Common Rail Fuel Injectors | High-Performance Diesel Engines | Operating Pressure: 1800 bar (Industry Standard) ▲ 2000 bar (Our Base) ▲ 2500 bar (Our Advanced) (ISO 16912) | ▲ Advanced: 25% better fuel atomization (reduces emissions) High precision injection timing | Higher cost than mechanical injectors Advanced requires specialized maintenance (e.g., piezoelectric actuators) |
Mechanical Fuel Injectors | Older/Heavy-Duty Engines | Operating Pressure: 1500 bar (Industry Standard) | Simpler design (no electronics) Lower cost Rugged for harsh environments | Lower fuel efficiency (15–20% less than common rail) Less adaptable to emissions standards |
Unit Injectors | Medium-Duty Engines (e.g., Farm Equipment) | Operating Pressure: 1800 bar (Industry Standard) Steel Body (ASTM A314) | Balance of cost and performance Easier maintenance than common rail | Limited scalability for high-power applications Slower response time (0.8ms vs. 0.3ms in Advanced) |
Piezoelectric Injectors | Modern Passenger Vehicles | Response Time: 0.5ms (Industry Standard) ▲ 0.3ms (Our Advanced) (ISO 16912) | Ultra-fast actuation improves emissions control (▲ Advanced: 15% lower NOx) | Fragile piezoelectric crystals require careful handling Higher cost than hydraulic systems |
Hydraulic Injectors | Industrial Machinery (e.g., Generators) | Flow Rate: 50 L/hr (Industry Standard) ▲ 60 L/hr (Our Advanced) (ISO 16912) | High flow capacity for continuous operation Low maintenance | Bulky design limits space efficiency Dependent on external hydraulic systems |
Pneumatic Injectors | Low-Pressure Applications (e.g., HVAC) | Pressure Range: 50–200 bar (Industry Standard) | Simple operation Cost-effective for low-pressure needs | Inefficient for high-demand scenarios Limited to non-critical applications |