Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, in the structured requirements, the user first says the Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. So there's inconsistency here. The user might have intended the Technical Specifications table to follow the example format with Benefit, but the initial instruction says Application Scenario. Since the example format is more specific, perhaps the user expects the Technical Specifications table to have Feature, Specification, Benefit, and the Technical Parameters Table (maybe a different table?) with Application Scenario. But this is confusing. Alternatively, maybe the user made a mistake and the Technical Specifications should have the three columns as per the example. To resolve this, perhaps proceed with the example format's columns (Feature, Specification, Benefit) for the Technical Specifications section, and the Application Scenario might be part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph.

Alternatively, perhaps the Technical Parameters Table is the same as the Technical Specifications table. Maybe the user intended that the Technical Specifications table should have the columns as per the structured requirements. Let me check the exact wording again.

Original instruction says:

"Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the Technical Parameters Table must have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format provided later, the Technical Specifications section is a table with Feature, Specification, Benefit. So there's a conflict. The user might have intended the Technical Parameters Table to be the Technical Specifications section with those three columns. Therefore, I should follow the structured requirements first, making the Technical Specifications table have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. However, the example format shows Benefit. This is conflicting. Since the user provided an example format, perhaps they expect the Technical Specifications table to follow that example, with Benefit. Maybe the structured requirements mention Technical Parameters Table, but in the example, it's called Technical Specifications. Perhaps the user made a terminology mix-up. To resolve, I'll follow the example format's columns (Feature, Specification, Benefit), since that's the explicit example given, and the structured requirements might have a typo. Alternatively, maybe the Application Scenario is part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph. The Scenario Solution Paragraph example says something like "Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because..." which is an application scenario. So perhaps the Technical Parameters Table's Application Scenario column is to list the scenarios where each feature is applicable.

Alternatively, perhaps the user wants the Technical Specifications table to have three columns as per the structured requirements. Let me proceed with that. Let me try to structure the Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.

For example:

Feature | Specification | Application Scenario Material | Clear glass conical flask | Laboratory storage and mixing of chemical solutions Grade | Industrial/Cosmetic Grade | Hair care products, cosmetic formulations Odor | Chemical | Used in environments where chemical odor is acceptable Shelf Life | 12 months | Requires regular stock turnover Packing | 25kg | Suitable for bulk purchasing

But the product is Triolein, so the material here would be the chemical's material, but Triolein is a liquid. The flask's material is glass, but the product itself is the Triolein. So maybe the features should be about the Triolein's properties. The product attributes include application (hair care, cosmetic raw materials), grade (industrial/cosmetic), odor (chemical), packing (25kg), shelf life (12 months), storage (dry place).

So the Technical Parameters Table would list these as features with their specs and application scenarios.

For example:

Feature | Specification | Application Scenario Grade | Industrial/Cosmetic Grade | Industrial manufacturing or high-end cosmetic formulations Odor | Chemical | Used in processes where chemical odor is standard Shelf Life | 12 months | Requires regular inventory management to ensure freshness Packing | 25kg drums | Bulk purchasing for large-scale production Storage | Dry place | Prevents moisture-induced degradation

That makes sense. Then the Scenario Solution Paragraph would elaborate on how these features apply in specific scenarios, like using cosmetic grade for skincare products.

The Customization Guide would mention that grades can be adjusted, packing sizes might be customizable, etc.

The Choose Your Model table needs three versions. Since the product has two grades (industrial and cosmetic), perhaps the third could be a premium version. Let's define the three models as Industrial Grade, Cosmetic Grade, and Premium Cosmetic Grade. The parameters could be Purity, Stability, and Certification Level.

Parameter | Base Model (Industrial) | Advanced (Cosmetic) | Pro (Premium) Purity | 98% | 99% | 99.5% Stability | 6 months | 12 months | 24 months Certification | Industrial Standard | Cosmetic Grade | ISO 22716 Certified Odor Control | Standard | Reduced | Odorless

But the product's shelf life is 12 months, so maybe stability is different. Alternatively, use other parameters like viscosity, compatibility, or application-specific features.

Managers Note's first paragraph should highlight three breakthroughs. For example, high purity ensures consistent formulation, extended shelf life reduces waste, and odor control for sensitive applications. The second paragraph guides selection: Industrial for cost-effective needs, Cosmetic for standard products, Pro for high-end requiring premium standards.

Now, putting it all into the markdown structure with the required sections and ensuring the "With X, you can Y" structure where possible. Also, include comparative hints if applicable, like "30% longer shelf life than competitors".

Let me draft each section step by step. </think>