Flexible Coupling with O Ring and Flat Gasket Ductile GGG50 Repair PVC PE Pipe Swivel Gibault Joint

Technical specifications

Customization guide

(customization hints) ...

Get inspired

(a short introduction to inspire customers)

Choose your model

Supplier's note

...

Wait, the user's format example shows Technical Specifications with Feature, Specification, Benefit. But in the structured requirements, they said Technical Parameters Table (Columns: Feature, Specification, Application Scenario). So there's a discrepancy here. The user might have made a mistake, but since the format example uses Benefit, I should follow the format example's structure. Because the user provided the format with Benefit, so I'll go with that.

So, the Technical Specifications table will have Feature, Specification, Benefit.

Now, moving on. The product attributes include certification:CE, so that's a feature with CE certification as the spec, and the benefit is compliance with EU standards.

Material: PE, PVC, Iron, UPVC. Wait, the product is a ductile iron (GGG50) coupling, but the material also includes PE and PVC? Wait, the product is a coupling for PVC and PE pipes, so the coupling itself is made of ductile iron (GGG50), but the compatible materials are PE and PVC. Maybe the material feature should be the coupling's material (ductile iron) and the compatible materials (PE/PVC/UPVC). Need to clarify.

The product attributes list material:pe,pvc,iron,upvc. So perhaps the coupling can be made with different materials? Or maybe the materials it connects are PE/PVC/UPVC. Since the title mentions "Repair PVC PE Pipe", the coupling is for these pipes, so the material of the coupling is iron (ductile iron), but compatible with PE/PVC.

Hmm, perhaps the material feature is the coupling's material (ductile iron GGG50), and the compatible materials are PE/PVC/UPVC. So in the table, under Feature: Material, Specification: Ductile Iron (GGG50), Benefit: High strength and corrosion resistance. Then another row for Compatible Materials: PE/PVC/UPVC, Benefit: Versatile for various pipe types.

Pressure: PN16. That's a pressure rating, so Feature: Pressure Rating, Spec: PN16 (1.6 MPa), Benefit: Suitable for high-pressure applications.

Connection type: welding, weld. So Feature: Connection Type, Spec: Welding, Benefit: Secure and permanent connection.

Shape: round, equal. So Feature: Shape, Spec: Round, Equal Bore, Benefit: Seamless flow and minimal pressure loss.

Technics: casting. Feature: Manufacturing Process, Spec: Precision Casting, Benefit: Consistent quality and structural integrity.

Certification: CE. Feature: Certification, Spec: CE Certified, Benefit: Compliance with EU safety standards.

Okay, that covers all attributes.

Next, the Customization Guide. The user's input mentions "Customization: These flanges can be customized to fit specific pipe diameters and lengths." So the hint should be "Adjustable bore sizes and lengths to accommodate varying pipe diameters and repair needs."

Scenario Solution Paragraph: "Medium thickness fabric..." example. For flanges, maybe: "The round equal bore design ensures smooth fluid flow, making it ideal for high-pressure plumbing systems where efficiency is critical."

Wait, the example was for fabric, but here it's flanges. So adjust accordingly. The scenario solution should explain how a feature suits a scenario. Like: "The ductile iron material combined with PN16 pressure rating makes this coupling suitable for industrial water supply systems requiring both strength and corrosion resistance."

Now the Choose Your Model table. The user's example has three models: Base, Advanced, Pro. The parameters need to compare against industry benchmarks. Let's think of key attributes like Material Grade, Pressure Rating, Sealing System, maybe Bolt Count, or Chemical Resistance.

Assuming the Base Model uses standard ductile iron (GGG40), Advanced uses GGG50, Pro uses GGG60. Pressure: Base PN10, Advanced PN16, Pro PN25. Sealing: Base O-ring, Advanced O-ring + gasket, Pro triple-seal system.

Comparing against industry benchmarks: if industry standard is PN10, then Advanced is +50% over base, Pro is +150%? Or maybe the base is PN16, and advanced is higher? Need to check the product attributes. The product's pressure is PN16, so maybe the Base is PN16, Advanced PN20, Pro PN25? Or perhaps the base is lower. Alternatively, the base model might have a lower grade material.

Alternatively, the parameters could be Material Grade, Sealing Efficiency, Pressure Capacity. Let's structure it as:

But the product's given pressure is PN16, so maybe the Advanced is PN16, Pro is higher. The Base could be PN10 as a baseline.

In the Managers Note, the first paragraph should highlight three breakthroughs. For example, the GGG50 material, PN16 pressure, and triple seal system.

Second paragraph guides selection: For residential use, Base is enough. Industrial needs Pro for higher pressure and chemical resistance.

Also, use "With X, you can Y" structure. Like "With the GGG50 ductile iron material, you can ensure durability in harsh industrial environments."

Comparative hints: "20% higher pressure capacity than industry standards."

Putting it all together now. Need to ensure all parts are covered and formatted correctly in markdown. </think>