Supplier's note
...
Wait, so the user's example shows Technical Specifications with columns Feature, Specification, Benefit. But in the structured requirements above, they mention Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). There's a discrepancy here. Which one to follow?
The user's instruction says "Structured Requirements" which includes the Technical Parameters Table with those three columns. But the example format shows Technical Specifications with Benefit instead of Application Scenario. The user might have conflicting instructions here. Since the user provided the format example, perhaps they want to follow that. Alternatively, maybe the structured requirements are part of the Technical Specifications table.
Alternatively, perhaps the user wants two tables: the Technical Parameters Table as per the structured requirements, and the Technical Specifications as per the example. But that's unclear. To resolve, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario as per the structured requirements. But the example shows Benefit. Since the user provided the format example, perhaps they want to follow that, but the structured requirements might be additional.
Alternatively, maybe the user made a mistake, but I need to follow the instructions step by step.
Wait, the user's instruction says:
"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:
Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...)
Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...)
Structured Requirements:
Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)
Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs)
Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...)
(Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given)
Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure:
..."
So the Technical Parameters Table must have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. The example format shows Technical Specifications with Benefit. Since the user's instruction says to follow the structured requirements, perhaps the Technical Specifications table should be the Technical Parameters Table with the three columns. But in the example format, they have a Technical Specifications section with Benefit. Maybe the user wants both? Hmm.
Alternatively, perhaps the user's example is a template, and the structured requirements are part of that. Let me proceed by following the structured requirements for the Technical Parameters Table, but in the example format, the Technical Specifications table has Benefit. Maybe the user wants the Technical Specifications table to include the application scenario as a benefit? Not sure. Alternatively, perhaps the user made a mistake in the example, and the correct columns are as per the structured requirements. Since the user is asking to follow the structured requirements, I'll proceed with the three columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario for the Technical Specifications table.
Wait, but in the example given in the user's instruction, the Technical Specifications table has Benefit. Maybe the user intended that the Technical Parameters Table is part of the Technical Specifications section, but with the three columns. Alternatively, perhaps the user wants two tables. This is confusing. To resolve, perhaps the user wants the Technical Specifications table to have the three columns as per the structured requirements. Let me proceed with that.
So, for the Technical Specifications table:
Feature | Specification | Application Scenario
Examples:
Material: Stainless Steel (304/316 Grade) | CE Certified, Corrosion-resistant | Outdoor decks, coastal buildings
Design Variety: Cylindrical, Square, Rectangular | Customizable shapes | Modern villas, commercial offices
Mounting Options: Wall-Mounted/Ground-Fixed | Universal brackets | Balconies, staircases
Safety Features: Rounded Edges, Smooth Surfaces | Meets safety standards | Hotels, public malls
Customization: Size/Shape/Finish | Bespoke solutions | Custom architectural projects
Wait, but the product attributes mention "type:glass railing". So maybe a feature about glass integration?
Alternatively, the product is glass railing with stainless steel posts. So maybe a feature like Glass Integration: Tempered Safety Glass | Shatter-resistant | Balconies, terraces
Certification: CE | Compliance with EU standards | International projects
Material: Stainless Steel (304/316) | Corrosion-resistant | Outdoor, marine environments
Application scenarios would be the areas listed in the product attributes: porch, stair, apartment, deck, villa, building, indoor, office, mall, outdoor, hotel, balcony, indoor and outdoor, flooring.
So each feature's application scenario would be the relevant areas.
Now, moving on to the Customization Guide: "Adjustable dimensions (height/width) and finish options (brushed/matte) to meet specific architectural designs and safety requirements."
Scenario Solution Paragraph: "Medium thickness stainless steel balusters are ideal for residential staircases, offering a balance between aesthetics and safety. For high-traffic commercial areas, the reinforced Pro Model with 316-grade steel ensures long-term durability in heavy use."
Choose Your Model table:
Parameters could be Material Grade, Load Capacity, Customization Level, Corrosion Resistance, etc.
Base Model: 304 steel, standard load, basic customization
Advanced: 316, higher load, moderate customization
Pro: 316, highest load, full customization
Compare against industry benchmarks like traditional iron (lower corrosion resistance) or lower-grade steel.
Managers Note: Highlight three breakthroughs like 316-grade material, enhanced load capacity, customizable finishes. Then guide users: residential use Base/Advanced, commercial Pro.
Now, putting it all together in markdown as per the format.
</think>