2x higher than V-belts |
Multi-Rib Belts | Heavy-duty industrial applications | - Material: Reinforced Rubber (ASTM D412) - Rib Count: 3-5 (ISO 4185) - Load Capacity: 25,000 N (EN 13400) | High Load Handling: Supports 50% more torque than flat belts Versatile: Adjustable rib configurations | Bulky design increases space requirements (▲) Installation complexity: 40% higher labor time |
Flat Belts | Vintage machinery, low-torque systems | - Material: Cotton-Reinforced (ISO 3700) - Thickness: 3mm (ISO 3801) - Tensile Strength: 50 MPa (ASTM D412) | Simple Design: Easy to replace without specialized tools Low Cost: $5/unit (Industry Standard) | Poor load handling: Fails at 10,000 N (▲) Requires large pulleys (space-intensive) |
Poly-V Belts | High-power industrial systems | - Material: High-Temperature Rubber (ASTM D2000) - Cross-Section: Polygonal (ISO 4186) - Efficiency: 98% (ISO 534) | High Efficiency: 15% less energy loss than V-belts Compact Design: 30% smaller footprint | Fragile under misalignment (▲) Cost 40% higher than serpentine belts |