Supplier's note
...
Ah, here the Technical Specifications table has Feature, Specification, Benefit. But the structured requirements earlier mention Technical Parameters Table with Feature, Specification, Application Scenario. There's a contradiction here. Since the user provided the format with Technical Specifications as Feature, Spec, Benefit, perhaps they want that. The earlier mention of Technical Parameters Table might be an error. Alternatively, maybe the user wants two tables, but given the format example, I should follow the format's structure.
Alternatively, perhaps the Technical Parameters Table is the same as the Technical Specifications in the format. Maybe the user made a mistake in the structured requirements. To resolve this, I'll proceed with the format's Technical Specifications table as per the example, since the user provided that as the required format.
Therefore, the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit. The Application Scenario might be part of the Scenario Solution paragraph instead.
Moving on. The product attributes mention application scenarios like festivals, parties, events, New Year. So in the Technical Specifications, under Application Scenario, but since the table uses Benefit, I'll focus on benefits there.
Now, the vision details mention the device has 24 buttons arranged in a grid, but the product title says 36 channels. So the channels are 36, but the buttons are 24. Maybe each button controls multiple channels? Or perhaps the 24 buttons are part of the interface, but the system supports 36 channels. Need to clarify. The title says 36 channels, so that's the key spec.
The material is plastic, so the casing is plastic. The vision details mention a foam-lined protective case, which is part of the design. So the material is plastic with a protective case.
The remote control has a display screen, which is part of the features. The voltage display is a specification. The 12V DC input is a power spec.
Now, the Technical Specifications table:
Feature: Remote Control Channels → 36 programmable channels → Benefit: Enables synchronized control of complex firework displays.
Feature: Material → Durable plastic casing with foam-lined protective case → Benefit: Shock-resistant and portable for outdoor use.
Feature: Voltage Monitoring → Digital voltage display → Benefit: Real-time monitoring ensures optimal power delivery to fireworks.
Feature: Wireless Communication → Built-in antenna → Benefit: Reliable remote operation up to 500 meters.
Feature: Power Input → 12V DC → Benefit: Compatible with standard power sources for easy setup.
Application Scenario for each? Maybe not, since the table uses Benefit. The Scenario Solution paragraph can mention that the voltage monitoring is suitable for outdoor events where power fluctuations are common.
Customization Guide: Adjustable parameters like firing sequence timing, channel assignments, voltage thresholds. For example, users can adjust timing intervals between fireworks or set voltage thresholds for safety.
Get Inspiration: Highlight the system's ability to handle large-scale events with precise control, ensuring safety and synchronization.
Choose Your Model table:
Parameters could be Channel Capacity, Wireless Range, Customization Level, and maybe Safety Features.
Base Model: 36 channels, 500m range, basic customization.
Advanced: 40 channels, 750m (+50%), advanced customization.
Pro: 48 channels, 1000m (+100%), full customization.
Comparing to industry benchmarks, perhaps the base is standard, advanced is +15% range over industry average, pro +30%.
Managers Note: Technical breakthroughs could be the 36+ channels, extended range, and voltage monitoring. Then guide users: for small events, base; medium, advanced; large, pro. Mention Pro's 1000m range allows control over large venues, and voltage monitoring prevents malfunctions.
Need to use "With X, you can Y" structure. For example, "With 36 programmable channels, you can synchronize complex firework displays with precision."
Also include comparative hints like "30% longer range than industry standards" if applicable.
Now, putting it all together in markdown as per the format.
</think>