Supplier's note
...
Ah, so the user's structured requirements mention the Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario, but in the example format, the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. There's a conflict here. Since the user's format example is more specific, perhaps they want the table as per the example (Feature, Specification, Benefit) even though the structured requirements mention Application Scenario. Alternatively, maybe the user made a mistake. To resolve this, I'll follow the example's format because the final output must match the given format. The example's Technical Specifications table has three columns: Feature, Specification, Benefit. So I'll use that structure instead of the Application Scenario. The user might have intended that. Let me proceed with that.
Now, for the Technical Specifications table:
Features from product attributes and vision details:
- Material: Plastic (from Product Attributes: material:plastic)
- Battery Capacity: 10000mAh (though the attributes mention 20000mah as well, but maybe the main product is 10000mAh as per title)
- Charging Speed: Fast charging with QC3.0 (from attributes: charging speed:fast, feature:fast chargers, qc3.0)
- Output Interfaces: Type-C, USB, Micro USB (output interface:type-c,usb,micro usb)
- Output Power: 10W (output power:10w)
- Design: Round, compact, sleek (from vision details)
- Digital Display: Battery level (vision details)
- Portability: Mini, portable (product attributes: application:portable,mini)
So the table would have rows for each of these features, with their specifications and benefits.
Next, Customization Guide: The user wants adjustable parameters. The product has different capacities (10000mAh, 20000mAh), so maybe the customization hint is that the capacity can be adjusted based on user needs. Also, the cables are integrated but maybe the types can be adjusted? The attributes mention multiple interfaces, so perhaps the customization is selecting capacity and interface types. The hint could be: "Adjustable battery capacity options (10000mAh to 20000mAh) to meet varying power needs. Customizable interface configurations for device compatibility."
Get Inspiration: Highlight the unique aspects. The circular design, integrated cables, digital display, portability, fast charging.
Choose Your Model table: Need three models. The product attributes mention 10000mAh and 20000mAh. Maybe Base is 10000mAh, Advanced 15000mAh, Pro 20000mAh. Parameters could include capacity, charging speed, output power, interfaces, weight, etc. The example uses +15% and +30%, so for capacity, Base is 10k, Advanced 11.5k (but since actual is 20k, maybe better to use actual numbers). Alternatively, maybe the parameters are:
- Capacity: 10000mAh (Base), 15000mAh (Advanced), 20000mAh (Pro)
- Charging Speed: QC3.0 (Base), QC4.0 (Advanced), QC4.0+ (Pro)
- Output Power: 10W (Base), 18W (Advanced), 24W (Pro)
- Interfaces: All three (Base), same (maybe add more?), but the product has all three already. Maybe the Pro has more ports? Not sure. Alternatively, the Pro might have higher output per port.
Managers Note: First paragraph on technical breakthroughs. The three could be:
- Circular design for portability and style
- QC3.0 fast charging
- Integrated cables for convenience
Second paragraph guiding selection: Base for basic needs, Advanced for faster charging and moderate use, Pro for high capacity and power users.
Need to ensure all sentences use "With X, you can Y" structure where possible. For example, "With the QC3.0 fast charging technology, you can..." Also include comparative hints like "20% faster than traditional models" if applicable. The product attributes mention "fast charging", so maybe compare to non-QC models.
Now, putting it all together in markdown as per the format.
</think>