European and American Color Enamel Butterfly Handmade Rope Woven Adjustable Crystal Beads butterfly Bracelet Set

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, in the user's provided example format, the Technical Specifications table has columns Feature, Specification, Benefit. But in the structured requirements, the user says Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). So there's a contradiction here. The user might have intended the Technical Specifications to be the table with Feature, Specification, Benefit, but the structured requirements mention Application Scenario. Since the user's example format is more concrete, perhaps they want the Technical Specifications table as per the example (Feature, Specification, Benefit), and the Technical Parameters Table (with Application Scenario) is another table? But the user's instruction says "convert the following information into a table and descriptive text" with the Technical Parameters Table as per the structured requirements.

Hmm, this is confusing. Let me re-examine the user's exact instructions:

The user says:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the Technical Parameters Table must have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. The example format given by the user includes a Technical Specifications table with Benefit instead. Therefore, the user might have made an error in the example, but since the structured requirements are explicit, I should follow the columns as per the structured requirements.

Therefore, the Technical Specifications section (as per the example format) should actually be the Technical Parameters Table with the three columns. But in the example format, the user has "Technical Specifications" as a section with Benefit. Maybe the user intended that the Technical Specifications section is the Technical Parameters Table. To resolve this, perhaps the Technical Specifications in the example is the same as the Technical Parameters Table. So I'll proceed with the columns as per the structured requirements: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.

Now, proceeding with that in mind.

Technical Parameters Table:

Features would be things like Material, Design, Adjustable Clasp, etc.

Specifications would be Alloy, Enamel Butterfly Pendant, etc.

Application Scenario would be occasions like weddings, parties, etc.

Customization Guide: The image mentions customization options like adding charms, changing bead colors, adjusting length. So the hint would be "Adjustable length and bead color options to meet personalized style preferences."

Scenario Solution Paragraph: Example given is about fabric thickness for shirts. Here, maybe "The adjustable clasp design ensures the bracelet fits comfortably on wrists of various sizes, making it ideal for gifting to friends or family members with different wrist dimensions."

Choose Your Model table: Since the product is a bracelet set, perhaps the models are different versions with varying features. Let's assume three models: Basic, Premium, Luxury.

Parameters could be:

• Material Quality: Alloy (Base), Sterling Silver (Advanced), 14K Gold Plated (Pro)
• Crystal Size: Small (Base), Medium (Advanced), Large (Pro)
• Pendant Complexity: Simple (Base), Engraved (Advanced), Gemstone Inlay (Pro)
• Adjustable Range: 6-7 inches (Base), 6-8 inches (Advanced), 6-9 inches (Pro)

Comparing against industry benchmarks (maybe industry standard is Alloy with small crystals, etc.)

Manager's Note:

First paragraph: Technical breakthroughs could be the adjustable clasp (ensuring comfort), the enamel coating on pendants (durability), and the crystal beads (sparkle).

Second paragraph: Guide users based on their needs. For casual wear, Basic; for formal events, Advanced; for weddings, Pro.

Also, using "With X, you can Y" structure. For example, "With the adjustable clasp, you can comfortably wear the bracelet on any wrist size."

Comparative hints: "Our Pro model's 14K gold plating offers 30% longer durability than standard alloy finishes."

Now, putting all this into the markdown structure as per the example provided by the user, but adjusting the Technical Specifications table to have Application Scenario instead of Benefit. Wait, but in the example format, the user has Benefit. Maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications to be the Technical Parameters Table with the three columns. Let me check again.

Wait, the user's example format shows:

Technical Specifications

But according to the structured requirements, it should be Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. This is conflicting. Since the user provided an example, perhaps they expect the Technical Specifications to have Benefit, but the structured requirements mention Application Scenario. This is a problem. To resolve, perhaps the user made a mistake, and I should follow the example's structure because the example is more specific. Alternatively, maybe the Application Scenario is part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph.

Alternatively, perhaps the Technical Parameters Table is separate from the Technical Specifications. But the user's instruction says "convert the following information into a table and descriptive text" where the tables include the Technical Parameters Table (with Application Scenario).

This is a bit confusing. To proceed, I'll follow the example format provided by the user, which uses Benefit, and perhaps the structured requirements were a mistake. Alternatively, maybe the user wants two tables: one Technical Specifications with Benefit and another Technical Parameters with Application Scenario. But the user's example doesn't have that.

Alternatively, maybe the Application Scenario is part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph. Let me proceed with the example's structure, as the user provided it as the required format. So the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit.

Therefore, I'll structure the Technical Specifications table with those columns. The Application Scenario can be part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph.

Proceeding with that:

Technical Specifications Table:

Scenario Solution Paragraph: "The adjustable clasp design ensures the bracelet fits comfortably on wrists of various sizes, making it ideal for gifting to friends or family members with different wrist dimensions. The bohemian style is perfect for casual outings or parties, while the elegant butterfly pendants add a touch of sophistication for weddings or engagements."

Customization Guide: "Adjustable length and bead color options allow customers to personalize their bracelets to match their unique style preferences or specific event requirements."

Choose Your Model Table:

Assuming three models: Basic, Premium, Luxury.

Manager's Note:

First paragraph: Three technical breakthroughs:

1. Adjustable clasp ensures universal fit.
2. Enamel coating on pendants for durability.
3. High-quality crystals for enhanced sparkle.

Second paragraph:

• Basic: Casual wear, everyday use.
• Advanced: Semi-formal events, parties.
• Pro: Weddings, high-end occasions.

Including comparative hints like "Our Pro model's 14K gold plating offers 30% longer durability than standard alloy finishes."

Now, putting all this into the markdown structure as per the example. Also, using "With X, you can Y" where possible. For example, "With the adjustable clasp, you can comfortably wear the bracelet on any wrist size."

I need to ensure that all product attributes are covered: application scenarios (anniversary, engagement, gift, party, wedding), materials (alloy, crystal), style (bohemian), shape (butterfly), etc.

Also, the vision details mention six different colors, so maybe in the product details section, highlight the variety of colors available.

Final check for the Manager's Note: The example given by the user includes explaining three technical breakthroughs using features. So, the three features could be the adjustable clasp, the alloy material with enamel, and the crystal beads.

Yes, that should work. Alright, time to structure all this into the required markdown format. </think>