DWIN 5 Inch Display LCD Panel 800*480 HMI Android System RK3566 TFT Display 5" Android Board Capacitive Touch Screen Module

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, the user's example format shows the Technical Specifications table with Benefit, but the structured requirements say Application Scenario. This is conflicting. Since the user provided both, perhaps they made a mistake. But the user's instruction says "Structured Requirements: Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)". Therefore, I should follow the structured requirements and use Application Scenario instead of Benefit. But the example format shows Benefit. Hmm, this is a problem. Maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have Application Scenario, but in the example, they used Benefit. Since the user's instruction is the main guide, I'll proceed with the structured requirements, using Application Scenario. Alternatively, maybe the user made a typo, and the example is correct. Let me think again.

Looking at the user's instruction:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the user explicitly states the Technical Parameters Table must have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. Therefore, in the Technical Specifications section, the columns should be Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. The example format provided by the user might have an error, but I should follow the instruction's structured requirements.

Therefore, in the Technical Specifications table, the third column is Application Scenario. So I need to adjust that.

Now, proceeding:

Technical Specifications Table:

Feature: Display Type, Specification: IPS TFT LCD, Application Scenario: Industrial control panels requiring wide viewing angles.

Similarly for other features.

Next, the Scenario Solution Paragraph: This should be a paragraph explaining how different parameters suit different scenarios, like the example given with fabric thickness. So perhaps something like "The 5-inch screen size is ideal for compact devices where space is limited, such as handheld terminals or embedded systems. The 250 nit brightness ensures visibility in well-lit environments, making it suitable for outdoor kiosks or factory floors."

Customization Guide: The image mentions customization options like display size and touch sensitivity. So the hint could be "Adjustable display size and touch sensitivity parameters to meet specific interface customization needs."

Choose Your Model Table: Need to create three models (Base, Advanced, Pro) with parameters. Since the product is an Android board with RK3566, perhaps the key attributes could be:

• Processor Performance (e.g., CPU speed)
• Touch Response Time
• Storage Capacity
• Operating Temperature Range

Base Model: Standard specs, like RK3566 at base clock, standard touch response, 16GB storage, -20°C to 60°C.

Advanced: +15% CPU performance, 20% faster touch response, 32GB storage, -30°C to 70°C.

Pro: +30% CPU, 30% faster touch, 64GB storage, -40°C to 80°C.

Comparing to industry benchmarks, maybe the Pro's operating temp is 30% better than industry standard.

Managers Note: First paragraph highlights three breakthroughs. For example:

1. RK3566 processor enabling multi-tasking and high-speed data processing.
2. Capacitive touch screen with 20% faster response than industry standards.
3. 250 nit brightness for visibility in varied lighting.

Second paragraph guides selection: Base for basic control systems, Advanced for moderate use with better temps, Pro for extreme environments needing durability.

Now, structuring all this into markdown as per the example format, but adjusting the Technical Specifications table to have Application Scenario instead of Benefit. Wait, but in the example format given by the user, they have Benefit. Since the user's instruction and example conflict, but the structured requirements are explicit, I'll go with the structured requirements. Alternatively, maybe the user intended the example to be correct, and the structured requirements were a mistake. Hmm, this is a bit confusing. Let me check again.

The user's instruction says:

"Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the Technical Parameters Table must have those three columns. Therefore, the example format provided by the user (which uses Benefit) is incorrect, and I should follow the structured requirements. Therefore, in the Technical Specifications table, the third column is Application Scenario.

Proceeding with that.

Now, putting it all together in markdown as per the user's example format, but with the correct columns for the Technical Specifications table. </think>