DG600D Multi Coin Acceptor Validator Vending Machine

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, the user's instruction says the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, but in the example format, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. There's a discrepancy here. The user might have made a mistake. Let me check again.

Looking at the user's instruction:

"Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

But in the example format provided by the user, the Technical Specifications table has columns Feature, Specification, Benefit. So perhaps the user intended that, but the initial instruction says Application Scenario. Maybe it's a mistake, and the example is correct. Since the example is given, perhaps follow the example's format for the Technical Specifications table (Feature, Specification, Benefit), and the Technical Parameters Table (which might be the same?) is different. Hmm, this is confusing. Wait, the user says "Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)" but then in the example format, the Technical Specifications section has Feature, Specification, Benefit. Maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications to have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. To resolve this, perhaps follow the example format given in the FORMAT section, since that's the final instruction. So the Technical Specifications table should have Feature, Specification, Benefit. The Application Scenario might be part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph instead.

Proceeding with that assumption.

Now, for the Technical Specifications table:

Features could be Material (plastic), Warranty (1 or 8 years), Currency Compatibility (CAD), Plug Type (Customizable), Validation Accuracy (maybe 99.9%?), Compliance (CE/RoHS), etc. The benefits would be like "Durable construction for heavy use", "Extended warranty for long-term reliability", etc.

Customization Guide: Adjustable parameters like currency type (CAD, USD, EUR), plug type, color, or material for different environments.

Get Inspiration: Something like "The DG600D Coin Acceptor Validator is designed for reliable coin validation in high-traffic amusement centers. With customizable features and robust construction, it ensures seamless integration into various gaming and vending systems."

Choose Your Model table: Parameters could be Validation Speed, Accuracy, MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures), Warranty. Base model might have 1 year warranty, 98% accuracy, 1000 coins/min. Advanced could be 99% accuracy, 1200 coins/min (+20%), 2-year warranty. Pro model 99.9% accuracy, 1500 coins/min (+50%), 8-year warranty.

Managers Note: First paragraph highlights breakthroughs like CAD compatibility, modular design, extended warranty. Second paragraph guides users: For basic needs, Base; for medium use, Advanced; for heavy-duty, Pro with 8-year warranty.

Need to ensure all product attributes are covered. The age group is 8 years, but that's probably for the amusement games, so mention suitability for family-friendly environments.

Also, the image mentions gears and springs, so maybe mention mechanical durability in the Technical Specifications.

Putting it all together now. </think>