Supplier's note
...
So the user's example format for Technical Specifications uses Benefit, but the structured requirement says Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). This is conflicting. Since the user provided the example format, perhaps they want the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Alternatively, maybe the Technical Parameters Table is separate. Wait, the user's instruction says:
"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:
Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...)
Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...)
Structured Requirements:
Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)
Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs)
Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...)
(Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given)
Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure:
..."
So the Technical Parameters Table (with Feature, Spec, Application Scenario) is part of the structured requirements, but in the example format, the Technical Specifications table has Benefit. Maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications section in the example to be the Technical Parameters Table. So perhaps the columns should be Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example, they used Benefit. To resolve this, perhaps the user made a mistake, but since the example is more concrete, I'll follow the example's structure for the Technical Specifications table (Feature, Specification, Benefit). Alternatively, maybe the Technical Parameters Table is a separate table. Hmm, this is confusing. Let me proceed by following the example's structure for the Technical Specifications, since the user provided that as the format to follow. So the Technical Specifications table will have columns Feature, Specification, Benefit.
Now, proceeding with that.
Technical Specifications:
Features would be Material Composition, Light Source, Design Customization, Structural Integrity.
Specifications: Acrylic and glass layered construction with neon lighting; High-intensity neon tubes; Fully customizable text and shapes via CNC machining; Precision CNC manufacturing with 0.1mm tolerance.
Benefits: Durability and clarity; Vibrant, long-lasting illumination; Personalized aesthetics; Industrial-grade precision.
Application Scenario would have been in another table, but since the example uses Benefit, I'll stick with that.
Customization Guide: Adjustable parameters like size (up to 120cm), color (gold, silver, etc.), and design elements (heart accents, fonts). Hints to meet special needs like corporate branding or weddings.
Get Inspiration: Highlight the blend of customization and luxury, suitable for birthdays, anniversaries, etc.
Choose Your Model Table: Parameters could be Light Intensity, Material Thickness, Customization Complexity. Base Model has standard specs, Advanced adds brighter neon and thicker acrylic, Pro offers premium materials and complex designs. Comparing to industry benchmarks with percentages.
Managers Note: Technical breakthroughs like layered design for durability, energy-efficient neon, CNC precision. Then guide users: Base for basic needs, Advanced for durability, Pro for high-end events.
Need to ensure "With X, you can Y" sentences. For example, "With layered acrylic and glass, you can achieve a premium look..." and include comparative hints like "20% brighter than standard neon signs".
Also, the product attributes mention "shape:customized", so customization is a key point.
I think that's a solid plan. Now, time to structure it into markdown as per the example.
</think>