Factory Price Automatic Donut Fryer Machine Donut Maker Donut Machine

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Ah, so in the structured requirements, the user first mentions the Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format provided later, the Technical Specifications table uses Feature, Specification, Benefit. There's a contradiction here.

Looking at the user's instruction again, perhaps the Technical Parameters Table (with Application Scenario) is separate from the Technical Specifications table in the example. Wait, the user's instruction says:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

So the user first wants a Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But in the example format provided later, the Technical Specifications section has Feature, Specification, Benefit. The user might have intended that the Technical Specifications table in the example is the same as the Technical Parameters Table mentioned earlier. Perhaps the columns were mislabeled. Alternatively, maybe the user wants two tables, but given the example format, I should follow the example's structure. Since the example shows the Technical Specifications with Benefit, I'll proceed with that, assuming that the user might have made a mistake in the initial instruction. Alternatively, maybe Application Scenario is part of the Benefit column. To avoid confusion, I'll follow the example's format for the Technical Specifications table, using Feature, Specification, Benefit.

Proceeding with that, the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit.

Now, the Scenario Solution Paragraph is a separate section, perhaps under Get Inspiration? The example's Get Inspiration is a short intro, but the Scenario Solution is a paragraph explaining application scenarios. Maybe the Scenario Solution is part of the Get Inspiration section. Alternatively, it's a separate section. The user's instruction says "Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...)" so that should be a paragraph explaining how the product's features suit certain scenarios. Perhaps that's part of the Technical Specifications section or a separate paragraph. Given the example format, maybe it's part of the Get Inspiration section.

Alternatively, the user might have intended the Scenario Solution as a separate section. But since the example format doesn't mention it, perhaps it's integrated into the Technical Specifications' Benefit column. Hmm, tricky. To be safe, I'll include the Scenario Solution as a paragraph under the Technical Specifications section or in the Get Inspiration part.

Wait, the user's example format shows:

Technical Specifications

Customization Guide

(customization hints) ...

Get Inspiration

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

So the Scenario Solution might be part of the Get Inspiration. The example given for Scenario Solution is like "Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...", which is an application scenario. So perhaps the Get Inspiration section should include such examples.

Putting it all together:

Product Details: A brief intro about the machine.

Technical Specifications table with Feature, Specification, Benefit.

Customization Guide: Suggest adjustable parameters like temperature, timer, capacity.

Get Inspiration: A paragraph highlighting scenarios like bakeries, cafes, using the machine's features to produce donuts efficiently.

Choose Your Model table comparing the three models.

Managers Note: Two paragraphs, one on breakthroughs (stainless steel, adjustable temp, mini design), and selection guide based on user needs.

Now, let's start drafting each section.

Product Details: Start with the title and category. The title is "Factory Price Automatic Donut Fryer Machine Donut Maker Donut Machine". The category is Snack Machines. The product attributes include making donuts, stainless steel material, voltage 220V, mini and donut fryer type, and raw materials like wheat flour.

So the opening could be something like:

"Introducing the Factory Price Automatic Donut Fryer Machine, a high-efficiency commercial solution for producing fresh, delicious donuts. Designed with durable stainless steel construction and compact mini design, this machine ensures hygiene and space-saving operation. Ideal for bakeries, cafes, and food processors, it simplifies the donut-making process from dough preparation to frying, all while maintaining consistent quality."

Technical Specifications table:

Wait, the product attributes mention "machinery function:make donuts" so that's a feature. "raw material:wheat,wheat flour,water,milk" so that's a feature. "type:mini,donut fryer" so type is mini and donut fryer. Voltage is 220V.

Customization Guide: "Adjustable frying temperature and timer settings to meet specific recipe requirements. Customizable capacity options available for varying production needs."

Get Inspiration: "Ideal for commercial bakeries and cafes, this automatic donut fryer ensures consistent, high-quality donut production. With its stainless steel build and mini footprint, it's perfect for spaces where efficiency and hygiene are priorities. Whether crafting classic glazed donuts or innovative flavored varieties, this machine adapts to your menu demands."

Choose Your Model table:

The parameters need to be key attributes. Let's choose Production Capacity, Frying Speed, Automation Level, and Temperature Control Range.

Wait, the user's example uses baseline values and then +15%, +30%. So for Production Capacity, Base is 50, Advanced is +15% (57.5 rounded to 58), Pro +30% (65). Frying Speed could be "Standard" vs "20% faster than traditional models" but need to align with the structure. Alternatively, use the same format. Maybe "Frying Speed" as a parameter with Base: 10 mins per batch, Advanced: 8.5 (15% faster), Pro: 7 (30% faster). But the user's example shows baseline value and then increments. Let me adjust:

But need to ensure the parameters are clear. Alternatively, use the user's example's structure where the first row has a baseline value and the others have percentages. Maybe:

Hmm, but the user's example shows "Baseline Value" in the first column, then the others have [+15%], etc. So for the first row, the Base Model has the baseline value, and the others show the improvement over that. So for Production Capacity, Base is 50, Advanced is +15% (so 57.5), Pro +30% (65). So the table would be:

Alternatively, using the user's example's exact structure, perhaps the first row's Base has a value, and the others have percentages. Let me pick key attributes like capacity, speed, automation, and temperature control.

Managers Note:

First paragraph: three technical breakthroughs. Let's pick:

1. Stainless Steel Construction: Ensures durability and hygiene, critical for food safety.

2. Adjustable Temperature Control: Allows precise frying to achieve perfect texture and reduce waste.

3. Mini Design: Space-saving for small kitchens while maintaining output.

Second paragraph: Guide selection. Base for small cafes needing basic functionality, Advanced for medium bakeries requiring speed and semi-automation, Pro for high-volume with full automation and precision.

Putting it all together in the required format. </think>