Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Ah, okay, the user's structured requirements mention a Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, but in the example format provided, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. So perhaps there's a mistake here, but the user's final format example uses the Benefit column instead of Application Scenario. Since the user provided the example format, I should follow that. The user might have intended the Technical Specifications table as per the example, with Benefit, and the Technical Parameters Table as a separate table? Wait, no, the user says "convert the following information into a table and descriptive text" and then specifies the Technical Parameters Table with those columns. But the example format includes Technical Specifications with Benefit. Maybe the user made an error, but since the example is the final format to follow, I should use the columns as per the example. Alternatively, perhaps the Technical Specifications in the example is the same as the Technical Parameters Table. Maybe the user intended that the Technical Specifications table is the same as the Technical Parameters Table, but with Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Hmm, this is a bit conflicting, but given the example format, I'll proceed with the example's structure for the Technical Specifications table (Feature, Specification, Benefit), and perhaps the Application Scenario is part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph.

Alternatively, maybe the user wants two tables: one Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, and another as in the example. But the example's format doesn't include that. Since the user's final format example includes Technical Specifications with Benefit, I'll go with that, assuming that the user might have made a mistake in the initial instruction. Alternatively, perhaps the Application Scenario is part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph. Let me proceed with the example's structure as the priority.

So, moving forward:

Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit.

Now, the product attributes are: characters:rigid, feature:fire retardant, material:plastic (PVC, solid type). The image details add more: rectangular cross-section, certifications, etc.

So for Technical Specifications:

Feature | Specification | Benefit

Material: PVC Plastic | Rigid, Solid Construction | Durability, resistance to moisture/chemicals

Fire Retardancy | Meets UL 94 V-0 Standard | Prevents flame spread in emergencies

Cross-Section | Rectangular | Easy cable insertion and organization

Certifications | CE, RoHS Compliant | Ensures safety and environmental standards

Installation | Snap-Fit Design | Quick and tool-free assembly

Wait, the image mentions "open ends provide access", maybe that's part of the feature. Or maybe "Snap-Fit Design" is inferred from ease of installation.

Alternatively, the "rigid" character is a feature, so:

Feature: Rigidity | Specification: Rigid PVC Construction | Benefit: Maintains structural integrity under load

Fire Retardancy: as above.

Material: PVC Plastic | Solid Construction | Durability, chemical resistance.

Cross-Section: Rectangular | Open-Ended Design | Easy access and cable management.

Certifications: CE, RoHS | Compliance with safety standards | Ensures reliability and regulatory adherence.

Installation: Snap-Fit Mechanism | Tool-Free Assembly | Quick installation without tools.

That might cover the main points.

Customization Guide: Adjustable dimensions (length, width) to fit specific cable counts. Color coding options for circuit identification. Custom engravings for labeling.

Scenario Solution Paragraph: The rectangular cross-section allows for easy organization in commercial buildings, while fire retardancy makes it suitable for high-risk areas like industrial plants.

Choose Your Model Table: Need to compare Base, Advanced, Pro. Key attributes could be Fire Resistance, Load Capacity, Chemical Resistance.

Base Model: Fire Resistance (UL 94 HB), Load Capacity 100kg/m², Chemical Resistance Standard.

Advanced: UL 94 V-2, 150kg/m² (+50%?), Chemical Resistance +20%

Pro: UL 94 V-0, 200kg/m² (+100% from Base?), Chemical Resistance +40% (triple industry standard? Maybe adjust numbers to fit).

Wait, the example in the user's instruction shows "+15%", "+30%", so maybe the Pro is +30% over Base. Let's see:

Suppose Base has Fire Resistance UL 94 HB, Advanced V-2 (+1 level), Pro V-0 (+2 levels). But the user's example uses percentages, so maybe numerical values.

Alternatively, for Load Capacity:

Base: 100kg/m²

Advanced: 115kg/m² (+15%)

Pro: 130kg/m² (+30%)

But maybe better to use more significant improvements. Alternatively, for Fire Resistance, the Base might have a lower rating, and Pro higher.

Alternatively, for Chemical Resistance, the Pro could have triple the industry standard, so if industry is 10, Pro is 30.

Managers Note: Highlight Pro's chemical resistance enabling use in chemical plants, Advanced's load capacity for commercial buildings, etc. Guide users: Residential use Base, commercial Advanced, industrial Pro.

Need to ensure all parts are covered. Also, use "With X, you can Y" in the Product Details and other sections where applicable.

Putting it all together now. </think>