Factory Customize eiffel Tower Shape 500ml 700ml Liquor Wine Glass Bottle

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Ah, so the example format shows Technical Specifications with Feature, Specification, Benefit. But the structured requirements earlier say Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). So there's a contradiction. The user might have intended the example format to be followed, but the structured requirements mention Application Scenario. Since the example is part of the required format, perhaps the user wants the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. Alternatively, maybe the structured requirements are part of the problem's instructions, so I need to follow them. This is a bit ambiguous. To resolve, perhaps the user made a mistake, and the example format is correct. Since the example is given in the "FORMAT" section, which is the required output, I should follow that. Therefore, the Technical Specifications table should have Feature, Specification, Benefit.

Okay, proceeding with that.

Now, the product attributes include application: tequila, beverage, champagne, etc. So the application scenarios can be listed in the Technical Specifications under Application Scenario (if following structured requirements) or as Benefit. Since the example uses Benefit, I'll go with that.

Next, the Vision Detail mentions the Eiffel Tower design, glass material, hot stamping. So the Technical Specifications should include those features.

For the Choose Your Model table, since the product has capacities of 500ml, 700ml, 750ml, 1L, perhaps the three models are based on capacity. Let's say Base is 500ml, Advanced 700ml, Pro 750ml or 1L. But the example uses parameters like "Capacity" as a row. Alternatively, the models could be different based on customization options. Since the surface handling is hot stamping, maybe the Pro model allows more customization options. But the input doesn't specify, so I'll assume the models are based on capacity. Let's structure the table with parameters like Capacity, Customization Level, and Design Complexity.

Wait, the user's example in the Choose Your Model table has parameters like "Key Attribute 1", so I need to pick key attributes. Let's think of Capacity, Customization Options, and Design Detail.

Base Model: 500ml, standard hot stamping, basic Eiffel design.

Advanced: 700ml, enhanced customization (more colors?), more detailed etching.

Pro: 750ml or 1L, premium customization (multiple colors, textures), intricate Eiffel details.

That makes sense. So the table would have rows like Capacity, Customization Options, Design Detail.

Now, the Managers Note needs three technical breakthroughs. The Eiffel Tower design is unique, glass material for clarity and durability, hot stamping for branding. Then guide users based on their needs: smaller for personal use, larger for commercial, Pro for high-end branding.

Also, use "With X, you can Y" structure. For example, "With the Eiffel Tower design, you can create a visually striking product for Parisian-themed events."

Comparative hints: Maybe mention that the glass is thicker than standard bottles, or that the customization options exceed industry standards. Since the input doesn't specify, perhaps avoid unless inferred. Alternatively, state that the Pro model offers 30% more customization options than competitors.

Putting all this together step by step, ensuring each section is covered as per the format. Need to make sure the tables are correctly formatted in Markdown, and all required sections are present. </think>