Supplier's note
...
But the user's instruction says the Technical Parameters Table should have Application Scenario instead of Benefit. This is conflicting. Since the example format is given, maybe the user expects the Technical Specifications table to have Benefit, and the structured requirements are additional. Alternatively, perhaps the user made a mistake and the Technical Specifications table should have the three columns from the structured requirements.
Given the confusion, perhaps I should follow the example's structure but incorporate the user's structured requirements where possible. For instance, in the Technical Specifications table, include Application Scenario as the third column instead of Benefit.
Alternatively, since the example's Technical Specifications table includes Benefit, maybe the user wants that. To resolve this, I'll proceed with the example's structure but ensure that the content aligns with the vision details and product attributes.
Let me proceed with the example's structure, but adjust the columns as per the user's instructions. Wait, the user's instruction says "Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario)" but the example's Technical Specifications table has Benefit. Since the user provided both, perhaps they want two tables? But the example doesn't show that.
Alternatively, maybe the user intended the Technical Specifications table to have the three columns from the structured requirements. Let me proceed with that.
Final approach:
- Product Details: Brief intro based on vision and attributes.
- Technical Specifications table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario.
- Customization Guide with hints.
- Get Inspiration paragraph.
- Choose Your Model table.
- Managers Note with two paragraphs as specified.
Now, writing each section with the data collected earlier.
</think>