Eurocave Style Wine Cellar Storage System Sliding Wood and Metal Wine Rack Cases

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Ah, so in the example format provided by the user, the Technical Specifications table has columns Feature, Specification, Benefit. But in the structured requirements above, it says Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). There's a conflict here. Since the user provided an example format, perhaps they expect the table as per the example (with Benefit), even though the structured requirements mention Application Scenario. Maybe the user made a mistake, but since the example is more specific, I should follow the example's format. Alternatively, perhaps the structured requirements are part of the instructions but the example format takes precedence. To resolve this, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit as per the example, and the Technical Parameters Table (from structured requirements) is a different table? Wait, the user says:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the user is asking for a Technical Parameters Table with those three columns. But in the example format, the Technical Specifications table has Benefit instead of Application Scenario. So perhaps the user wants two tables? Or maybe the Technical Specifications in the example is the same as the Technical Parameters Table. The user might have conflicting instructions here. To avoid confusion, perhaps the Technical Specifications section in the example is the same as the Technical Parameters Table. Therefore, I should use the columns as per the structured requirements (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). But the example shows Benefit. Hmm. Alternatively, maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications to have Benefit, and the Technical Parameters Table is another table. But since the user's example format includes Technical Specifications with Benefit, perhaps that's the correct path. Maybe the structured requirements were part of the instructions but the example format is the actual required structure. Since the user provided the example format, I should follow that. So the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit. The Application Scenario might be part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph instead.

Alright, proceeding with the example format's table structure. Let me outline each section step by step.

First, Product Details: A brief overview. Mention the product as a Eurocave-style storage system, combining wood and metal, eco-friendly, suitable for home or business.

Technical Specifications table: Features like Material (wood & metal), Certification (CE), Customization (adjustable holes), etc. Specifications would be the details, and Benefits the advantages.

Customization Guide: Highlight adjustable holes, maybe depth of drawer, etc., to meet specific needs like different bottle sizes or storage requirements.

Get Inspiration: Encourage customers by suggesting use cases like home bars, restaurants, or as gifts.

Choose Your Model table: Compare Base, Advanced, Pro models. Parameters could be Load Capacity, Customization Options, Material Quality, etc. Base might have standard specs, Advanced with 15% improvement, Pro with 30% or premium materials.

Manager's Note: First paragraph on technical breakthroughs like eco-friendly materials, adjustable design, stacking capability. Second paragraph guiding users: Business gifts might choose Base, restaurants Advanced for more customization, Pro for high-end durability.

Need to ensure "With X, you can Y" sentences. For example, "With adjustable drawer holes, you can accommodate various bottle sizes effortlessly."

Also include comparative hints where possible, like "30% higher load capacity than industry standards."

Now, let's structure each part with the given info.

Product Details section: Start with the title, mention materials, design, certifications, and applications.

Technical Specifications table:

Wait, but the product attributes mention "eco-friendly" as a feature but not specifying FSC. Maybe just state eco-friendly materials. The certification is CE, not FSC. So adjust:

Eco-Friendly | Made from sustainable wood and recycled metal components | Reduces environmental impact

Application Scenario for each feature? Wait, no, in the example table, it's Benefit. So okay.

Customization Guide: "Adjustable hole spacing and drawer depth can be customized to meet specific bottle dimensions or storage requirements, ensuring optimal fit and organization."

Get Inspiration: "Elevate your wine storage with our Eurocave-inspired system. Perfect for home cellars, restaurants, or as a luxury gift, this blend of vintage charm and functionality ensures your collection stays organized and displayed beautifully."

Choose Your Model Table:

Manager's Note:

1. Three technical breakthroughs:

• Eco-friendly materials reduce environmental impact while maintaining durability.
• Adjustable hole design allows flexibility for diverse bottle types.
• Interlocking stacking joints optimize space without compromising stability.

2. Version selection:

• Base Model: Ideal for home users needing basic storage with eco-conscious materials.
• Advanced Model: Restaurants or collectors requiring adjustable features for varied inventory.
• Pro Model: High-end venues or collectors needing premium materials and maximum load capacity.

Check for "With X, you can Y" structure. In the Technical Specifications benefits, maybe rephrase some. For example, "With our adjustable hole design, you can easily accommodate various bottle sizes."

Also, include comparative hints like "30% higher load capacity than industry standards" in the Pro model's note.

Putting it all together in markdown format as per the example. </think>