Factory Price Custom Gold Edged Tarot Cards Printing Tarot Decks With Booklet

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, the user's structured requirements mention a Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, but in the format example, they have a Technical Specifications table with Feature, Specification, Benefit. So there's a conflict here. The user might have intended that the Technical Specifications table in the format should follow the structured requirements. Alternatively, maybe the user made an error. Since the user's instruction says to follow the structured requirements first, perhaps the Technical Parameters Table should have the three columns as specified, but the example format shows a different one.

Alternatively, perhaps the user wants two tables: the Technical Parameters Table as per the structured requirements (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario), and then the Technical Specifications as per the example (Feature, Specification, Benefit). But that would be redundant. Alternatively, maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications section to be the Technical Parameters Table.

This is a bit confusing. To resolve, I'll follow the user's explicit instruction in the structured requirements: "Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)". So the Technical Specifications section in the format should be that table. But in the example, they have Benefit as the third column. Hmm. Alternatively, perhaps the user made a mistake in the example. Since the user's instruction is clear in the structured requirements, I'll proceed with the columns they specified.

Therefore, the Technical Specifications table should have Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. But the example shows Benefit. To avoid confusion, perhaps the user intended the Technical Specifications to be the Technical Parameters Table. So I'll structure it as per the user's instruction.

Alternatively, maybe the user wants both. But given the example format, perhaps the Technical Specifications is the table with Benefit. Let me check the example again. The user's example format shows:

Technical Specifications

So perhaps the user wants the Technical Specifications to have Benefit instead of Application Scenario. But in the structured requirements, they mentioned Application Scenario. Maybe there's a mix-up here. Since the user's example format is more specific, perhaps I should follow that.

Wait, the user's instruction says:

"Please convert the following information into a table and descriptive text:

Vision Detail -> Corresponding parameters(Material / size / ...) Product Attributes -> Technical specifications( certification standard / ...) Structured Requirements:

Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario) Customization Hint (Adjustable XX parameters to meet XX special needs) Scenario Solution Paragraph (Example: Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because...) (Act as a technical writer. Refer to the product cluster classification table given) Create a Choose Your Model table comparing our three versions against industry benchmarks, using this structure: ..."

Then in the format, they have a Technical Specifications table with Benefit.

This is conflicting. To resolve, perhaps the user intended the Technical Parameters Table to be the one in the structured requirements (Feature, Specification, Application Scenario), and the Technical Specifications in the format is another table. But that's not clear. Alternatively, maybe the user made a mistake and the Technical Specifications in the format should have the Application Scenario column.

Given that the user provided an example format, I'll prioritize that. The example shows the Technical Specifications with Benefit, so I'll follow that. The structured requirements might have been a mistake.

Alternatively, perhaps the user wants both tables. But since the example format includes Technical Specifications, I'll proceed with that.

So, moving forward, the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit.

Now, for the Technical Specifications:

• Feature: Material, Specification: High-quality paper, Benefit: Durable and long-lasting
• Surface Finishing: Gold edge, Benefit: Enhances luxury appeal
• Type: Tarot (normal), Benefit: Compatible with standard tarot practices
• Application: Gifts, Benefit: Ideal for gift-giving occasions

Wait, but the user's product attributes mention application as gifts, so that's an application scenario. But the Technical Specifications table's third column is Benefit. So maybe Application Scenario is part of the Scenario Solution Paragraph instead.

The Scenario Solution Paragraph should be like "Medium thickness fabric is suitable for making summer shirts because..." So perhaps the application scenarios are covered there.

Alright, proceeding with the Technical Specifications as per the example's columns.

Next, the Customization Guide: The product attributes say the deck is not customizable, but the deck as a whole may allow personalization through booklet content or stickers. So the customization hint could be suggesting that while the cards aren't customizable, the booklet can be personalized.

The Get Inspiration section should highlight the vibrant design and creative aspects, maybe mentioning the Queen of Wands imagery to inspire creativity and inner strength.

For the Choose Your Model table, the parameters could be Edge Finish Quality, Artwork Detail, Booklet Content.

Base Model: Standard gold edges, basic artwork, standard booklet.

Advanced: Enhanced gold edges, detailed artwork, expanded booklet.

Pro: Premium gold edges, high-detail artwork, in-depth booklet.

Comparing to industry benchmarks, maybe traditional decks have no gold edges or basic booklets.

Managers Note: Breakthroughs could be the gold edge durability, vibrant printing technology, and comprehensive booklet.

Version selection: Base for budget-conscious buyers, Advanced for collectors, Pro for professionals needing detailed insights.

Now, structuring all this into markdown as per the example format.

I need to ensure that all sections are included and formatted correctly. Let me draft each part step by step. </think>