Supplier's note
...
So in the format example, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. But the structured requirements mention Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. There's a conflict here. Since the user provided the format example, I should follow that. Maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications to be the table with Benefit, and the Application Scenario is part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph. Alternatively, perhaps the user made a mistake. To resolve, I'll proceed with the format example, as it's the final instruction. So the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit. The Scenario Solution Paragraph will handle application scenarios.
Proceeding with that, let's outline each section.
Product Details: A brief intro about the product, mentioning its use for jewelry carving, precision, durability, etc.
Technical Specifications Table:
Feature | Specification | Benefit |
---|
Adjustable Ball Vice Base | 360° rotation with 15° incremental adjustments | Enables precise positioning for intricate jewelry designs |
Replaceable Diamond Tool Heads | Tungsten Carbide, 10+ interchangeable heads | Achieves sharp, precise cuts on hard gemstones |
Hex Key Wrench Included | T-shaped ergonomic handle | Quick adjustments for optimal tool head alignment |
Durable Construction | Aluminum & Steel Alloy Frame (9kg) | Ensures stability during high-precision tasks |
Compact Modular Holder | Holds 8 tool heads | Streamlines workflow with easy access to tools |
Customization Guide: Suggest adjusting the base angle for specific angles, choosing tool heads based on material hardness, and adding custom heads for specialized tasks.
Get Inspiration: Highlight versatility and precision, maybe mention different jewelry types it can handle.
Choose Your Model Table:
Parameter | Base Model | Advanced Model | Pro Model |
---|
Precision Level | ±0.1mm | ±0.05mm (+50%) | ±0.02mm (+300%)* |
Tool Head Hardness | 900HV | 1200HV (+33%) | 1500HV (+66%)* |
Weight | 9kg (Standard Stability) | 9kg (Same Stability) | 9kg (Same Stability) – maybe another parameter like tool head variety? |
Wait, the product's weight is 9kg, so maybe that's fixed. Need another parameter. Maybe number of tool heads included. Base: 5, Advanced: 8, Pro: 12. Or material for the heads. Alternatively, adjust other features. Let me think. The key attributes could be precision, tool head hardness, and number of included heads. | | | |
Managers Note: First paragraph: breakthroughs like tungsten carbide heads (hardness), adjustable base for precision, ergonomic design. Second paragraph: guide users to choose Base for basic tasks, Advanced for mid-range, Pro for high-end with complex designs.
Need to ensure "With X, you can Y" sentences in the Technical Specifications benefits. For example, "With 360° rotation, you can position the vice for precise carving angles."
Also include comparative hints where possible. For example, Pro model's hardness is 66% higher than Base.
Okay, putting it all together now.
</think>