EPS Molding Machine | Food packaging, fruit/vegetable storage | 1. Material: EPS (Expanded Polystyrene) 2. Capacity: 500 kg/hr (ISO 10793) 3. Warranty: 3 years (▲▲▲ vs industry 1-2 years) | 1. Lightweight, cost-effective containers 2. High production volume 3. Extended warranty coverage | 1. Lower heat resistance (max 80°C) 2. Requires proper disposal for environmental compliance |
EPP Molding Machine | Automotive parts, protective packaging | 1. Material: EPP (Expanded Polypropylene) 2. Heat Resistance: 120°C (ASTM D648) 3. Recyclability: 100% (ISO 14021) | 1. Durable, reusable 2. Withstands high temperatures 3. Fully recyclable | 1. Higher material cost 2. Slower production speed (▲ vs EPS) |
EPE Molding Machine | Cushioning, lightweight packaging | 1. Material: EPE (Expanded Polyethylene) 2. Density: 20-50 kg/m³ (ISO 849) 3. Noise Level: 43 dBA (▲▲ quieter than refrigerator hum) | 1. Soft, shock-absorbing 2. Eco-friendly foam 3. Low noise operation | 1. Lower structural strength 2. Limited customization options |
Fully Automated Tier | High-volume industrial production | 1. Automation: CNC-controlled (ISO 9283) 2. Precision: ±0.5mm tolerance 3. Safety: Dual sensor barriers (IEC 60204) | 1. Consistent output quality 2. Reduced labor costs 3. Enhanced worker safety | 1. Higher upfront cost 2. Requires skilled operators |
Customization Tier | Specialty packaging (e.g., fish/medical) | 1. Shapes: 20+ mold designs (▲▲▲ vs industry 5-8) 2. Airtightness: 0.1% leakage (ASTM F1927) 3. Insulation: R-value 3.5 (ISO 8301) | 1. Tailored to niche markets 2. Enhanced product preservation 3. Energy-efficient storage | 1. Longer setup time per batch 2. Higher mold costs |
Sustainable Tier | Eco-conscious industries | 1. Material: Recycled EPS (70% post-consumer waste) 2. Energy Use: 15 kWh/kg (▲▲▲ vs industry 25 kWh/kg) 3. Carbon Footprint: 20% lower (ISO 14064) | 1. Meets green standards 2. Lower operational costs 3. Market differentiation | 1. Slightly reduced foam density 2. Limited supplier network for recycled materials |