Factory Direct Stackable End Side Table With Vertical Storage for Bedroom

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, so the Technical Specifications table in the format has Feature, Specification, Benefit. But the structured requirements mention Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. There's a conflict here. The user might have conflicting instructions. Let me check again.

Looking at the user's instruction:

"Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given)

Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

But in the format example, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. So perhaps the user wants the Technical Specifications table to have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario instead of Benefit? Or maybe they are separate tables? Wait, perhaps the Technical Parameters Table is the one with Application Scenario, and the Technical Specifications is another. Wait, the user might have a mix-up here. Since the user's example format shows Technical Specifications with Benefit, but the structured requirements mention Technical Parameters Table with Application Scenario. To resolve this, perhaps the user wants the Technical Specifications table to include Application Scenario instead of Benefit. Alternatively, maybe the Technical Parameters Table is a different table. Since the user's example format includes Technical Specifications with Benefit, but the structured requirements mention another table. Hmm, perhaps I should follow the format example given, which uses Benefit. But the user's instruction says Technical Parameters Table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. Maybe the user wants two tables? The Technical Specifications as per the example, and the Technical Parameters Table as per the structured requirements. But the user's format example includes only the Technical Specifications table. This is a bit confusing. To avoid errors, perhaps I should follow the format example provided by the user, which uses Feature, Specification, Benefit. Since the user's example shows that, and the instructions might have conflicting info. Alternatively, perhaps the Technical Parameters Table is part of the Technical Specifications. Maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications to have those three columns. Let me proceed with the example's format, as that's the final format they want.

Moving on. The Technical Specifications table needs to list features, their specifications, and the benefit. Let's list the features from the product attributes and image details.

Features:

• Material: Solid wood with rustic finish and metal legs. So the material feature is solid wood and metal. Specification: Solid wood frame with metal legs. Benefit: Durable and combines rustic charm with modern touch.

• Stackable Design: The title mentions stackable. So Feature: Stackable Design. Specification: Stackable for space-saving storage. Benefit: Easy storage and transport.

• Vertical Storage: The title says "With Vertical Storage". The image mentions open shelves. So Feature: Vertical Storage. Specification: Open shelves on sides. Benefit: Additional storage space for books, decor, etc.

• Extendable: Product attributes say "extendable". Maybe the table can be extended in size? Or the shelves can be adjusted? The image mentions a rectangular top with overhang. Perhaps the overhang allows for some extension? Alternatively, maybe the shelves can be extended. Since it's unclear, I'll assume the extendable feature refers to adjustable shelves. So Feature: Adjustable Shelves. Specification: Adjustable shelves for customizable storage. Benefit: Customizable storage space.

• Minimalist Design: The image describes a contemporary, minimalist design. Feature: Minimalist Design. Specification: Clean lines and simple structure. Benefit: Complements various interior styles.

Wait, but the user's input product attributes don't mention design aspects, but the image does. Since the vision detail should be included, I should incorporate those. So the features should include both product attributes and vision details.

Now, compiling the Technical Specifications table:

Wait, but "extendable" is in the product attributes. Maybe "Adjustable Shelves" is better. Also, the title mentions "vertical storage", so maybe the shelves are vertical. Alternatively, the vertical storage is the shelves themselves. The benefit of vertical storage is efficient use of space.

Next, the Customization Guide. The user wants a customization hint like "Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs". The image mentions customization through rustic finish and metal legs. Also, the open shelves allow for easy access. So maybe the customization hint is about adjusting the shelves or material finishes. For example: "Adjustable shelf heights to meet specific storage needs or customization of wood/metal finishes to match room decor."

Scenario Solution Paragraph: Example given is about fabric thickness for shirts. Here, the scenario would be using the table in a bedroom or living room. Example: "The vertical storage shelves are ideal for displaying decorative items in a living room or books in a bedroom, maximizing space efficiency while maintaining a minimalist aesthetic."

Next, the Choose Your Model table. The user wants three versions compared against benchmarks. Since the product is a side table, the models might be Basic, Advanced, Pro. The parameters could be things like load capacity, material quality, number of shelves, stackability, etc. The user's example uses parameters like chemical resistance, so for furniture, maybe durability, storage capacity, design flexibility.

Assuming the three models are Base, Advanced, Pro:

Parameters could be:

• Load Capacity
• Number of Shelves
• Material Quality (e.g., solid wood vs. MDF)
• Stackability
• Adjustable Shelves

For example:

But need to align with the product attributes. The product attributes mention "extendable" which might relate to adjustable shelves. The Pro model could have more adjustable features.

Managers Note needs two paragraphs: first explaining three technical breakthroughs using features, and second guiding users to choose based on applicable crowd.

Technical breakthroughs could be:

1. Stackable design with solid wood – allows space-saving storage without compromising durability.
2. Adjustable shelves – customizable storage solutions.
3. Combination of rustic wood and metal – modern and rustic aesthetic.

Guidance: Base model for basic needs, Advanced for more storage and adjustability, Pro for heavy use and customizable needs.

Also, use "With X, you can Y" structure. For example, "With the stackable design, you can easily store multiple tables when not in use."

Comparative hints: "20% lighter than traditional wooden tables" if applicable, but since material is solid wood, maybe "30% stronger than MDF alternatives".

Putting it all together now. </think>