DTH Hammer SD4 SD5 SD6 SD8 SD10 SD12 Drilling Bits for DTH Hammer

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, so the user's instruction says that the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, but in the example format, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. This is conflicting. Since the user provided the format example with Benefit, perhaps they want that. Alternatively, maybe the Technical Parameters Table is different from the Technical Specifications table. Let me check the exact wording again.

The user says: "Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the Technical Parameters Table is supposed to have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format, the Technical Specifications section has Feature, Specification, Benefit. So perhaps the user made a mistake, but I should follow the explicit instruction for the Technical Parameters Table. However, in the example format, they have a Technical Specifications section with three columns. Maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications to be the Technical Parameters Table. Therefore, perhaps the Technical Specifications table in the output should have the three columns as per the instruction: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.

Alternatively, maybe the user wants two tables. Hmm. Since the user's example shows the Technical Specifications table with Benefit, but the instruction says to make a Technical Parameters Table with Application Scenario, perhaps I need to clarify. But given that the user's example uses Benefit, maybe they want that. Alternatively, perhaps the user is mixing terms here. To resolve this, perhaps proceed with the example's structure but adjust the columns as per the instruction. Alternatively, since the user provided the example format, maybe the Technical Specifications table should follow that structure (Feature, Specification, Benefit), and the Technical Parameters Table is a separate one. But the user's instruction says "Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text: Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements: Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)...". So the Technical Parameters Table is part of the structured requirements. Therefore, the Technical Specifications section in the output should be the Technical Parameters Table with the three columns as specified. Therefore, I'll structure the Technical Specifications table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.

Now, moving on. The product attributes include material: carbon steel, steel; processing type: forging; type includes drill, hammer plate, hammer, DTH hammer; warranty: 6 months. The vision details mention the material is durable (carbon steel/steel), ribbed middle for grip, top protrusions for engagement with a mechanism. The application scenarios would be in mining or construction drilling operations.

For the Technical Specifications table:

Features could be Material, Construction, Design, etc. Let's see:

• Material: Carbon Steel/Steel, forged. Specification: Forged carbon steel and high-grade steel. Application Scenario: Heavy-duty mining and construction drilling operations requiring durability.

• Ribbed Middle Section: Feature, Specification: Fluted, ribbed structure, Application Scenario: Provides structural reinforcement and grip during high-impact drilling.

• Top Protrusions: Feature: Circular protrusions, Specification: Designed for secure engagement with drilling machinery, Application Scenario: Ensures compatibility with standard drilling equipment for consistent performance.

• Warranty: 6 months, but maybe that's a product attribute, so perhaps not in the technical specs table.

Next, the Customization Guide. The user wants a customization hint like "Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs". The product's image suggests modularity, so maybe adjusting the ribbed section or protrusions for different attachments. So something like: "Adjustable ribbed section dimensions and protrusion patterns to accommodate specialized drilling equipment or custom attachment requirements."

Scenario Solution Paragraph: "Medium thickness fabric..." example. Here, perhaps: "The ribbed structural design is ideal for high-impact drilling in rocky terrains, ensuring stability and reducing wear during prolonged use."

Choose Your Model table: The user's example has three models (Base, Advanced, Pro) compared against industry benchmarks. The input lists SD4 to SD12, but the user's input doesn't specify three models. Wait, the product title includes SD4 SD5 SD6 SD8 SD10 SD12. So perhaps the models are SD4, SD6, SD12 as base, advanced, pro? Not sure. Alternatively, the user might expect three versions, so perhaps group them into smaller, medium, larger sizes. Let me assume that SD4 is base, SD8 advanced, SD12 pro. But need to check the parameters. The key attributes could be size, torque capacity, durability, etc. Since the material is same, perhaps the differences are in size and performance specs. For example:

But need to make up plausible specs based on the SD numbers. Alternatively, the SD numbers might indicate size, so SD4 is smaller, SD12 is larger. The Pro model could have higher specs. The user's example shows using +15%, so perhaps incremental improvements.

Managers Note needs two paragraphs: first explaining three technical breakthroughs (maybe material forging, ribbed design, protrusion compatibility), and second guiding users to choose based on their needs. For example, the Pro model's higher pressure allows for harder rock drilling, etc.

Also, use "With X, you can Y" structure. For example, "With forged carbon steel construction, you can achieve enhanced durability in harsh mining environments."

Comparative hints: "20% faster than traditional models" if applicable. Since the product is DTH (down-the-hole) hammers, maybe mention efficiency compared to other types.

Putting it all together in markdown as per the format. Need to ensure all sections are covered. Let me start drafting each part step by step. </think>